Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • We don’t hate. We merely test for reciprocity in display word and deed, includin

    We don’t hate. We merely test for reciprocity in display word and deed, including that reciprocity of truth, and particularly truth before face, regardless of cost.

    Women are less conscious of their instincts and their purpose than men, especially hyperconsumption and dysgenia.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 17:00:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251556138186870786

    Reply addressees: @buldursgait @DeguTanya @BepDelta @Dark_TossEX @MarfamSilva @paxchristus0 @ReadLinkola

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251547120995352576

  • THE DIFFERENCE by Scott De Warren Right wing – ensure productivity outpaces repr

    THE DIFFERENCE

    by Scott De Warren

    Right wing – ensure productivity outpaces reproductivity, ensuring prosperity (demand for capitalization). (Male)

    Left wing – ensure reproductivity outpaces productivity, ensuring poverty. (demand for redistribution). (Female)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 13:08:00 UTC

  • QUESTION– Curt; in the paragraph: —Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), p

    –QUESTION–

    Curt; in the paragraph:

    —Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by: (a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.’—

    Here, under (a), it says that Marxism is an attempt at deception by claiming European self-determination, tripartism and religious… (etc)

    Should that not read ‘undermining’, rather than claiming. They don’t claim those things, they undermine them.

    I don’t know if I’m missing something, here?

    It also says their competitive advantage is oppression? Technically aren’t the competitive advantages of the left AND right oppression? The left oppress the objectively strong, the right suppress (oppress) the objectively weak.

    I just want a little clarification here, that’s all. Thanks.

    –RESPONSE–

    Well you know, i) i write long complex sentences, including parentheticals and series, ii) I leave out what I consider extra words. And, that’s sometimes a burden. This comes from writing programming code, and it’s the combination of law, economics, programming, and the foundations of mathematics that let me develop P-law. So there is a high correlation between my sentence structure and programming code. In the four paragraphs below I’ve broken up the single paragraph into its constituent phrases and added back what I consider unnecessary terms in brackets [ ], resulting in

    “…Claiming that (all this stuff) is oppression (by these people).”

    “{(a) claiming [that] }

    …

    {european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, [that limits] us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection [ in markets that existed before them,] by individually demonstrated behavior, }

    …

    {and devoting the proceeds [of surpluses] to the production of commons, [instead of funding reproduction of additional non-contributors] thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people [who are contributors], and their competitive advantage [against competing peoples]}

    …

    {is oppression [by the middle and ruling classes], when all other peoples that did not do so [preserve natural selection using markets] were mired in poverty and suffering.}’”

    in other words, productivity must stay ahead of reproduction.

    What I could have said is that:

    “Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by: (a) claiming they’re oppressed by ….”

    Or some variation thereof.

    -Cheers

    —“Right wing – ensure productivity outpaces reproductivity, ensuring prosperity. Left wing – ensure reproductivity outpaces productivity, ensuring poverty (demand for redistribution).”—Scott De Warren

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 12:34:00 UTC

  • THE HIERARCHY OF POSSIBILITIES PREVENTS ERROR By Lucas Cort SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINA

    THE HIERARCHY OF POSSIBILITIES PREVENTS ERROR

    By Lucas Cort

    SOVEREIGNTY – DOMINANT MALE

    The male strategy creates sovereignty IN FACT – violence and Law – establishment of action, preservation and insurance between insurers.

    FREEDOM – ALL

    Those Sovereigns then grant PERMISSION to those of lesser insurance or specializations in the division of labour to act within the limits of that permission(markets) what we call FREEDOM.

    If FREEDOM is used as the starting point without understanding the necessity for sovereignty that makes freedom possible, then men will not pay the cost of defending the sovereigns who create freedom.

    LIBERTY – ASCENDANT MALE

    The ascendant male navigates the permissible freedom with LIBERTY(agency, autonomy).

    If LIBERTY is used the starting point without understanding the necessity for the larger structures of permission and insurance to uphold that permission, the idea of liberty (autonomy) can undermine the very thing that allows it to survive through entitlement (false priors) and possible negative externalities that undermine group cohesion (think libertarianism – baiting into hazard, etc).

    REDISTRIBUTION – FEMALE

    This can be divided further into the female strategy, which has the primarily focus on empathy using social transactions to create redistribution within the group.

    If REDISTRIBUTION is used as the starting point, first entitlement devoid merit, then hyper consumption, and redistribution undermine the value of the structure that allows it to navigate, just as the ascendant male.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 10:22:00 UTC

  • (little old lady humor) Me: (tauting) “Mom. Why are women so susceptible to magi

    (little old lady humor)

    Me: (tauting) “Mom. Why are women so susceptible to magical beliefs?”

    Her: “So we can believe there is hope for men.”

    Me: (rolling laughter) “It’s so that they have hope for their children and continue to care for them.”

    Her: “Well, that works for men too…”

    Me: “I saw that coming”

    Her: “uh huh….”

