Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542044556 Timestamp) Women personalize everything. Men generalize everything. It’s like talking to two different species….

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542066101 Timestamp) My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic pool from the masculine/k-selected/pack/eugenic pool. We are wealthy enough to afford the production of preferred but DIFFERENT commons, and if the dysgenic herd wants to produce their preferred commons and the eugenic pack wants to produce their preferred commons the only thing preventing both achieving their goals is the current monopoly commons. The solution is to separate (secede) and devolve normative regulation and commons production to the groups and let them speciate. The question MIGHT be race, but it’s not. It’s genetic strategy. The dysgenic and the eugenic. I’m perfectly happy if you folks want to construct india and brazil as long as those of us who want otherwise continue the western tradition of eugenic social order and continuous production of prosperity.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542066101 Timestamp) My argument is always the same. Separate the feminine/r-selected/herd/dysgenic pool from the masculine/k-selected/pack/eugenic pool. We are wealthy enough to afford the production of preferred but DIFFERENT commons, and if the dysgenic herd wants to produce their preferred commons and the eugenic pack wants to produce their preferred commons the only thing preventing both achieving their goals is the current monopoly commons. The solution is to separate (secede) and devolve normative regulation and commons production to the groups and let them speciate. The question MIGHT be race, but it’s not. It’s genetic strategy. The dysgenic and the eugenic. I’m perfectly happy if you folks want to construct india and brazil as long as those of us who want otherwise continue the western tradition of eugenic social order and continuous production of prosperity.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542053782 Timestamp) THE ECONOMICS OF GENDER —“the Hermetic principle. Gender exists within everything. Male, female, hard, soft, light, dark. The similarities between his comparisons are characteristics of gender.”–Bradley Morgan Um.. how would you state that scientifically: I can, in that the computational efficiency (calculation of successful specialization) of genders (two of them) defeated all other permutations and the additional calculative variation of additional genders seems to NOT provide enough additional value to compete with two genders. There is an argument that male and female cognitive structures in humans produce a spectrum from extremes of either end to a balance, and that this allows us to calculate the exploitation of a wider variety of opportunities than rigid specialization would. This is possibly the optimum method of evolutionary progress because we do not require the cost of a third or more gender, but we can still produce adaptive responses and express them anywhere between the extremes.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542055561 Timestamp) THE COMING CIVIL WAR WILL NOT BE OVER RACE It is, and will be war over SPECIATION. Whether we will regress into the equalitarian herd, or evolve into hierarchical packs. We are wealthy enough to speciate. Each side wants to produce commons that suit its method of speciation: herd(r), or pack(k). Since this question is not possible to resolve by compromise, our only choice is separation. This means that some significant portion of the ingroup will exit. And this is politically, economically, strategically, and evolutionarily desirable. Unfortunately the herd always fears the pack, and will resist it.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542053782 Timestamp) THE ECONOMICS OF GENDER —“the Hermetic principle. Gender exists within everything. Male, female, hard, soft, light, dark. The similarities between his comparisons are characteristics of gender.”–Bradley Morgan Um.. how would you state that scientifically: I can, in that the computational efficiency (calculation of successful specialization) of genders (two of them) defeated all other permutations and the additional calculative variation of additional genders seems to NOT provide enough additional value to compete with two genders. There is an argument that male and female cognitive structures in humans produce a spectrum from extremes of either end to a balance, and that this allows us to calculate the exploitation of a wider variety of opportunities than rigid specialization would. This is possibly the optimum method of evolutionary progress because we do not require the cost of a third or more gender, but we can still produce adaptive responses and express them anywhere between the extremes.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542211728 Timestamp) (Going to be interesting to watch how white women respond now that the left has targeted white women as they have targeted white men. Traitors always pay double. )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542211728 Timestamp) (Going to be interesting to watch how white women respond now that the left has targeted white women as they have targeted white men. Traitors always pay double. )

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542306429 Timestamp) THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH (important sequence of arguments) There are reasons why so many people in the postwar, postmodern, feminist, and underclass movements are rigid deniers of our indifference from breeding of any other domesticated animals, and the similar differences in trait expression. We know those reasons. The fact that people believe the ‘nurture’ fallacy correlates with all other similar social cognitive biases and related fallacies, because people actively select for these falsehoods because their genes encourage and force them to. Even if confronted with the overwhelming evidence that the pseudosciences of Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et all, they will admit the science but deny its application in order to defend their genetic drives. We can easily measure these differences in brain structure with female biased brains favoring this “herd-prey illusion” and male brains favoring the purely empirical “pack-hunter” bias. Evolution gave us those genetic biases for obvious reasons given the distribution of reproductive responsibilities. Genese do not exist in isolation, no, however: (a) modification of genetic disposition is endocrine and developmental it does not modify the genome (b) In the nature-nurture debate it’s 80% nature, and the rest adaptation to circumstances that FAVOR that nature. (c) Nurture can only HARM but not improve the individual (d) Education only falsifies tests but over time all of us grow into (form to) our genes. (e) The most important decision you can make for your children is who you mate with, since regression to the mean is impossible to avoid without controlled breeding (what europeans did for the past 1300 years until 1960) (f) This is contrary to mother’s instincts (they intuit everything through amplified perception