Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • We Differ in Priority Not in Purpose

    Apr 22, 2020, 6:21 PM My argument is that the faithful cannot abandon belief, and the rational cannot adopt faith – and that the tendency in favor of either is demonstrably genetic as well as cultural in origin. We cannot legislate belief or unbelief. So all we can do is trade. Traditionally european civilization has practiced trifunctionalism: the militiary-masculine(dominance)-political, and the commercial-judicial, and the religious-feminine(submissive)-familial. And as such we can trade loyalty to one another under natural law. The law is empirical and reciprocal and trade is the only possible means of reciprocity between the aristocratic-martial and the noble-faithful. The purpose here is to (a) remind both parties that we have always been tri-functional, and it is part of our success, (b) that the difference is priority between Pagan (heroic) martial, heathen(scientific) legal, and christian (subservient) faithful – not a difference but a difference in priority. (c) that we can trade loyalty to one another (d) that this is what we have always done. (e) and that I can only write the law that moderates dominance-force and submission-resistance with scientific law. I am a heathen(judicial-nature) first, a pagan(martial-war) second, and a christian(faith-love) third. But I am all three. Because that is my ROLE in civilization. Each of us that ‘cares’ fulfills a role in the hierarchy of the three competing groups of elites. We advance a strategy under elites of Martial-Defense, Legal-Scientific, or Faithful-Resistance 

    Six Permutations of Priority:
M=Martial .. L=Legal .... F= Faithful
M L F .... .... L F M .... .... F L M
M F L .... .... L M F .... .... F M L

    We divide the labor of our civilization, not by exclusivity but by priority of our three weapons of influence.

  • We Differ in Priority Not in Purpose

    Apr 22, 2020, 6:21 PM My argument is that the faithful cannot abandon belief, and the rational cannot adopt faith – and that the tendency in favor of either is demonstrably genetic as well as cultural in origin. We cannot legislate belief or unbelief. So all we can do is trade. Traditionally european civilization has practiced trifunctionalism: the militiary-masculine(dominance)-political, and the commercial-judicial, and the religious-feminine(submissive)-familial. And as such we can trade loyalty to one another under natural law. The law is empirical and reciprocal and trade is the only possible means of reciprocity between the aristocratic-martial and the noble-faithful. The purpose here is to (a) remind both parties that we have always been tri-functional, and it is part of our success, (b) that the difference is priority between Pagan (heroic) martial, heathen(scientific) legal, and christian (subservient) faithful – not a difference but a difference in priority. (c) that we can trade loyalty to one another (d) that this is what we have always done. (e) and that I can only write the law that moderates dominance-force and submission-resistance with scientific law. I am a heathen(judicial-nature) first, a pagan(martial-war) second, and a christian(faith-love) third. But I am all three. Because that is my ROLE in civilization. Each of us that ‘cares’ fulfills a role in the hierarchy of the three competing groups of elites. We advance a strategy under elites of Martial-Defense, Legal-Scientific, or Faithful-Resistance 

    Six Permutations of Priority:
M=Martial .. L=Legal .... F= Faithful
M L F .... .... L F M .... .... F L M
M F L .... .... L M F .... .... F M L

    We divide the labor of our civilization, not by exclusivity but by priority of our three weapons of influence.

  • Male Female Cognition in Math Is Insightful

    Apr 25, 2020, 10:11 AM MALE FEMALE COGNITION IN MATH IS INSIGHTFUL Very interesting insight into mathematics is that the mathematicians who by far, best explain mathematics as a language are women. While the mathematicians that practice mathematics have a tendency to platonism. This is interesting in that for men the spatial-mathematical world is existential and for women its predominantly verbal. And we see this same differences in gender behavior across the spectrum with women providing empirical insight and men providing theoretical insight. Just as we see in all workplaces women are usually superior at many empirical details and certainty and men are superior at coalescing theoretical innovations and risks. To educate people in ‘what is math’ (a language of positional names) I would interview four specific women. If I wanted to educate people in the language of logic-proper I’d ask one woman. If I wanted to extend mathematics from points to geometric combinatorics (i do) I’d interview the same number of men. Just odd that it’s so obvious when you look at the best people in every field. Same in economics. Elinor Ostrom. Empirical not theoretical. Same in computing. Babbage and his wife. Einstein and his significant other. (My ex-wife Allora and I in biz for that matter.) Fascinating.

