Androgeny to males is equal to giving it away to females. Same issue, same response. Discounts the market.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 20:26:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323723337974108163
Androgeny to males is equal to giving it away to females. Same issue, same response. Discounts the market.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 20:26:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323723337974108163
15) All that remains is documenting the ‘tendency’ of which pathways form, and our biological differences in their formation, energy supply, and energy cost. (Elon Musk was promising this but most of us assume it’s going to either fail, or be solved non-mechanically.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 19:38:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323711069924270083
Reply addressees: @nosilverv
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323710676402130947
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@nosilverv 13) In the past five to ten years, and somewhat in the past two we have largely formed a working model of the brain and it’s deceptively uncomplicated and disturbingly similar to a 3d video game. (really)
14) as far as I know all the ‘magic and mystery’ of the brain is gone.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1323710676402130947
I use data. Not only correlative data but causal data. And I’m illustrating female incentives if not disciplined by conformity. Sorry. I don’t err. Don’t waste my time without references. I have huge book, bibliography and cite references on my site. Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 18:18:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323691033662803968
Reply addressees: @Jewthulhu @dhmiv
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323689824377729024
4. This results in failure of maturity (adaptation), failure to learn to adapt, failure to learn the importance of adaptation, and girls who are shallow and emotionally fragile and boys that never develop a vested (demonstrated) interest in the commons (or society).
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 18:15:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323690263856975873
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323690262066008066
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3. So in pursuit of harmony (not finding the place that you can add value to the hierarchy of the team) we create people who are incompetent, overconfident, destined to fail in the market, and destined to hate the civilization’s false promise to them.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1323690262066008066
Study is a measurement of approval of the observer (male) rather than participant (female). It doesn’t change the fact that it’s androgenic, and developmentally harmful.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 18:00:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323686486219378688
Reply addressees: @LRRHBakery
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323685939944644608
Has anyone done a study on the effect of anime on the arrested development of Japanese and American boys? Appears to be an inescapable correlation. I mean anime is targeted to girls?
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 17:43:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323682221308469249
Boost of @BHaze
MASCULINE GSRRM VS FEMININE GSRRM
By: –@curtd
The Stupid Male Trick – Male GSRRM – I don’t understand, you’re wrong.
The Stupid Female Trick – Female GSRRM – I disapprove, you’re bad.
The male method: Cast an accusation and cause the author to defend himself, rather than allow the falsehood to spread.
The female method is to substitute disapproval for truth. The masculine method is to force the author to educate the critic on his terms rather than do the work, or rather than admit his ignorance or status simply asking the question.
Either you can ask a question if you have little knowledge, you can make a criticism on the terms implied if you have more, or you can explain what you disagree with and ask why you err.
If I criticize thinkers it’s after understanding their work. In most cases thinkers have only one or two fundamental insights that all their additional prose explains the application of it to a host of contexts.
Most critics on the other hand have no ideas, only a field of ignorance error bias, and deceit.
This is the difference between producers and rent seekers.
Some of us produce ideas.
The rest consume, or rent seek.
Male posers are rent seekers.
I have no critics that I know of that are not mere rent-seekers.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 17:42:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105148580342440891
Only about 1/3 of men even exist in women’s mental world. Men are not even objects. They are potential resources or they’re threats. Women choose the best men they can get while still puppeteering. And are more driven by keeping those men from others than having them themselves.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 16:58:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323670792593428483
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323670791083511813
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Women are attracted to their value of men, but more so to the power of women – power that they can follow, imitate, and master. Women are emotional and psychological puppeteers on one end and social superpredators on the other. Men are just resources as women are just objects.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1323670791083511813
Women are attracted to their value of men, but more so to the power of women – power that they can follow, imitate, and master. Women are emotional and psychological puppeteers on one end and social superpredators on the other. Men are just resources as women are just objects.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 16:58:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323670791083511813
There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1323655256828485632
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 15:58:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323655717702770688
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1323655256828485632