Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, and political market values, determined by those traits, we are socially(normatively), economically(competitively), and politically (demands for commons), incompatible.
Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy
-
The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, res
The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, resulting trait distributions, particularly conscientiousness and intelligence produce different ‘challenges’ in normalizing behavior between groups.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 19:37:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267178489897201665
Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267177565048930304
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, because they survive daily falsification by millions of us. That said, data matches the stereotypes. But It wasn’t until genetics we knew why: Neoteny & Class Distribution.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1267177565048930304
-
The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, res
The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, resulting trait distributions, particularly conscientiousness and intelligence produce different ‘challenges’ in normalizing behavior between groups.
Reply addressees: @evrythingstays @Steve_Sailer -
What Does Gsrrm Stand For?” (Full Version)
The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval, (O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R)allying, (S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing, (U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent. This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. FULL LIST (D)enial … (D)isapproval … … (O)utrage … … … (S)haming, … … … … (M)oralizing, … … … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … … … (R)allying … … … … … … … … (G)ossiping … … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing For the purpose of: … … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction. And and preserving: … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability) … … (S)elf Image … … … (S)tatus … … … … (F)ree Riding … … … … … (R)ent Seeking … … … … … … (C)oruption … … … … … … … (P)arasitism … … … … … … … … (P)redation With their act of: … … … … … … … … … … (F)raud. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. DIAGNOSIS So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts. ADDICTION Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover. —Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
-
What Does Gsrrm Stand For?” (Full Version)
The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval, (O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R)allying, (S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing, (U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent. This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. FULL LIST (D)enial … (D)isapproval … … (O)utrage … … … (S)haming, … … … … (M)oralizing, … … … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … … … (R)allying … … … … … … … … (G)ossiping … … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing For the purpose of: … … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction. And and preserving: … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability) … … (S)elf Image … … … (S)tatus … … … … (F)ree Riding … … … … … (R)ent Seeking … … … … … … (C)oruption … … … … … … … (P)arasitism … … … … … … … … (P)redation With their act of: … … … … … … … … … … (F)raud. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. DIAGNOSIS So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts. ADDICTION Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover. —Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
-
Women in Our Arguments
Women in Our Arguments https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/women-in-our-arguments/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 16:59:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267138688032571396
-
Women in Our Arguments
Women in Our Arguments https://t.co/3er7ZoGFYv
-
Women in Our Arguments
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do). It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity. What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. ) Hugs. Edit
-
Women in Our Arguments
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do). It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity. What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. ) Hugs. Edit
-
Because white people are less aggressive, impulsive, and violent, and black peop
Because white people are less aggressive, impulsive, and violent, and black people fight and resist endlessly, causing the officers to escalate.
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 04:31:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266950283638312960
Reply addressees: @MichaelRapaport @erecasner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266801862772047873