because they must given the fragility of young, and high pre-modern child mortality rates) and contrary to the instincts of feminized males, but it is incontrovertible in the data. This amplified perception begins in puberty, and is the source of the overwhelmingly common female mental illness when women are not supplied with sufficient child rearing responsibilities in order to burden the cognitive-emotional load. (g) These facts are impossible for the pseudoscientists and sophists (created by Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et al) in the marxist, postmodern, feminist movements to accept because it means (correctly) that: i) man was not oppressed but domesticated like every other animal and plant, and that those who are on the left are still incompletely domesticated. ii) classes are natural reflections of necessity given the abilities of the individuals to both process information and suppress animal impulses, the most common of which is gratification-delay, iii) no marxist, postmodern, feminist revolution is possible because the competence structure necessary for the preservation of human standards of living cannot tolerate any other distribution than the Pareto. iv) the optimum possible social order requires continuation of the Truth over Face of western civilization that requires we all understand our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value (our ‘status’) is genetically determined, and that we can only create small homogenous ethnocentric polities that due to kin selection are biased to the highly redistributive. But that you are stuck with your ‘status’ at birth unless you are overwhelmingly lucky to match extreme effort with extreme luck. So no, Plomin tries very hard to mollify the Genetic-Denialist movement but the data is in and incontestable – Genetic determinism is what it is and we are no different from breeds of dogs, and the differences between individuals as well as groups is the same as the difference between breeds of animals, or in the case of great apes, that we are effectively as different a series of species as are bonobos and chimpanzees. This is totally intolerable to the feminine-marxist-postmodernist-feminist dysgenic religion of pseudoscience, sophism, and denialism, invented by boas, marx, freud, adorno, and derrida etc as a counter-revolution against Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, Maxwell, Poincare, and the second, german, scientific revolution. The eugenicists were right and the chinese will get there first and they will win the war – unless we end the pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit of the left cult of equality.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542306429 Timestamp) THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH (important sequence of arguments) There are reasons why so many people in the postwar, postmodern, feminist, and underclass movements are rigid deniers of our indifference from breeding of any other domesticated animals, and the similar differences in trait expression. We know those reasons. The fact that people believe the ‘nurture’ fallacy correlates with all other similar social cognitive biases and related fallacies, because people actively select for these falsehoods because their genes encourage and force them to. Even if confronted with the overwhelming evidence that the pseudosciences of Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et all, they will admit the science but deny its application in order to defend their genetic drives. We can easily measure these differences in brain structure with female biased brains favoring this “herd-prey illusion” and male brains favoring the purely empirical “pack-hunter” bias. Evolution gave us those genetic biases for obvious reasons given the distribution of reproductive responsibilities. Genese do not exist in isolation, no, however: (a) modification of genetic disposition is endocrine and developmental it does not modify the genome (b) In the nature-nurture debate it’s 80% nature, and the rest adaptation to circumstances that FAVOR that nature. (c) Nurture can only HARM but not improve the individual (d) Education only falsifies tests but over time all of us grow into (form to) our genes. (e) The most important decision you can make for your children is who you mate with, since regression to the mean is impossible to avoid without controlled breeding (what europeans did for the past 1300 years until 1960) (f) This is contrary to mother’s instincts (they intuit everything through amplified perception because they must given the fragility of young, and high pre-modern child mortality rates) and contrary to the instincts of feminized males, but it is incontrovertible in the data. This amplified perception begins in puberty, and is the source of the overwhelmingly common female mental illness when women are not supplied with sufficient child rearing responsibilities in order to burden the cognitive-emotional load. (g) These facts are impossible for the pseudoscientists and sophists (created by Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et al) in the marxist, postmodern, feminist movements to accept because it means (correctly) that: i) man was not oppressed but domesticated like every other animal and plant, and that those who are on the left are still incompletely domesticated. ii) classes are natural reflections of necessity given the abilities of the individuals to both process information and suppress animal impulses, the most common of which is gratification-delay, iii) no marxist, postmodern, feminist revolution is possible because the competence structure necessary for the preservation of human standards of living cannot tolerate any other distribution than the Pareto. iv) the optimum possible social order requires continuation of the Truth over Face of western civilization that requires we all understand our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value (our ‘status’) is genetically determined, and that we can only create small homogenous ethnocentric polities that due to kin selection are biased to the highly redistributive. But that you are stuck with your ‘status’ at birth unless you are overwhelmingly lucky to match extreme effort with extreme luck. So no, Plomin tries very hard to mollify the Genetic-Denialist movement but the data is in and incontestable – Genetic determinism is what it is and we are no different from breeds of dogs, and the differences between individuals as well as groups is the same as the difference between breeds of animals, or in the case of great apes, that we are effectively as different a series of species as are bonobos and chimpanzees. This is totally intolerable to the feminine-marxist-postmodernist-feminist dysgenic religion of pseudoscience, sophism, and denialism, invented by boas, marx, freud, adorno, and derrida etc as a counter-revolution against Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, Maxwell, Poincare, and the second, german, scientific revolution. The eugenicists were right and the chinese will get there first and they will win the war – unless we end the pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit of the left cult of equality.