Theme: Sex Differences

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) (Continued ….) 9) Here i

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    (Continued ….)

    9) Here is what will ruin your day (‘because it ruined mine). Men achieve status through the accumulation of responsibility (capitalization). Women achieve status by evasion of responsibility (hyperconsumption). Just as there is no human behavior that cannot be reduced to the pursuit of acquisition, retention, or consumption, there is no sex difference in behavior that cannot be reduced to the search for irresponsibility and consumption IN time vs responsibility and capitalization OVER time. Likewise, women are devoted IN time, but men are loyal OVER time. In this sense, this is why relationships are returning to pre-agrarian serial monogamy with frequent ‘cheating’. So in abstract terms “women are eschewing political responsibility for personal hyperconsumption.” This is burning down civilizational capital in a genetic and cultural bonfire. But what are we to do? (Sweden,Denmark while we can afford it).
    10) Civilization depends on very complex accumulated ‘technologies’ of cooperation that provide us with Pareto hierarchies and nash distributions. We have just thrown a wrench in evolution. And while we’re taking the decline in population worldwide as a good thing given the energy cost per capita of industrial-age mankind, the fact is that our entire way of life is going to collapse if we do not find a way to adapt to this ‘wrench in the works’: the breakdown of intersexual markets, due to the breakdown of intersexual value.

    Great chat.
    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:47:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414397465063424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUy6CU_tLLQ

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) NOTES: 1) Adulthood: Most

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUy6CU_tLLQ

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:46:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) NOTES: 1) Adulthood: Most

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://t.co/vWZqVceKX7

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress our protective instincts. We’re also far, far, more situationally aware and rapidly reacting in the protection of children. I’ve tried to find research on why women freeze before acting.
    3) Intersexual Relations: women have only one value to men, and that’s femininity. The masculinization of women on one hand and the export of jobs requiring male physical strength or mechanical intuition on the other have collapsed the mating market from both sides.
    4) Roles: The collapse of reproduction isn’t sustainable. What is happening to Japan, and shortly to China and Russia, is going to happen here. Our way of life is dependent upon ‘growth’ and intergenerational redistribution. That’s GOING to end. Soon. Artificial wombs? Might be a necessity. πŸ˜‰
    5) “Childlike”: Males desire fertility. Youthful fertility has a higher success rate. Neoteny expresses fertility. The entire history of human evolution is driven by the preference for neoteny. And domestication emerged from neoteny. Don’t want masculine men that women universally go for if you don’t also accept that men want young fertility. I mean…. evolution has reasons so to speak. (Yes the Japanese perversion thing is really,r really, really creepy. I understand the biology of it but it’s still creepy.
    6) “Competency”: Yes competency has to do with genitalia because sex differences in INTEREST manifest in the sexual distribution of competency. There is also a fairly large difference in male and female capacity for verbal empathic vs physical spacial differences. This is even evident in how men and women do math. (pictures vs models).
    7) “Coddling” Men and women both coddle women. Why? Men aren’t sure why we do it. Same where women object to mansplaining, but men pretty much ignore woman-splaining twenty-four hours a day. (Many men would view this conversation as woman-splaining. And notice how this conversation is about how you feel, rather than the aggregate consequences of the transformation of reproductive production to work, production, taxation, and hyperconsumption in the absence of intergenerational reproduction. Again, Feels(individuals) vs Reals (systems)). We do this because of the sex differences in the division of the labor of TIME. Feminine empathizing IN time, and masculine systematizing OVER time. Once you understand this, it’s easy to say why men ignore women in anything not interpersonal, and women shame men for their frequent ‘stupidity’ in the interpersonal, or explaining how things work when the subject is how one feels about how they work. I mean. I find it pretty humorous in both directions. πŸ˜‰
    8) “Boss ????”: This is female independence and the “strong independent woman” strategy. Men have nothing left to ‘trade’. And femininity is the only value women provide that men don’t provide better. If it feels good do it. But men will adapt accordingly too. Marriage and reproduction will continue to collapse. “Society” means children, because children are a commonality, where self-gratification is a particularism. So we don’t have a ‘society’ without children and families. Nothing we can do about it. CORE ISSUE: the destruction of the intersexual marketplace for reproduction, and the reduction of costs by the two-parent family (or even extended three-generational family is even better.).
    (continued in a reply …)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:46:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229365829632

  • Well, just to be clear, my only concern is ending the race conflict that’s been

    Well, just to be clear, my only concern is ending the race conflict that’s been intentionally created by the cultural and race Marxists, just as my only concern is ending the sex conflict that’s been intentionally created by the sex Marxists (feminists). So my interest, as always, is having an open discussion where we can counter the effect. And if Adams wants to take the lead on it, then I”m good with it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 01:35:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630381242670563328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630380382255448064

  • I don’t know really. Because none of my followers that interact with me, have sa

    I don’t know really. Because none of my followers that interact with me, have said such a thing, or fail to grasp that whenever I say anything about female->feminine->Mixed <-Masculine<- Male that we’re talking about distributions (in other words, we intrinsically understand Distributions vs NAXALTs.).

