Theme: Sex Differences

  • Our Failure To Equally Domesticate Man

    1) –“Since those wolves became dogs more than 15,000 years ago, no new wolf DNA has entered dog genomes. Humans crossbred dogs and wolves, but none of the wolf DNA survived in dogs at large. Modern wolves, however, do show the incorporation of some dog DNA.”—Reich

    2) —“pigs were brought to Europe by farmers from Anatolia. But the genes of those first domesticated pigs have been completely lost, replaced by the genes of wild European boars, even though the pigs stayed domesticated animals.”—Reich

    3) The answer, of course, is that we culled aggression from dogs by preventing their breeding (or worse). We HAVEN”T culled aggression from all humans. That’s what the data says.

  • You’re rationalizing (justifying a prior again). What does evolutionary history

    You’re rationalizing (justifying a prior again). What does evolutionary history say? Why are we still selecting neanderthal genes out of the genome? What’s the difference between genocide of near genetic distance vs far genetic distance?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-01 14:39:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322911191799312391

    Reply addressees: @cbstrohl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322910601992167426

  • My personal experience with WAGS is wonderful. My personal experience with the w

    My personal experience with WAGS is wonderful. My personal experience with the whole range of female employees in tech less so, in marketing worse, in sales worse, and in bureaucracies worst of all. As an aspie, Austrian econ (the study of rational incentives) made it workable.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 23:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322688278143868934

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322686733058772992

  • There just isn’t anything really available. But it was an interesting exercise i

    There just isn’t anything really available. But it was an interesting exercise in ‘how would i make this relevant to women?” I might add ‘how women fight undermine’ but that’s mostly in academic research articles.

    You’ve got me thinking here…. hmmm….

    very good idea….


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:26:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322666253673181184

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322660968250433536

  • A Booklist for Women

    For a female psyche, what sources would you recommend to learn—-in what order?

    1) For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintain motivation. The explanatory power is empowering because it makes psychology very simple process of ‘what are you trying to get?” (b) Women have to overcome the true/not vs approval/not problem.

    2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it because it really is a superpower. Some don’t because the true/no vs approval/not dichotomy is impossible for them to overcome (lack of agency).

    3) after that the dummies guide really is just something you walk thru and practice. My opinion is that it’s a lot easier than it looks but I’d need to make ‘posters’ for that to work. There are a small number of fixed concepts. But using them together is overwhelming at first.

    4) I think for most people if you get reciprocity and property in toto you can get morality down. From there you learn verbal reciprocity (language) which is the epistemology. That’s the same Idea but more complex. Then you learn the grammars which is a simple table of ‘logics’.

    5) From there you learn disambiguation by serialization and operationalization. And from there we work through making complete sentences (transactions) in operational language. At that point you get it.

    6) Hmm… I never really thought about a reading list for women before.  The Male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine. I might add “the Essential Difference“(male and female brains) by baron-cohen.  Most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. To appeal to the female interests Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior.  Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons).   And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful

    7) That’s really what’s needed. That’s it. 

     

  • A Booklist for Women

    For a female psyche, what sources would you recommend to learn—-in what order?

    1) For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintain motivation. The explanatory power is empowering because it makes psychology very simple process of ‘what are you trying to get?” (b) Women have to overcome the true/not vs approval/not problem.

    2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it because it really is a superpower. Some don’t because the true/no vs approval/not dichotomy is impossible for them to overcome (lack of agency).

    3) after that the dummies guide really is just something you walk thru and practice. My opinion is that it’s a lot easier than it looks but I’d need to make ‘posters’ for that to work. There are a small number of fixed concepts. But using them together is overwhelming at first.

    4) I think for most people if you get reciprocity and property in toto you can get morality down. From there you learn verbal reciprocity (language) which is the epistemology. That’s the same Idea but more complex. Then you learn the grammars which is a simple table of ‘logics’.

    5) From there you learn disambiguation by serialization and operationalization. And from there we work through making complete sentences (transactions) in operational language. At that point you get it.

    6) Hmm… I never really thought about a reading list for women before.  The Male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine. I might add “the Essential Difference“(male and female brains) by baron-cohen.  Most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. To appeal to the female interests Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior.  Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons).   And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful

    7) That’s really what’s needed. That’s it. 

     

  • 8) You know it’s funny. But men don’t need to read these books because we think

    8) You know it’s funny. But men don’t need to read these books because we think in terms of territory, resources, and competitors. Just as women ignore men and treat them as cash machines, men (mostly) treat women like a herd they have to protect from outsiders, and not over-eat.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322662010446893056

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322661486792216578


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 7) I never really thought about a reading list for women before. That’s really intersting. I might add “the Essential Difference”(male female brains). by baron-cohen. The male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322661486792216578

  • 7) I never really thought about a reading list for women before. That’s really i

    7) I never really thought about a reading list for women before. That’s really intersting. I might add “the Essential Difference”(male female brains). by baron-cohen. The male Brain and the Female Brain, both by Louann Brizendine.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 22:07:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322661486792216578

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322660561532776448


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 6) Hmm… most people need to read Economics in One Lesson. Gary becker’s books A Treatise on the Family, or The Economics of Human Behavior. And maybe Jane Jacobs Economy of Cities and Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful. Something by Elenor Ostrom (commons).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322660561532776448

  • 2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it

    2) So you have to add a step of self-reflection and analysis. Some women love it because it really is a superpower. Some don’t because the true/no vs approval/not dichotomy is impossible for them to overcome (lack of agency).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:53:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322658006627160065

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322657658340581376


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintain motivation. The explanatory power is empowering because it makes psychology very simple process of ‘what are you trying to get?” (b) Women have to overcome the true/not vs approval/not problem.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322657658340581376

  • For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintai

    For women the primary difficulties are (a) it has to be useful to you to maintain motivation. The explanatory power is empowering because it makes psychology very simple process of ‘what are you trying to get?” (b) Women have to overcome the true/not vs approval/not problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:52:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322657658340581376

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322655075232321536