  • Male Female Cognition in Math Is Insightful

    Apr 25, 2020, 10:11 AM MALE FEMALE COGNITION IN MATH IS INSIGHTFUL Very interesting insight into mathematics is that the mathematicians who by far, best explain mathematics as a language are women. While the mathematicians that practice mathematics have a tendency to platonism. This is interesting in that for men the spatial-mathematical world is existential and for women its predominantly verbal. And we see this same differences in gender behavior across the spectrum with women providing empirical insight and men providing theoretical insight. Just as we see in all workplaces women are usually superior at many empirical details and certainty and men are superior at coalescing theoretical innovations and risks. To educate people in ‘what is math’ (a language of positional names) I would interview four specific women. If I wanted to educate people in the language of logic-proper I’d ask one woman. If I wanted to extend mathematics from points to geometric combinatorics (i do) I’d interview the same number of men. Just odd that it’s so obvious when you look at the best people in every field. Same in economics. Elinor Ostrom. Empirical not theoretical. Same in computing. Babbage and his wife. Einstein and his significant other. (My ex-wife Allora and I in biz for that matter.) Fascinating.

  • FYI: the difference between Left (cognitively female bias) and right (cognitivel

    FYI: the difference between Left (cognitively female bias) and right (cognitively male bias) is as expected: Female neuroticism, hyperconsumption, hypergamy, impulsivity and moral specialization, vs Male disgust, capitalization, hierarchy, agency, and moral completeness.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:30:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263598053182734341

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263593943205163011

  • But again, truth is an alien intuition for the female, which is why you like the

    But again, truth is an alien intuition for the female, which is why you like the rest, will use preference to substitute and lie endlessly to justify that preferences are truths.

    Otherwise we wouldn’t have university gut courses in postmodernism (lying) and feminism (denial).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:20:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263595468178649090

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263595051143196672

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717 It’s murder plain and simple because it’s the intentional termination of a human life. Women have been murdering children since the dawn of time. Women have murdered more children than men have killed each other in wars. That women can do it in the womb early is the only novelty.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1263595051143196672

  • It’s murder plain and simple because it’s the intentional termination of a human

    It’s murder plain and simple because it’s the intentional termination of a human life. Women have been murdering children since the dawn of time. Women have murdered more children than men have killed each other in wars. That women can do it in the womb early is the only novelty.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:18:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263595051143196672

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263593943205163011

  • And that is a technical way of agreeing with you. That said, we made many errors

    And that is a technical way of agreeing with you.

    That said, we made many errors in the 20th century not the least of which were blank slate, nature nurture, the malleability of mankind,equality of ability, individual agency, and natural morality. All of which are false.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:16:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263594454633508870

    Reply addressees: @Maroeladalx10DB @TheRealFMCH @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263594015116541959

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Maroeladalx10DB @TheRealFMCH @laurenboebert @austere1717 (f) the moment we made healthcare and abortion or profit industries – instead of maintaining them as largely religious non profits – we opened the door to attracting people with perverse psychological and anti-social axes to grind as rebellion against their instinct and status.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1263594015116541959

  • Well, (a) well all are born with male or female cognitive biases. (b) our moral

    Well, (a) well all are born with male or female cognitive biases. (b) our moral intuitions reflect our reproductive strategy, (c) we don’t have control over our moral intuitions. (d) people make excuses (justify them), (e) and never change them. That’s why we need legal science.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263593133872308225

    Reply addressees: @Maroeladalx10DB @TheRealFMCH @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263563165855551488

  • We allow women to murder and fail to take responsibility for their actions becau

    We allow women to murder and fail to take responsibility for their actions because they historically pursue risky abortions, murder their infants, or mistreat their young, reduce their marriage value, remain in poverty, and externalize all those harms on the rest of us.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 20:02:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263560902743375872

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263559811867848704

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717 Actually, it’s the most difficult question of law. Rights are exchanged. So no it’s not a property right. Its irreciproal. So no it’s not a right. It’s decided by consequences.And because we coddle women. We don’t hold them responsible for their actions. We allow them to murder.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1263559811867848704