Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • FORMULA? “Responsibility in Relation to Resources” Women seek access to more res

    FORMULA?
    “Responsibility in Relation to Resources”

    Women seek access to more resources without accumulating responsibiilty for them – but only to access them for use and consumption of them.

    They accumulate irresponsibility in relation to resources, the way men accumulate responsibility in relation to resources.

    This is the basic female algorithm because they are weaker prey animals with costly fragile dependent children who require males to compensate for weakness, prey condition, cost, fragility and dependence of themsevles and their offspring.

    Everything is in equilibrium under ternary logic of the universe, and we need only balance the equation via construction from first principles to understand any given observable behavior.

    Cheers
    Curt

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @neoCamelist @WalterIII

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 13:24:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654114872626495488

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654113335871262720

  • RT @WalterIII: WHY THE FEMININE BIAS IS HYPERCONSUMPTIVE When @curtdoolittle say

    RT @WalterIII: WHY THE FEMININE BIAS IS HYPERCONSUMPTIVE

    When @curtdoolittle says that the feminine is “accumulating irresponsibility”, wh…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-04 01:11:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653930429559209985

  • RT @kerry62189: @curtdoolittle @TheAutistocrat @WalterIII @Turbo_Flux @StevePend

    RT @kerry62189: @curtdoolittle @TheAutistocrat @WalterIII @Turbo_Flux @StevePender IMO, much of what you refer to as female irresponsibilit…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 04:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653262879754158080

  • We separate pilpul from sophistry because of the differences between the applica

    We separate pilpul from sophistry because of the differences between the application (and I’ve listed some of them already). But again, you’ve just demonstrated feminine GSRRM, proving my point.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 23:24:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653178568560574470

    Reply addressees: @Hamishtadel1 @AmKsheOref @Vessel_of_Glass

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653166763759005696

  • So do you have opinions on the ‘separate spheres’ vs ‘identical spheres’ questio

    So do you have opinions on the ‘separate spheres’ vs ‘identical spheres’ question? I doubt that we can return to the past. But if current dating, marriage, reproduction, family and divorce continues playing out, the ‘market’ is going to correct one way or another. But how will it…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 23:23:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653178278465634307

    Reply addressees: @kerry62189 @TheAutistocrat @WalterIII @Turbo_Flux @StevePender

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653174613252222977

  • GOING THROUGH YOUR OPPOSITE’S PHONE? I follow Heinlein’s advice that women need

    GOING THROUGH YOUR OPPOSITE’S PHONE?
    I follow Heinlein’s advice that women need private spaces for their little fears, emotions, loves, copes and insanities, so I don’t want to intrude on her phone, purse, computer, or desk without invitation. But I am happy for any woman I’m in a relationship with (really, any woman at all) to go through my phone. Other than a rather eccentric sense of humor and proper new england man-to-man trash talking, I don’t say anything I wouldn’t want printed in the newspaper. That said, I DO keep a set of directories of photos for every woman I’ve ever been in a relationship with – because I love all of them (at least in memory) and it makes me happy to review them now and then. And I would expect a woman to respect my love of those memories like I would respect hers. I’ve told each woman I do this, and for some reason they think it’s fine. They just don’t want to look thru them themselves. 😉 I can think of a few exceptions when I’ve talked to an ex about a problem of hers or mine that I’d prefer were kept private, but I generally would communicate what I’d done and said, so that my mate wouldn’t have reason to doubt.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 22:14:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653161060872880131

  • GOING THROUGH YOUR OPPOSITE’S PHONE? I follow Heinlein’s advice that women need

    GOING THROUGH YOUR OPPOSITE’S PHONE?
    I follow Heinlein’s advice that women need private spaces for their little fears, emotions, loves, copes and insanities, so I don’t want to intrude on her phone, purse, computer, or desk without invitation. But I am happy for any woman I’m in a relationship with (really, any woman at all) to go through my phone. Other than a rather eccentric sense of humor and proper new england man-to-man trash talking, I don’t say anything I wouldn’t want printed in the newspaper. That said, I DO keep a set of directories of photos for every woman I’ve ever been in a relationship with – because I love all of them (at least in memory) and it makes me happy to review them now and then. And I would expect a woman to respect my love of those memories like I would respect hers. I’ve told each woman I do this, and for some reason they think it’s fine. They just don’t want to look thru them themselves. 😉 I can think of a few exceptions when I’ve talked to an ex about a problem of hers or mine that I’d prefer were kept private, but I generally would communicate what I’d done and said, so that my mate wouldn’t have reason to doubt.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 22:14:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653161060982042625

  • Missing the piont aren’t you? The pattern of pseudoscience by applying the femal

    Missing the piont aren’t you?

    The pattern of pseudoscience by applying the female cognitive bias and the feminine group strategy of the culture and the metaphysical presumptions values and methods of argument persuasion and logic within them.

    Gould undermined a generation of anthropology we are still trying to correct.

    You care about blame.

    I care about changing destructive and devolutionary behavior.

    To fix that behavior requires equally suppressing the feminine means of anti-social behavior just as thorougnly as we have the male.

    The reason I refer to the jewish group strategy and demonstration of feminine cognition in their pseudosciences and warfare from within intentional ‘march thu the institutions of cultural production’, is to demonstrate that it’s the feminine cognitive bias that’s the problem, and that western law did not update it’s legislation code and law to equally suppress the female method of warfare from within, enabled by the pairing of the introduction of women and postwar jews into the polity combined with the anti-darwinian revolution against the eugenics movement, which was as important as the industrial and scientific revolutions.

    I do what’s true. I don’t care about blame. Particularly about blame for what people are culturally or genetically biased to do. I care about prohibiting the criminality regardless of wehther it is intentional (marxists) or not (women, and the abrahamic religions.)

    Reply addressees: @Slezkinite @JFGariepy

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 20:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653131682701090819

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653129038599168001

  • Missing the piont aren’t you? The pattern of pseudoscience by applying the femal

    Missing the piont aren’t you?

    The pattern of pseudoscience by applying the female cognitive bias and the feminine group strategy of the culture and the metaphysical presumptions values and methods of argument persuasion and logic within them.

    Gould undermined a generation of anthropology we are still trying to correct.

    You care about blame.

    I care about changing destructive and devolutionary behavior.

    To fix that behavior requires equally suppressing the feminine means of anti-social behavior just as thorougnly as we have the male.

    The reason I refer to the jewish group strategy and demonstration of feminine cognition in their pseudosciences and warfare from within intentional ‘march thu the institutions of cultural production’, is to demonstrate that it’s the feminine cognitive bias that’s the problem, and that western law did not update it’s legislation code and law to equally suppress the female method of warfare from within, enabled by the pairing of the introduction of women and postwar jews into the polity combined with the anti-darwinian revolution against the eugenics movement, which was as important as the industrial and scientific revolutions.

    I do what’s true. I don’t care about blame. Particularly about blame for what people are culturally or genetically biased to do. I care about prohibiting the criminality regardless of wehther it is intentional (marxists) or not (women, and the abrahamic religions.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 20:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653131682810044426

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653129038599168001

  • RT @JayMan471: It’s not IQ, generally. Compare male comedians with female comedi

    RT @JayMan471: It’s not IQ, generally. Compare male comedians with female comedians. Women are about people and relationships. Things and b…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:54:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653095623770484737