Theme: Sex Differences

  • FWIW: That’s a common logical fallacy, and variation of the NAXALT fallacy. The

    FWIW: That’s a common logical fallacy, and variation of the NAXALT fallacy. The fact that all groups consist of distributions of any given property, does not mean we cannot observe consistencies and predict the behavior of individuals and groups, probabilistically given that…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 14:48:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629131046913556481

    Reply addressees: @fawkesmk @LifeHacks4free @bold_justice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629126689409073155

  • No link to a study on that number. Not sure how that can be the case unless a lo

    No link to a study on that number. Not sure how that can be the case unless a lot of women are claiming relationships they don’t have, or treating getting dates as not being single. So I can’t comment on it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 06:37:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629007466850574342

    Reply addressees: @chris_h452

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629006096676405249

  • Women and girls and infantilized boys ‘feel’. Adult males observe, problem-solve

    Women and girls and infantilized boys ‘feel’. Adult males observe, problem-solve, plan, organize, and act. It’s rational, not emotional. It’s practical, not ideological.
    If you need emotion and rage and ideology or religion that means you’re too weak and incompetent to govern.
    So there is nothing logical in what you’re saying.
    You’re just reaching (pathetically) to justify your presumption, instead of asking questions.
    It’s easy do identify intellectually honest, moral, and intelligent people because they’re all the same: they ask questions and seek to understand.
    I’ve already stated that I don’t believe you are intellectually honest so I won’t invest in you.
    And I didn’t block you yet.
    But if you persist I will.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 02:52:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628951037619982336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628949887743143937

  • Just as a thought experiment, what does a ‘good enough woman’ mean for you, vs o

    Just as a thought experiment, what does a ‘good enough woman’ mean for you, vs other men, vs other men who are highly desirable, vs women who think they’re desirable?

    Market’s broken. Markets fail. This one’s failing. WIll it recover? I think I’ve explained the possibilities.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 02:10:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628940442090840064

    Reply addressees: @Frontier_Yankee

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628939970680422402

  • Well, no use complaining about the problem. Either adapt to it, ignore it, or go

    Well, no use complaining about the problem. Either adapt to it, ignore it, or go elsewhere instead. The dating and mating market is crashing, and crashing hardest in the cities. Not my problem. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 02:09:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628940027873959939

    Reply addressees: @shermanklumpp

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628938934230085633

  • I pity the poor men… lol πŸ˜‰ ( IMO: Harder for women. Dating is easy for men if

    I pity the poor men… lol πŸ˜‰

    ( IMO: Harder for women. Dating is easy for men if they just let the woman choose. Trying too hard, without letting her ‘get there’ on her own is counter-productive. )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 01:38:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628932286203691009

    Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628931054198308865

  • DATING It’s not complicated: “Hi. You free this week? Sure, (thinking..) Thursda

    DATING
    It’s not complicated:

    “Hi. You free this week?
    Sure, (thinking..) Thursday or Friday evening.
    Let’s do Thursday. Just in case, anything (food) you prefer to avoid?
    Nothing too spicy, or pasta.
    Me. Great. How about I pick you up at 7:00pm? Dress smart casual.
    Ok. See you Thursday.”

    Pick a place. Make reservations
    Clean the car.
    Text or call the morning of.
    Lay out what you’re going to wear.
    Make a mental or email list of topics to talk about.
    (go about your day)
    Show up on time.
    (Extra Points: Give her a chocolate for the drive)
    Give her(him) your full attention the entire time.

    Any ‘present year’ games that plague the peasantry, then finish, skip, desert, pay, leave, thank him/her. And be off.

    Otherwise, keep chatting until the conversation lags, someone is tired, or body language says ‘leave’. Don’t overdo it.

    Don’t rush contact or affection. Eagerness is pathetic. For my part, I wait until the woman invades my space. That’s the only sign I know she’s interested. I’m not intuitive enough otherwise.

    IMO try to make it work into a permanent relationship with every person you date. If you aren’t trying when you should be trying you won’t know and will ruin it. If it’s not working, it’s fine. You should know if it’s too much work or not within three weeks.

