RT @WalterIII: MOMENTUM MATTERS TO THE MASCULINE MIND
Whereas the Feminine Mind is focused on Experiences in the present moment(flowers),…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 19:14:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798070844104774095
RT @WalterIII: MOMENTUM MATTERS TO THE MASCULINE MIND
Whereas the Feminine Mind is focused on Experiences in the present moment(flowers),…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 19:14:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798070844104774095
RT @youve_got_toby: @DegenRolf Demonstrated repeatedly, yet feminists have trouble with this, resulting in Schrödinger’s dimorphism.
Sex-as…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:11:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797979375088160925
“Sex Differences in Dark Triad Traits are sensitive to the Human Development Index”
Meaning: humans require external social, economic, and material regulation of antisocial behaviors. (more mouse utopia). Just as cells require information from the environment and other cells and… https://twitter.com/minimus_maximus/status/1797875146994356689
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:08:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797978803051905154
Study: Emergent Sex Differences as Environmental Stressors Are Reduced. (Legit)
Related: Our own Luke Weinhagen (@LukeWeinhagen) emphasizes the divergence that occurs when not only stressors are reduced but when we disassociate from understanding how to mediate them – producing… https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1797856097186828638
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-04 13:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797977840190730688
RT @curtdoolittle: ONCE YOU SEE IT, YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT
Carl Jung (european, cognitively masculine)
Max Weber (european, cognitively mascul…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 22:05:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797389111113765121
RT @curtdoolittle: @enhanced_vibes RESISTANCE TO THE TRUTH OF FEMALE ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR.
–“W.T. ever loving F is meant by this?! Abrahami…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 04:34:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797124568835924009
First, it’s visible in simple photographs (symmetry in particular), second in IQ distribution, third in academic, economic, social and mating results, third it is persistent over hundreds of years.
It’s late for me, so I don’t want to devote too much time to an answer but you would be surprised how consistent classes are over centuries. There is a tendency to think of economic class which is one of the issues, but economic class is highly dependent upon trait conscientiousness compared to social class peers. While reproductive and social class remains consistent because genetic load determines the capacity to bear responsibility for increasing complexity in time – which is, in fact, what IQ, personality, and neurological development permit.
Now imagine you’re a politician, an academic, a teacher, or even a mother, and you want people to strive to reach their potential, and furthermore, you don’t want others to deprive them of reaching their potential. So even if you have the best intentions you do not advocate for genetic determinism. That said, as a scientist at the aggregate we see genetic determinism is inescapable … at political scales.
Reply addressees: @kata_phusin
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 03:30:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797108567729745920
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797105809886793900
SUMMARY POST: HUMAN VARIATION
Human variation in concrete genetic dimensions:
1. GROUP DIFFERENCES (noeteny)
https://t.co/AQuAjgAd26
2. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (personality)
https://t.co/ZGJvdDhvdu
3. SEX DIFFERENCES (Bias)
https://t.co/CWUmeJueIn
4. GENETIC LOAD (mutation, class)
https://t.co/L4fABITNFB
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 02:28:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797092815844802560
SUMMARY POST: HUMAN VARIATION
Human variation in concrete genetic dimensions:
1. GROUP DIFFERENCES (noeteny)
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1790129172993454566
2. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (personality)
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1769785465786290202
3. SEX DIFFERENCES (Bias)
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1797089546561007878
4. GENETIC LOAD (mutation, class)…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 02:28:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797092815991640395
Reply addressees: @kata_phusin @michal_ptacnik @RokoMijic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797076969189978523
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1790129172993454566
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1769785465786290202
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1797089546561007878
SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION – AND CONSEQUENCES
Here is the short version:
1. Science consists of the process of discovering first principles(causes). We construct everything from chains of causality using first principles. It is a universal falsificationary logic.
2. The first cause and therefore first principle of human differences is sex differences. The second is degree of noetenic evolution (resulting in race) as neoteny is the direction of human evolution (domestication syndrome). The third is accumulated genetic load (resulting in class).
