RT @curtdoolittle: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:
-…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525890579144789
RT @curtdoolittle: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:
-…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525890579144789
THERE ARE DIMENSIONS TO SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT…. AND HERE THEY ARE:
–“Q: CURT: Is it possible to produce a male, who is cognitively feminine, who demonstrates spectrum behaviors of Compartmentalization, Social Anxiety, ADHD and OCD?”–
Answer: of course, we find females with autism spectrum disorder who otherwise demonstrate some variation on the other sex differences. We find males with solipsism and psychosis who otherwise demonstrate some variation on the other sex differences.
WHY?
Bias in the brain: structural, procedural, valuative, reproductive, regulatory – then the consequences:
1. BIASES
(a) Structural
i. Hemispheric bias: Female prey, right hemisphere bias vs Male, predator, left hemisphere bias.
ii. Neurological organization: male more compartmentalized (less, faster. decidability, action), female integrated (more, slower, experiential, preference)
(b) Procedural
i. Temporal Bias: Female lateral in time, vs Male Longitudinal over time.
ii. Measurement Bias: Female empathizing in time vs male systematizing over time
iii: Measurement System Bias: Female verbal, pictorial, empathic bias vs male operational, spatial, systemic bias.
iv. Goal Bias: Female search for consumption as status vs male search for capital as status.
v. Risk Bias: Female evasion of risk vs male utility of risk.
iv. Responsibility Bias: Female irresponsibility (consumption bias + risk) for commons vs male responsibility for commons (capitalization bias + risk).
(c) Valuative
i. Valence, or emotional significance processing of the brain.
(d) Reproductive
i. Attraction (sexual orientation) Male traits vs female traits.
(e) Regulatory
i. Capacity (agency) to regulate impulse: female emotional impulse and flight response, vs male physical impulse and dominance response.
And at least in general terms, they develop largely in that order unless something goes wrong in utero.
2. CONSEQUENCES:
(a) Distribution All people vary on all a, b, c, d, and e axes of development, with sex stereotypes consistent at some level but biases varying somewhat in the extreme. So we can have effeminate males and masculine females but oddly enough, except at the extremes, we can still identify the sex of the individual
by watching the processing in the brain.
(b) Variation in Sex Bias in Organization: Male compartmental autism (insufficient integration) vs female integrated psychosis (insufficient compartmentalization) can occur while maintaining structural, valuative, and reproductive normalcy but the consequence is a decline in regulatory ability and therefore agency.
(c) Extreme (broken) variations can occur in a, b, c, d, or e, without the same variation occuring in the other systems.
For example, one we’re quite aware of, is that sexual development is somewhat fragile, so sexual attraction can vary while preserving all other developmental biases.
So to answer the original question, an individual can be both autistic and cognitively, and valuatively feminine without being reproductively feminine.
Affections
CD
Reply addressees: @chlamraypist @MoisheTheFried
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 19:36:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799525872778551296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799492455722578128
RT @MarioNawfal: 🚨🇺🇸DR. VAN MOL: GENDER DYSPHORIA IS A DIAGNOSIS, TRANSGENDERISM AN IDEOLOGY
Dr. Andre Van Mol of @ACPeds, Co-chair of the…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 05:10:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799307999754035609
RT @curtdoolittle: @NuSecretShopper @whatifalthist The entirety of the left (and the cognitively feminine) is to avoid self regulation, ada…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 00:47:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799241760255955303
The entirety of the left (and the cognitively feminine) is to avoid self regulation, adaptation, and responsibility. So, it’s obvious: They want control and authority to impose it. It’s not that they hate the police etc, it’s that they hate the obstacle to their power to end the suppression of their irresponsibility.
Whenever a leftist (or woman) says anything that doesn’t make sense to you, then simply look for what self regulation, adaptation, risk, responsibility accountability they’re seeking to avoid.
We teach this as as a science including the sex differences in deception and fraud and warfare.
Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-08 00:47:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799241738986422273
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799227168641138758
RT @curtdoolittle: WHY THE MASCULINE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRAIN THE PATHOLOGICAL FEMININE
GIVEN
Sex Differences in Cognition:
Fe…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 17:55:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799138186016465225
–“Modern dating is training people for divorce.”– Sadia Khan
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 14:35:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799087735430693134
He’s documenting the increase in the effect of the feminine causing the systemic suppression of the masculine.
One of the reasons for east asian animation and comics is the higher neoteny of east asians and their lower masculinity.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 20:12:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798810172942692395
Reply addressees: @Logos_Elect @simonsarris
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798807701285110210
Data is accumulating that leftism is the product of the combination of feminine cognitive bias and genetic load. I was aware of the first, but I assumed the latter was wishful thinking. Instead, the data is accumulating that leftism is the product of genetic load. We know it’s true among the radicals, but it’s simply true in general.
The Three Horsemen of Leftism:
Virtue Signaling < Feminine Cognition < Genetic Load
Reply addressees: @ryan_t_stull @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-05 19:26:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798436312011157504
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798153319011033286
THE SOVIET SECULAR INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF FEMININE > JEWISH > ABRAHAMIC SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF LYING
I have researched and documented the evolution of the feminine means of undermining, social construction, and inversion of objectively true/false with preferentially good/bad, through to the abrahamic religions and the marxist sequence.
But I underestimated the soviets as the first time an entire government had been capable of adopting the female strategy of social construction of undermining and sewing conflict using institutional organization of the use of modern communications to ‘uneducate’ people so to speak.
And it’s terrifying that this feminine means of coercion is so difficult to defend against in a high trust society like the west that favors free speech – under the presumption it’s not industrialized lying defended by the institutions of state, or organized religion (church, temple, universities).
And how difficult is defense against the feminine means of social warfare while preserving free speech, when the moral intuition of the masculine is paternal demand for individual responsibility and the feminine is to demand tolerance for irresponsibility, which only serves to bait a population into hazard, generate class conflict, and generate demand for authority, that as a consequence succeeds by eliminating freedom of speech that made that sedition and authority possible?
The only solution I know of is ‘free reciprocal and truthful speech that does not encourage irresponsibility for the private and common’ and as such does not sew the seeds of justification for discontent, bait people into hazard of irresponsibility, causing redistributive parasitism, generating demand for authority that reverses freedom of speech, sovereignty, reciprocity, responsibility, and voluntary cooperation, and the prosperity that would have resulted had those demands not been reversed.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-05 03:38:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798197750388891648