Theme: Sex Differences

  • “MEN SHOULD BE PROTECTING WOMEN – BUT FOR SOME REASON THEY”VE GIVEN UP” Women ar

    “MEN SHOULD BE PROTECTING WOMEN – BUT FOR SOME REASON THEY”VE GIVEN UP”

    Women are irrational actors, live in imaginary and often magical world, but men are rational actors. We live in the real world, and the world we struggle to make real by our efforts.

    You tell men you hate them 24 hours a day, in every single way possible, and you wonder why entire generations are giving up on you en masse? You (collectively), are out of control, hyper-privileged, hyperconsumtive, irresponsible, selfish, neurotic, magical thinking, attention addicts with only about one percent of women tolerable enough for marriage and long term trust and investment, in a legal political and court system that is entirely for the benefit of women, and entirely at the expense of men, despite that women spend seventy percent of the money, incurr most of the debt, do so for selfish reasons, and consume seventy percdent of government services.

    So what is it precisely that the anti-enfranchisement men and women had wrong about women in commerc and government?

    It took a while. But it turns out – they had nothing wrong. And that surprised even those of us who were optimists.

    So now that you’ve destroyed dating, mating, relationships, the family, replacement reproduction, the education system, the legal system, and the government, and you’ve driven us to the bring of civil war between irresponsible urban and responsible rural, what do you think is going to happen? It’s happening. And if you are under 25 today there aren’t going to be children to pay for your health care, your social security, or to producde enough workers with enough global competitive advantage to ensure that you are other than living your life on the edge of poverty even more so than people are now.

    Youi’ve destroyed the very concept that democdracy is possible. And you’ve reversed the two thousand years we’ve spent, particularly the chivalric and victorian efforts to reframe women as virtous in stead of selfish trivial shallow vain harlots underminers gossips and shrills. Which is precisely why women were contained to the home and second class citizens or les until the industrial revolution gave teh promise of freedom to participate with equal responsibility to the private and common.

    Only to realize that the primary difference between the sexes is male proucition of and responsibilty for common comons and female selfish hyperconsumption and irresponsibility for commons. That’s what feels vs reals means.

    I”m out of the game at my age, but what’s occurring is obvoius cause and consequencde. All life equilibrates to satisfy the needs of sexes and ages and abilities, and the family was the first institution that produced a compromise exchange between the sexes, the ages, and the abilities.

    Women killed the family. Worse. THat was the INTENTION of the feminist movement. To destroy the family. Just as the leftist movement’s ambition is to destroy the family, the classes, the nobility and aristocracy, and reduce us all to children and peasantry.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @schizarella


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 20:13:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706039166843158528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705702085931786440

  • I mean, I dunno why advertizing your sexuality and sexual availability specifica

    I mean, I dunno why advertizing your sexuality and sexual availability specifically so that you can attract attention, and attracts attention you do not want, should surprise you.

    Most women, at least those not from the lower classes (which is where these girls are usually from – otherwise no father would let his daughter out in public looking like that without educating her, that you dress to attract the attention you want, minus the attention you don’t want.

    You want to bet she’s the daughter of a single mother? Or is she even h as a father, he’s so harassed by his obsesively neurotic wife he just doesn’t say anything because it’s not worth the conflict. And he can’t divorce her becuase she’ll economically destroy him.

    Childish taste from childish behavior produces childish results.

    Reply addressees: @schizarella


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 19:58:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706035394305736704

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705575818196603360

  • “the higher the verbal GRE score, the more a field’s professors favored Democrat

    –“the higher the verbal GRE score, the more a field’s professors favored Democrats. The higher the quantitative GRE score, the more it favored Republicans.”–

    Like I said. Sex differences in cognition, morals, metaphysics are consistent.

    There is no ‘we’ problem.
    There is just a ‘her’ problem.
    And the ‘her’problem is largely a childless and single mother problem.

    And the psychological dysfunction is pouring out of single mother households like a plague.

    It took quite a while to collect the data on our experiment with opening employment and voting to women, and it’s far worse than our ancestors predicted.

    And don’t come at me about it. I am on the other side of this in wants, but I can’t deny the evidence.

    Either women need their own house of government, or we need to require men military servicde and women three children to vote, or we are going to have to end women voting altogether, or we are going to have to give up on democracy altogether.

    Now, I”m not up for giving up on democracy – though giving up on representative government appears necessary, and turning to either economic or direct democdracy, again by house(competency, merit) is clearly necessary.

    And, to ensure a future, removing the women from education, at least for boys and men, and instituting vast education reform, including what we call the natural law as the foundation of ethics and morality, so that morality is again a science.

    I don’t like any of this but the data is the data and it’s painfully obviuos that women are easily manipulateed, easily falll prey to magical thinking, and without resposibilty for their own children poison social, economic, and political life to the point where they are far more destructive internally than any enemy has been externally. And yes we know who sells them this nonsense but htat’s fixable too.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 23:44:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705729814643044352

  • I see a bunch of contemporary men humoring a bunch of contemporary women, who ar

    I see a bunch of contemporary men humoring a bunch of contemporary women, who are all too fascinated by gossip and clearly do not possess the skills nor the personality required to employ those skills, that they claim to have.

    Why? Look. Do you know what really capable disciplined intelligent nerds are like when under military discipline?

    Not much drama. None at all actually.

    During my lifetime tolerance for drama in commerce, industry, finance, law, government, and the military has roared to life – primarily because of the introduction of women, who cannot seem to breath without external emotional stimulation, and worse, when stressed or bored, create it to feel present.