3. Sexes differ in cognition, speech, tactics, strategy, conflict, and warfare (see sex differences in antisocial behavior) with male force, fraud, and criminality and female manipulation, reputation destruction, and promiscuity.
4. Civilizations differ in their use of masculine and feminine strategy.
5. Religion(middle east) teaches lying and manipiulation. States (china) teach force and coercion, and Contractualism(law)(europe) teaches reciprocity and contract. (it’s much more complicated but that’s the simple version).
6) Sex differences function as a division of labor, time, and scale:
GIVEN Sex Differences in Cognition:
Feminine vs Masculine
Lateral (more) vs longitudinal Brain Organization (fast)
In Time (now) vs Over Time (then)
Direct (perceptible) vs Abstract (predicted) Causality
Empathizing vs Systematizing
Experience vs Consequence
HyperConsuming vs Capitalizing
Devotion in time vs Loyalty over time
Special Pleading/asymmetry vs Consistency/symmetry Status by Consumption w/o responsibility vs Status by Capitalizing with responsibility
Irresponsibility vs Responsibility for Commons
One/Few vs Populations/Many Small
Scale vs Large Scale
Prey(Submission) vs Preditor(Dominance)
Herd vs Packs Global vs National
Dysgenic vs Eugenic
Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)
AND GIVEN
Sex Differences in Limits:
Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
–vs–
Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.
AND GIVEN
Distribution of Sex Differences in the Population:
[masculine (systematizing) vs feminine (empathizing)] The distribution of traits is overlapping in the population distribution with a few cognitively feminine males and cognitively masculine females, as well a larger number of extreme males (autism) and extreme females (psychosis).
AS SUCH
Evolutionary Necessity of the Division of Cognition
Masculine conservatives perceive the world across time (reals) and feminine progressive perceive the world in time (feels). Progressive historians complain about history and conservative historians explain history.
Feminine in time vs Masculine over time.
Masculine minds will be better at everything at scale. But the feminine ability to intuitively manage many relationships and states of mind (children especially but other women as well is an equal advantage in the IN TIME domain.).
Unconstrained vs Constrained Visions (scarcity)
If the feminine mind did not hold the unconstrained vision, mothers would give up on their children. If the masculine mind did not hold the constrained vision, no group would survive the disorder. So, we see feminine opportunity and masculine scarcity. Evolution always divides the labor. Among humans it divides the cognitive labor of “TIME and SCALE”.
(Note: See Thomas Sowell: A Conflict of Visions)
Evolution of Differences in Cognition
Our findings are that all differences in cognition valuation and expression, other than those of genetic load or in-utero development, are caused by sex differences in the organization of the brain for the purpose of dividing the labor of the sexes into specializing in opposite time frames.
Why? Physics and Ternary Logic of the Universe.
Think of humans evolving from fast male sperm predator, and slow female egg prey if you want a humorous analogy to help you remember. But while easy to remember and somewhat humorous, the analogy is quite accurately the causality.
Explaining why this division of labor exists produces an origin of sex differences in physics and combined with differences in responsibility and status seeking provides the three causal properties that define human differences in behavior.
Nature likes ternary logic which is something we explore elsewhere if you want to twist your brain inside out on yet another issue. 😉
9) Methodology
Though our work is entirely based on the intersection between neuroscience – particularly over the past decade, and linguistic analysis (from computational linguistics) our methodology uses similar techniques to intelligence, personality, moral bias, and psychological bias testing, but we do so by constructing expression from the causality of the underlying organization of the brain (neurology) instead of deduction from from language alone. (Which has plagued psychology since its origin.)
Also See related: https://t.co/KNKUPjEub9… https://t.co/ZGJvdDhvdu… https://t.co/N6p8EyfyhQ… https://t.co/xzFbZa3qNq… https://t.co/K09FRiBZLs… https://t.co/W4ONTbyAbe
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 02:15:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797089546103906304