Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Explanation: Frontal Lobe: precise physical manipulation vs Occipital Lobe: prec

    Explanation:
    Frontal Lobe: precise physical manipulation vs Occipital Lobe: precise visual disambiguation. What sex differences in observe behavior do these sex differences in brain organization illustrate and why would evolution have done so?
    Combine with the primary sex difference: organization of the brain for predicting emotions in time, vs organization of the brain for predicting systems over time, and what do the two neural concentrations of the frontal and occipital provide?
    Once you know the necessity of hemispheric priority in repsonse to bilateralism, the hemispheric specialization (bias really) as a division of labor that results, the organization of the brain laterally for or longitudinally for breadth, and the hierarchical and recursive structure of the brain from back to front, then undestanding human differences is increasingly simple. Everything else is genetic load, developmental defect, the degree of neotenic evolution in the group, and cultural and the random neural development resulting from idiosyncratic experience biased by all of the above.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:28:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652666198167810050

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651925368561885186

  • Explanation: Frontal Lobe: precise physical manipulation vs Occipital Lobe: prec

    Explanation:
    Frontal Lobe: precise physical manipulation vs Occipital Lobe: precise visual disambiguation. What sex differences in observe behavior do these sex differences in brain organization illustrate and why would evolution have done so?
    Combine with the primary sex difference: organization of the brain for predicting emotions in time, vs organization of the brain for predicting systems over time, and what do the two neural concentrations of the frontal and occipital provide?
    Once you know the necessity of hemispheric priority in repsonse to bilateralism, the hemispheric specialization (bias really) as a division of labor that results, the organization of the brain laterally for or longitudinally for breadth, and the hierarchical and recursive structure of the brain from back to front, then undestanding human differences is increasingly simple. Everything else is genetic load, developmental defect, the degree of neotenic evolution in the group, and cultural and the random neural development resulting from idiosyncratic experience biased by all of the above.

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:28:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652666198012706818

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651925368561885186

  • This is a correct and useful observation, that masculine (systemic, objective) t

    This is a correct and useful observation, that masculine (systemic, objective) thinking tends toward over maximization of efficiency at the expense of experiential preference. (which frustrates women of all cultures no end.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 13:13:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652662511366283264

    Reply addressees: @ScienceMonthly

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652656138431926273

  • It’s not a complex function. Instead it’s a trivially simple one. The combinatio

    It’s not a complex function. Instead it’s a trivially simple one. The combination of iq, neoteny, genetic load, sex, personality, class, and culture make it APPEAR complex when it isn’t. Why? Justification.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 10:45:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652625093007138816

    Reply addressees: @mekhetgbfg @PaoloShirasi @kareem_carr

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652600919719067649

  • RT @DegenRolf: Men had more nerve cells than women in the ‘occipital’ lobe at th

    RT @DegenRolf: Men had more nerve cells than women in the ‘occipital’ lobe at the back of the head, while neurons were more densely packed…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 04:24:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652529255669022720

  • RT @NoahRevoy: Estrogen is a hallucinogen

    RT @NoahRevoy: Estrogen is a hallucinogen.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 03:50:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652520839739322368

  • RT @WalterIII: WHY PSYCHOLOGY PUSHES MEDITATION “Masculine: physical(outcomes) –

    RT @WalterIII: WHY PSYCHOLOGY PUSHES MEDITATION
    “Masculine: physical(outcomes)
    -versus-
    Feminine: emotional(experiential)”
    Did you ever…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-29 23:23:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652453480190169088

  • RT @mythPloughman: @AporiaMagazine Human sexuality is a lot more malleable than

    RT @mythPloughman: @AporiaMagazine Human sexuality is a lot more malleable than a lot of people like to think. The traditional approach is…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-29 12:55:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652295563327467523

  • (core) (sex differences) Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉 P-Law r

    (core) (sex differences)
    Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉

    P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.

    But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.

    Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.

    So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.

    So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:

    Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).

    -versus-

    Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).

    Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.

    Fast Focused Predator over time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651949376602767362

  • (core) (sex differences) Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉 P-Law r

    (core) (sex differences)
    Corrective Measures Needed for ‘undergrads’. 😉

    P-Law requires we cognitively switch to the use of series (measures) rather than sets (ideals). So you can’t reduce everything to single test as (archaic) philosophical “set-morons” do. Mathiness, Verbalism, Ideals, and Sets are what prevented and still resist evolution into computation, operations, original measures, and ordinal tests.

    But because you’ve been indoctrinated by religion, philosophy, and moral reasoning into ‘doing it wrong’ – simply because doing it wrong is simpler and requires less knowledge, it’s harder for you to learn how to ‘do it right’.

    Everything we do: disambiguation into a system of measurement, by enumeration serialization and operationalization, producing ordinal measures, from which we produce tests by a series of ordinal measures.

    So, Instead, we test the entire spectrum of sex differences in cognition just as we test the entire spectrum of testimony, reciprocity, and demonstrated interests, and the hierarchy of ternary logic at physical scale to trifunctional behaviors at macro scale.

    So just as we have checklists for testimony(truth), reciprocity(morality), and demonstrated interests (facts), we have checklists for male and female differences – but the list is quite large, and this is only the first order of that list:

    Masculine: Supply: predator, systematizing, over time, physical(outcomes), empirical thinking, political, loyal, harming, productive status via accumulation of responsibility for capital (capitalizing).

    -versus-

    Feminine: Demand: prey, empathizing, in time, emotional(experiential), magical thinking, social, devoted, undermining, parasitic, status via accumulating irresponsibiilty for capital (hyperconsumption).

    Whenever you’re making a comparison between ‘left (feminine) and right (masculine) cognitive and moral biases, then you must run the entire list, lest you misapply causality.

    Fast Focused Predator over time vs Reactive General Prey in time is just the beginning of the sex differences in brain organization that we too often reduce to ‘reals vs feels’.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-28 13:59:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1651949376405753860