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 21:56:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705702818085027840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705582036025491647

  • I haven’t looked into this but given the sex differences in political bias and t

    I haven’t looked into this but given the sex differences in political bias and the sex difference in the distribution between psychosis and autism there is a chance that you’re correct. I think the scarier question is why are so many women so consistently mentally ill, yet their antisocial behavior tolerated, while male antisocial behavior is simple and dangerous but lower than female mental illness.

    Reply addressees: @monitoringbias


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 21:46:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705700312294490112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705620730841379080

  • IS FEMALE MANIPULATION A CLASS THING? (Mostly) Hmm…. It’s very hard to be a man

    IS FEMALE MANIPULATION A CLASS THING? (Mostly)

    Hmm…. It’s very hard to be a man in the upper half a percent if you are swayed by the manipulations of women. In fact that’s what both sexes appreciate in male executives, is our insensitivity to that nonsense.

    I can tell you that in my career I valued women highly because my aspieness requires their assistance in judging people – and preparing me to meet with them. So I have worshipped the women around me in business my entire career. Because I NEED them.

    That said, I’ve had quite a few ‘feminist’ employees literally hate me because I’m absolutely f——g immune to that nonsense.

    Gimme a mom who says she needs to put family and kids first and if she does her job I’m all in for her, and every extra bit I can help with.

    But, give me one of these self righteous feminists who think they’re not making the upper level because of male oppression and I’m a master at explaining how they are selfish, manipulative and untrustworthy and won’t put loyalty to the rest of the management team ahead of their self interest – which is required for the peerage of shared ownership of a company. So I’ll keep paying them more than anyone else will but I’m not putting the company at risk by having one of them on the management team. (Best woman I’ve ever had in management is a gay women who I love to this very day as one of the best people I”ve ever worked with.)

    Women have a very hard time comprehending absolute loyalty The one’s that do are priceless. And they’re married. And they stay married. I was married to one but cancer changed me so much I had to wipe the slate clean and start over with simplicity and that just wasn’t in her plans. 😉

    So yes, it’s mostly a class thing. I’m having a bit of trouble with the dating issue because it LOOKS like a class thing. But the upper class is notoriously out of sight, and wouldn’t disgrace itself with this kind of nonsense. So until I see some data I just have to reserve judgement.

    It also might be that with the end of my people (anglos) as an elite, and replacement with credentialists, and our displacement by the undermining of women, that there are no true upper class any longer that hasn’t defected to the financial games like the rest.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Obediencio1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 21:01:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705688973853511680

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705680920009740609

  • Exodus 22:18 “You will not allow a sorceress to live.” That’s the wrong translat

    Exodus 22:18 “You will not allow a sorceress to live.”

    That’s the wrong translation: it’s sorcerer – the male.
    The sorcerers organize the misbehavior of he women because they are easily manipulated, and sorcerers use spells (language) to organize them.

    Now I need to find out…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 17:08:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705630303291593076

  • UNDERSTANDING JEWISH CIV AS UNDERSTANDING OUR WOMEN. Ok. Without apologizing for

    UNDERSTANDING JEWISH CIV AS UNDERSTANDING OUR WOMEN.
    Ok. Without apologizing for their crimes:
    What is the difference between jewish behavior that offends us and the behavior of our women?
    There isn’t any.
    Once you see that you understand: … Are our women conscious of what they do? Don’t they think they’re doing good when they’re being destructive instead? So then who is responsible? The woman and her instictincts or the man and his? The child or the adult?
    We’re the adults.
    We have to behave like adults.
    We are the sex that produces and defends capital.
    They are the sex that consumes and hyperconsumes.
    And we have to prohibit antisocial anti-economic, anti-political behavior that the feminine mind uses to maximize consumption while avoiding responsibility for the capitalization and defesnse of the commons.
    It is entirely unnatural for mankind to behave under ‘whiteness’ which is the maximization of individual responsibilty for the private and common, at psychological, emotional, and phyisical cost, and often at personal risk
    That is what we do in whiteness. And it is why everyone rebells against it – because its very expensive. And that expensive existence is why we have more and they have less, and they want what we have without paying those hefty costs of behavior, self regulation, and sacrifice.

    We are more neoetenous while we are also quite large and strong. The asians are more neotenous but not large and strong. The rest are not neotenous. They have less self regulation.

    Thats why we and asians do fine, and the rest of the world struggles. We can regulate better than they can so we can pay behavioral costs that are very high for them.

    Women likewise have very high costs of self regulation. And they need external (social, ‘feelz’) regulation, even though our men can internally regulate.

    Science is helpful. We have to listen to it rather than this nonsense that we are all equal. We are not. We are not even very close to equal.

    Try to work on solutions rather than blame and punishment. I know that given the damage they’ve done that it’s hard to do so.
    But once integrated and their habitual behavior regulated, we should be fine together.

    Reply addressees: @SwornInvictus @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 01:21:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705391842899152898

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705387990045044922

  • Harris has female intuitions combined with male systematizing which is fairly in

    Harris has female intuitions combined with male systematizing which is fairly interesting to watch if you’re conscious of the sex differences in cognition.

    I listen to some of his utterances thinking “Europeans don’t do that”. Because men don’t do that. Only women do.

    It’s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 21:55:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705340009081966755

    Reply addressees: @Zontar_Dow @SpicyCentrist @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705339163988348931

  • The only places that are not seeing the same curve of reproductive collapse are

    The only places that are not seeing the same curve of reproductive collapse are in some parts of sub Saharan Africa. Why? More than replacement reproduction is a function of extreme poverty. Otherwise children are too expensive.

    So in this map we see Pakistan 230M – Afghanistan… https://t.co/2R6MbODEJt


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 21:25:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705332438631587914

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705330307023380667