Theme: Sex Differences

Apr 3, 2020, 11:23 AM Again. What do you think I was saying?

“Game is cognitive behavioral therapy for infantilized males (at the expense of infantilized females, caused by the tendency of women to infantilize, because the infantile are easily manipulated by seduction across the infant-child-female-male spectrum, and this is why we must return to separating boys and girls in education, just as we must return to overlapping ‘one room school’, separated by ability, and even race given our differences in rates of maturity, emphasis on fitness, on competition, and the high cost of doing so.”

In other words, I was being critical of ‘game’ as compensating for the dominance of feminism in education. You didn’t get the irony. And then you personalized it. And then you retaliated against it. Without seeking to understand it. To determine whether it was true regardless of whether it was desirable. Which is what women tend to do:

1. NAXALT,
2. Personalize,
3. Conflate desirable with truth,
4. use GSRRM to undermine the truth,
5. use GSRRM to undermine the truth speaker,
6. manipulate to circumvent the truth, and;
7. encourage infantilism to preserve the ability to manipulate, 8. because women’s instincts are dysgenic because of the high cost of her offspring. And the monotheistic religions of the old world, and the pseudoscientific religions of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD Denialism are both means of satisfying women’s (and weak men’s) intuitions to preserve investments regardless of their merit, just as men’s intuitions are to preserve investments by the advancement of merit.

Now, I don’t believe men and women have any control over these instincts – that is, until we learn to have agency. Men have had thousands of years to learn to develop institutions that force them to have agency, rather than engage in political and physical super-predation. But women have had less than a century to develop institutions that force them to have agency rather than engage in social and interpersonal super-predation. And the 20th century collapse of civilization has been made possible by the use of pseudoscience sophistry, denial and deceit to sell the false promise of escape from Darwin, Malthus, and the compromises between Genders and classes ameliorated by our use of the law of tort, truthful testimony, and the jury. Women live longer, are coddled by both men and women, Create 70% of college debt, but a minority of ‘real’ degrees, determine elections, consume 70% of government resources, but spend 70% of family income, are the target of 90%+ of advertising, determine what propaganda and media is produced, are privileged in divorce, demand economic privilege at every opportunity, where only white males between 30-50 are net tax contributors, die earlier, get lest medical investment, are more likely to suicide because of it. So if women are the vector for despotic political religion in the ancient world and despotic political pseudo-religion in the modern, and are responsible for immigration, taxation, the dismantlement of the constitution, and the civili society because their instincts are dysgenic, then what reforms are necessary to bring women into parity with men with equal suppression of their harmful instincts? I mean, talk about hyperconsumption. I mean, talk about consumption of civilizational capital. It’s not men doing it. It’s women. Who are totally unconscious of their selfishness. P-law eliminates the use of seduction to bait women (and weak men) into hazard by appeal to their intuitions in favor of dysgenia and decline (the instinct of the herd), because that was the primary criminal invention of the 20th century – a repeat of the jewish and christian invention of criminality in the first century – this time by sophism, pseudoscience, and denial, instead of the occult. So all of that was underneath the post. You just didn’t think it through. Because you leapt to your feelings. You didn’t demonstrate agency. And it is agency that separates human from animal. If men did the same we would be back in an era of continuous domestic violence. Instead we are in a period where men largely control their physical violence, and women do not control their social violence. I think things through. If you ever think I am wrong. Then either you don’t understand. Or the animal inside is talking so you can’t Not the human we seek to build on top of it.

Apr 3, 2020, 11:23 AM Again. What do you think I was saying?

“Game is cognitive behavioral therapy for infantilized males (at the expense of infantilized females, caused by the tendency of women to infantilize, because the infantile are easily manipulated by seduction across the infant-child-female-male spectrum, and this is why we must return to separating boys and girls in education, just as we must return to overlapping ‘one room school’, separated by ability, and even race given our differences in rates of maturity, emphasis on fitness, on competition, and the high cost of doing so.”

In other words, I was being critical of ‘game’ as compensating for the dominance of feminism in education. You didn’t get the irony. And then you personalized it. And then you retaliated against it. Without seeking to understand it. To determine whether it was true regardless of whether it was desirable. Which is what women tend to do:

1. NAXALT,
2. Personalize,
3. Conflate desirable with truth,
4. use GSRRM to undermine the truth,
5. use GSRRM to undermine the truth speaker,
6. manipulate to circumvent the truth, and;
7. encourage infantilism to preserve the ability to manipulate, 8. because women’s instincts are dysgenic because of the high cost of her offspring. And the monotheistic religions of the old world, and the pseudoscientific religions of marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and HBD Denialism are both means of satisfying women’s (and weak men’s) intuitions to preserve investments regardless of their merit, just as men’s intuitions are to preserve investments by the advancement of merit.

Now, I don’t believe men and women have any control over these instincts – that is, until we learn to have agency. Men have had thousands of years to learn to develop institutions that force them to have agency, rather than engage in political and physical super-predation. But women have had less than a century to develop institutions that force them to have agency rather than engage in social and interpersonal super-predation. And the 20th century collapse of civilization has been made possible by the use of pseudoscience sophistry, denial and deceit to sell the false promise of escape from Darwin, Malthus, and the compromises between Genders and classes ameliorated by our use of the law of tort, truthful testimony, and the jury. Women live longer, are coddled by both men and women, Create 70% of college debt, but a minority of ‘real’ degrees, determine elections, consume 70% of government resources, but spend 70% of family income, are the target of 90%+ of advertising, determine what propaganda and media is produced, are privileged in divorce, demand economic privilege at every opportunity, where only white males between 30-50 are net tax contributors, die earlier, get lest medical investment, are more likely to suicide because of it. So if women are the vector for despotic political religion in the ancient world and despotic political pseudo-religion in the modern, and are responsible for immigration, taxation, the dismantlement of the constitution, and the civili society because their instincts are dysgenic, then what reforms are necessary to bring women into parity with men with equal suppression of their harmful instincts? I mean, talk about hyperconsumption. I mean, talk about consumption of civilizational capital. It’s not men doing it. It’s women. Who are totally unconscious of their selfishness. P-law eliminates the use of seduction to bait women (and weak men) into hazard by appeal to their intuitions in favor of dysgenia and decline (the instinct of the herd), because that was the primary criminal invention of the 20th century – a repeat of the jewish and christian invention of criminality in the first century – this time by sophism, pseudoscience, and denial, instead of the occult. So all of that was underneath the post. You just didn’t think it through. Because you leapt to your feelings. You didn’t demonstrate agency. And it is agency that separates human from animal. If men did the same we would be back in an era of continuous domestic violence. Instead we are in a period where men largely control their physical violence, and women do not control their social violence. I think things through. If you ever think I am wrong. Then either you don’t understand. Or the animal inside is talking so you can’t Not the human we seek to build on top of it.