    I dunno. I know on the first date. Hard to know why you don’t know the first date. But then I only punch at my weight so to speak, and in my class so to speak. I consider myself average. I sell that I’m cultured, intelligent, confident and successful. But I’m not a ‘catch’. And I suspect that’s the primary problem today -“Illusions.” A byproduct of everyone gets a prize has finally reached into the dating market.

    The other thing is that the country has declined from middle class to lower middle class to upper proletarian norms, traditions, values, and expectations. So no one is trying to imitate upper-middle, and middle-class norms manners and ethics. So you ‘get what you do yourself’. The ‘we can relax’ habit has degenerated into upper proletarian public behavior and it’s manifesting in the dating and marriage market.

    The dating market has crashed. Let’s see if it corrects and how long it takes – or if it does at all.
    πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 01:26:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628929407875260418

  • MOST PSYCHOLOGISTS ARE TERRIBLE – BUT: For my money a few of the ‘relationship c

    MOST PSYCHOLOGISTS ARE TERRIBLE – BUT:
    For my money a few of the ‘relationship craftspeople’ are far better than most couple’s therapists. (Sarah Dawn Moore esp).

    I’ve started listening to some credential psychologists on YT who are trying to help people with dating and relationships recently. And there is something maybe good, and something a bit off and maybe bad, and I can’t quite disambiguate what that is. I think it’s the analogies they use when I’d expect ordinary incentives. That might be because education level (or intelligence) determines the frame in which you can be influenced by a psychologist’s means of suggestion. So maybe some of these people are used to talking to children and they’re just doing a terrible job talking to adults

    CAUSALITY IS OBVIOUS
    The economics of relationships are now asymmetric for the first time since the beginning of the agrarian expansion and the necessity of territory and assets for inheritance: women can play the androgynous role of social female, mother, economic worker, political taxpayer, which suppresses her femininity, but femininity is the only ‘good’ women provide men with.

    Second, with the burden of taxation, education, and 30 year mortages, a two-parent family isn’t sufficiently advantageous for either party – unless one doesn’t HAVE to work, but works for the social satisfaction and security.

    So really, other than sex there is too little value (utility) in marriage for too many people. As such, we should expect to see a return to marriage, serial monogamy, and no-monogamy that roughly reflects class structure. And we do.

    And we should expect to see fertile attractive women sharing a small number of sexual relations increasingly as we decline in class. And we should expect marital rotation, and infrequent marital stability – which we do and will.

    So, the question is, how do we produce a happy healthy population in the absence of majority nuclear-to-traditional families, without the social economic and political consequences that occur every other time this has happened? (Collapse).

    My expectation is that the current sexual ‘market crash’ will somewhat correct , and more so as the end of the american world trade system ends over the next decade or two. But that the lower classes, maybe even much of the middle class, are lost.

    And this will exacerbate the sex, culture, and race warfare that’s been escalating since the industrial revolution began.

    I don’t counsel relationships any longer. But I when I did, I simply worked on ‘what is the truth that you aren’t telling one another’. If the truth is unbearable, then the relationship can’t stand. Most of the time, the truth does solve the problem one way or another.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 23:31:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628900433031725060

  • (humor) –“Telling an angry woman to calm down works as well as baptising a cat.

    (humor)
    –“Telling an angry woman to calm down works as well as baptising a cat.”–

    BTW: Some women are really cute when they’re angry, and the cute-angry dichotomy is just, well, funny. But I can tell you from experience that grinning, then smiling, then laughing, especially if you’re doubling over, desperately trying to hide it – well, it doesn’t help matters much.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 19:59:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628846917504446472

  • SEX DIFFERENCES IN WORK AND RISK OVER TIME – Six hour work day appears, by all t

    SEX DIFFERENCES IN WORK AND RISK OVER TIME
    – Six hour work day appears, by all the data, to be the max for humans. Women can and do work more house than men, especially including childcare activities, but men work more a activities at the margin where they accumulate cellular damage, shorten their life spans, are at greater risk of maiming or crippling, and higher risk of death.
    – Agrarians die from violence and war at about 20%, hunter gatherers at about 12%, and moderns even in the world wars, at only 1%. And while the percentages are hard to calculate, this sequence is approximates the same for women dying in childbirth.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 19:20:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628837331741319175