    The little old lady fan club.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 08:04:00 UTC

  • DEFINE: CELLULAR DAMAGE —“Curt: What do you mean by “cellular damage”?”—Dani

    DEFINE: CELLULAR DAMAGE

    —“Curt: What do you mean by “cellular damage”?”—Daniel Roland Anderson

    XX vs XY. Two chances of cellular correction vs one. This is why men live shorter lives by about ten percent. We accumulate cellular damage and we take on the high risk work in the world. When childbirth was risky the tradeoff existed. Now it doesn’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-16 02:20:00 UTC

  • THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE WILL RETURN TO HISTORICAL NORM – AND THAT’S NOT MONOGAMY

    THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE WILL RETURN TO HISTORICAL NORM – AND THAT’S NOT MONOGAMY

    During most of agrarian age history, when man and woman married they could divide labor of creating common property (household) so that man could have a tribe and woman a nest, and both freedom from parental control over the allocation of resources.

    Getting married meant freedom and sovereignty. A lot. This was true until the postwar boom.

    In the present age, unless a woman wants to raise replacement levels of children, children are now an amusement, and men are an unnecessary and more easily sacrificed cost.

    Without the need for children’s support in old age there is no incentive to have them sufficient to preserve the incentive to invest in marriage and replacement level children.

    Social Security was suicidal. The pill added a noose. No fault divorce created the hanging tree.

    We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or proposals from men.

    Briffault clarifies by asserting that intimate relationships between men and women result from a calculated cost/benefit analysis by women.

    Will she or won’t she acquire a net gain from any relationship with the man? This does not necessarily mean monetary gain, although it might. Other types of gain might be social status, sexual compatibility, anticipated future happiness, emotional security, and the male’s capacity for fatherhood.

    Men are costly for a woman in attention, emotion, time, effort and reproductive opportunity – and her children take priority over him. Their value at present is largely income and status and that is decreasingly immaterial.

    Women are costly for men in his specialization, lower adaptivity to new groups, his cellular damage, his shorter life span, his shorter working life, and his shorter savings horizon, and his reproductive opportunity.

    But a woman’s care is extremely valuable to a man. He trades all these things for the care of a woman. Unless both parties stay socialized and fit, sex dissipates quickly.

    It isn’t clear that agrarian marriage can continue as a majority habit and it’s more likely we will continue to return to human norms of serial monogamy, treating relationships like careers, except for the upper classes that as always gain so much value from shared assets status shared oppporutnity that the economics still make sense.

    ===

    (Some content in this post is from John Brennan)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 16:45:00 UTC

  • RELIGION AND CONSPIRACY THEORY SHARE THE SAME ERROR OF FEMININE COGNITION: IMPUT

    RELIGION AND CONSPIRACY THEORY SHARE THE SAME ERROR OF FEMININE COGNITION: IMPUTATION OF INTENT

    (possibly important)

    —“Pattern recognition isn’t the problem, it’s the “imputing conscious intent” where none exists or cannot be demonstrated.”— (Daniel and others)

    Why? Bias of brain and subsequent consciousness to think through an empathic lens rather than a systemic and material lens. The herd bias of empathy when grazing vs the pack bias of systems when hunting. The masculine brain sees systems where the feminine brain sees intentions.

    There is a place for religion and it is a necessary place for the mammal inside.

    DEBT: Where worship means demonstration of appreciation for inheritance: debt.

    – Nature worship (debt)

    – Kin and Ancestor worship (debt)

    – Gods, demigods, heroes and saints worship (debt)

    CAPITALIZATION: And training in mindfulness:

    – Action: Heroism – achievement (cost)

    – Reason: stoicism – self authoring (cost)

    – Experience: epicureanism – community building (cost)

    REWARD: And the Ritual of the Feast – building community.

    – The Gathering, The Fire, The Call (reward)

    – The Parable, The Oath, the Testimony (reward)

    – The Sacrifice, The Feast, The Thanks (reward)

    – The Celebration (festival), The Sport(competition), The Dispersal (rest) (reward)

    RULES: There are three sets of laws evident in the structure of the universe whether those laws were made by structural consequence, the design of divinity, or the hand of god.

    – The laws of nature. (physical limits)

    – The natural law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity (personal limits)

    … – With the christian law of love improving upon natural law

    – The evolutionary law of transcendence of man into gods. (political limits)

    Grow up, Man up, Shut up, Show up.

    And win.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 10:21:00 UTC

  • Moral Foundations COMPLETED @JonHaidt #MoralFoundations There are only three wea

    Moral Foundations COMPLETED @JonHaidt #MoralFoundations There are only three wea

    Moral Foundations COMPLETED
    @JonHaidt #MoralFoundations
    There are only three weapons of coercion available – and we specialize in them.
    Any equilibrium requires three forces.
    Two sexes are optimum, but three strategies (three bodies) are required to maintain their equilibrium. https://t.co/mVthGKH6Kd

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:40:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250086451993346048

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93226050_257050209026473_58142185528

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93226050_257050209026473_58142185528

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93226050_257050209026473_5814218552831377408_o_257050202359807.jpg PREFERENCES FOR GOVERNMENT BY MORAL INTUITION THAT REFLECTS REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGYPREFERENCES FOR GOVERNMENT BY MORAL INTUITION THAT REFLECTS REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 09:45:00 UTC