Recent data is in line with my opinion: they mature less and are less dimorphic, and as such their intelligence advantage does not continue to scale like ours with age. In other words, they have a youth advantage. But it does not persist. Meanwhile, we keep getting ‘smarter’ by about a point every three years. I suspect this is due to differences in the advantage of verbal ability, and also explains why the Ashkenazim retain that advantage throughout life. Again, mathematics and spatial reasoning are a form of calculation, but so is language. And keeping them in relation (europeans) is something that the Ashkenazim do not do (like all Semites verbalism seems to be endemically ideal), and the east Asians have a huge population to draw from and their need for order helps their bureaucracies evolve into talent pools. So again neoteny, rate of maturity, gender differences in brain development are the primary differentiators in human groups (species). our only problem is rates of reproduction of our classes reversing our many centuries of eugenics.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Men are business problems for women. Women are sustenance problems for men. 😉
Men are business problems for women. Women are sustenance problems for men. 😉 https://t.co/fPQ3e90GV3
-
Men are business problems for women. Women are sustenance problems for men. 😉
Men are business problems for women. Women are sustenance problems for men. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/men-are-business-problems-for-women-women-are-sustenance-problems-for-men/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 01:02:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266897758449012737
-
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men https://t.co/cn089EL5G2
-
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/the-argument-is-that-women-dont-love-their-men/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 01:01:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266897467179708417
-
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men
Hey so, you know, the argument is that women don’t love their men. That men are disposable. Men are promiscuous by nature out of reproductive necessity but women are not disposable except at the margin (sports, rock stars, etc) where the supply is infinite. The reality is that we love each other within the limits of reciprocity and proportionality, and we stay together even with only habituation within our marketability. So you know, we don’t have enough value to one another in the current order which is showing up in birth rates. And that order is only possible because of a rapidly declining asymmetry of ecnomic possibility.
-
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men
Hey so, you know, the argument is that women don’t love their men. That men are disposable. Men are promiscuous by nature out of reproductive necessity but women are not disposable except at the margin (sports, rock stars, etc) where the supply is infinite. The reality is that we love each other within the limits of reciprocity and proportionality, and we stay together even with only habituation within our marketability. So you know, we don’t have enough value to one another in the current order which is showing up in birth rates. And that order is only possible because of a rapidly declining asymmetry of ecnomic possibility.
-
#IfIWereTheOppositeSex
#IfIWereTheOppositeSex https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/ifiweretheoppositesex/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 00:58:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266896820514553856
-
#IfIWereTheOppositeSex
#IfIWereTheOppositeSex https://t.co/HwpNm7HIJQ
