Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Women using P Against GSRRM

    Feb 13, 2020, 2:38 PM by James Dmitro Makienko [M]y wife is an aspie, and she is in a fashion industry, which is rife with GSRRM. She tried everything, until she “read Doolittle” (c) and learned some P-concepts. Mainly she uses a meta-term “manipulation” as a catch-all for GSRRM and other feminine cognition shit they use. She calls them out on manipulation. They usually respond with more GSRRM. Then she says “you are using ORRGSM+M(manipulation) to manipulate me into going against my interests, and I am not falling for it”. Then they try it again. She repeats herself and adds “and since you use manipulation, instead of logic and reason, you are a bad person, with a dark agenda, who is trying to take me for a fool, but I am not falling for it”. She keeps repeating it until manipulators run away – when you expose them they run out of options they can use. She also read up on dark triad traits on manipulative behaviors of sociopaths and narcissists and found things like “Framing” – (“if you are a good girl/christian/X you will do Y and go against your interests to serve my interests”) which are also used with GSRRM. Calmly exposing manipulative tactics with a precisely defined technical term works for her to disarm those who use GSRRM.

  • RT @Steve_Sailer: Compare my review of Charles Murray’s “Human Diversity” to the

    RT @Steve_Sailer: Compare my review of Charles Murray’s “Human Diversity” to the New York Times’ review at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/books/review-human-diversity-charles-murray.html?searchResultPosition=1

    https:/…

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 01:07:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228123647870717953

  • WOMEN USING P AGAINST GSRRM by James Dmitro Makienko My wife is an aspie, and sh

    WOMEN USING P AGAINST GSRRM

    by James Dmitro Makienko

    My wife is an aspie, and she is in a fashion industry, which is rife with GSRRM. She tried everything, until she “read Doolittle” (c) and learned some P-concepts.

    Mainly she uses a meta-term “manipulation” as a catch-all for GSRRM and other feminine cognition shit they use. She calls them out on manipulation. They usually respond with more GSRRM. Then she says “you are using ORRGSM+M(manipulation) to manipulate me into going against my interests, and I am not falling for it”. Then they try it again. She repeats herself and adds “and since you use manipulation, instead of logic and reason, you are a bad person, with a dark agenda, who is trying to take me for a fool, but I am not falling for it”. She keeps repeating it until manipulators run away – when you expose them they run out of options they can use.

    She also read up on dark triad traits on manipulative behaviors of sociopaths and narcissists and found things like “Framing” – (“if you are a good girl/christian/X you will do Y and go against your interests to serve my interests”) which are also used with GSRRM.

    Calmly exposing manipulative tactics with a precisely defined technical term works for her to disarm those who use GSRRM.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 14:38:00 UTC

  • What is the purpose of GSRRM? Truth suppression. And why do they suppress the tr

    What is the purpose of GSRRM? Truth suppression. And why do they suppress the truth of human differences? Truth suppression. And why? Theft. And why? Dysgenia.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 10:29:00 UTC

  • (Little old Lady: “Ooh. James Marsden. I’d like to take him to a hotel, mmm….

    (Little old Lady: “Ooh. James Marsden. I’d like to take him to a hotel, mmm…. and right to bed.”

    Me: (laughing) “Why isn’t it ok when I say “I wonder if I could get her to spend a week in five star hotel with me?”

    Little Old Lady “Because mine is all imagination, and yours is a possibility.”

    Me: (laughing) “I think you mean ambition – not possibility.”)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 09:28:00 UTC

  • “The mandatory response to having ‘Incel’ thrown at you is to offer your sympath

    —“The mandatory response to having ‘Incel’ thrown at you is to offer your sympathies for their dad issues and reproductive problems.”—Zach Edward

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-13 08:50:00 UTC

  • Women function by seduction of men by sex and affection,women by attention and a

    Women function by seduction of men by sex and affection,women by attention and alliance, children by affection, caretaking and protection,so trying to get women to stop using seduction masculinize them. The question isn’t whether they’re seducing, but whether the promise is true.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 17:03:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227639393508306945

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227634002963697664

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227634002963697664

  • 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of

    7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality,the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.
    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:54:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227350146196942849

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

  • 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little ag

    6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:52:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

  • 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the femal

    5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:51:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673