    So, if “most of my followers” believe such a thing that would be …. odd. They couldn’t then be ‘followers’. They’d have to be pretty much drive-by raiders. πŸ˜‰ Not that it would mean you were wrong. πŸ˜‰

    Why? Because our first principle of intersexual cooperation is the falsehood of the ideal type, and instead the equilibrium between the sexes given our opposing interests and the necessity of exchanges to reach that equilibrium.

    So I think I’ll post a long-running poll to see if they do understand (or not).

    That’d be interesting. (I don’t really know the answer.)

    Thanks for the nudge. πŸ˜‰

    -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 01:07:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630374123842031616

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630366453118509057

  • (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict ) 1) I love women (maybe more than I should lo

    (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict )
    1) I love women (maybe more than I should lol) I certainly managed to accumulate more ex’s than I should. I mean. I’m average.

    2) I was raised with the put women-on-a-pedestal principle. I like that principle just fine, thanks.

    3) As a bit of… https://twitter.com/TheMcGloneCode/status/1630359569028337668

  • (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict ) 1) I love women (maybe more than I should lo

    (Lament: The Current Sex Conflict )
    1) I love women (maybe more than I should lol) I certainly managed to accumulate more ex’s than I should. I mean. I’m average.

    2) I was raised with the put women-on-a-pedestal principle. I like that principle just fine, thanks.

    3) As a bit of an aspie, women have extraordinary value in explaining people and their behavior when I’m confused (ignorant). πŸ˜‰

    4) I have had female friends for years, and valued them. But then I’m ‘allergic’ to women friends who might have an interest (I find it creepy because I perceive it as manipulation even if it’s genuine interest). But in truth I’m kind of oblivious. πŸ˜‰

    5) Unless the woman was an employee, I probably wouldn’t spend time with her without my wife. If she is an employee then I have no problem at all, as long as it’s in public. (My assistants, that’s a different thing. It’s unavoidable. Executive Assistants are ‘work wives’ and I use them to manage me, and who has access to me. But married assistants with children I’ve found are pretty safe.)

    THE SAD BIT
    So my problem here is that I like women, being married to women, working with women, and having women friends, and being friends with wives of my friends. And this whole war-of-the sexes for destructive ideological purposes is just, well SAD. πŸ™


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 00:22:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630362842305110017

  • SCOTT ADAMS AND OTHERS: DON’T TALK TO WOMEN? πŸ˜‰ Their Position: The only rationa

    SCOTT ADAMS AND OTHERS: DON’T TALK TO WOMEN? πŸ˜‰
    Their Position: The only rational choice for men, is to avoid being alone with any women, and minimize conversations with women, by limiting them to absolutely necessary task-based contexts, and leaving immediately when done.
    Why: Women have been radicalized to find ‘me too’ anywhere and everywhere.

    As a CEO, I prefer to meet with women in the open, or if privacy is required, in a restaurant, where there are a lot of people, or with my office door open, and for certain with the blinds open. And while it’s my practice to invite staff over for coffee and scones or something of that nature, invite women only in groups.
    It helps that I adopt ‘flat affect’ easily, I’m sort of ‘numb’ to female manipulation, and react aggressively to ‘feminine games’. But it didn’t stop rumors that weren’t true anyway. Precisely because my assistants were attractive.
    Furthermore, after I was divorced, a number of women pursued me, and at least one of them was dishonest in doing so. So, I could be me-too’ed as well.
    So the workplace is off the mating menu. Dating Sites are off the mating menu. And what space isn’t off the mating menu, that isn’t saturated by people in the hookup rather than relationship game?
    I dunno. I just wouldn’t want to be on the market today. And I’d be really, really, really careful hiring women who had any access to me, who weren’t married with children and conservative.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 22:06:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630328425083707392

  • Left=Feminine Christianity = Feminine

    Left=Feminine
    Christianity = Feminine.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 17:03:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629889842686357512

    Reply addressees: @GPEditor @Thaeus4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629879812755005441

  • THE ANTI-FEMINIST TAKE? –“Were you oppressed? Or were the vast majority of wome

    THE ANTI-FEMINIST TAKE?
    –“Were you oppressed? Or were the vast majority of women irrational, impulsive, emotional, selfish, greedy, hyper-consuming, attention-seeking, virtue signaling, seditious, treasonous, socially poisonous whores, unfit to raise the children (boys) necessary to create the discipline, selflessness, capitalization, and commons necessary for society, culture, and civilization? I mean, look at western women today. They’re the freest to express themselves in civilizational history, and demonstrate every day that women are, after all, Pandoras – the origin of all the world’s evils?”–

    See? We can take the extreme position too.

    Men and women domesticated each other into the Pareto and Nash optimums for both, which produced the best for the most – and there is no alternative unless we develop artificial wombs. And in that case, it turns out, that men are better parents than women, and women are often better workers – at least where strength isn’t involved. So why not have men gravitate to capitalizing by raising families, societies, and polities and women work for their consumption? I mean. That turns into a cycle of history, doesn’t it? Returning us to our original form?

    The point is that you can’t hyper-consume without hyper-capitalizing, which together cancel one another out, ending hyper-everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 00:21:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629637832825241600