Theme: Sex Differences

  • So yes, IQ is a measure of (g) which is a synthesis of verbal(feminine bias) vs

    So yes, IQ is a measure of (g) which is a synthesis of verbal(feminine bias) vs spatial(masculine bias) and it’s literally a measure of neural adaptivity. It’s really not much more than the friction or lack of it in neural connectivity.
    The science is a little confusing, but it appears that even in twins it can vary quite a bit. The reason being that neural formation in utero is only probabalistic, and the first two years after birth continue the trend. So even in identical twins you can have quite a bit of variation just because they shared a womb with some variations.

    Reply addressees: @akingoffools


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:47:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707255625112080384

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707253216419950719

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle @schizarella Ironically, feminism didn’t get w

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle @schizarella Ironically, feminism didn’t get women to turn their backs on men, it got women to turn their…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 04:12:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707246833133642011

  • AS US IQ DECLINES: WORTH REGULAR REPOSTING The percent of the population that is

    AS US IQ DECLINES: WORTH REGULAR REPOSTING
    The percent of the population that is all but unemployeable was 16%. It is heading to 25% as immigration increases, reproductive asymmetry remains, and as a result IQ decreases.
    What are we going to do with a modern economy where a quarter of the population is unemployable? What are we going to do with the clerical white collar workers (women) that have expanded since the computer revolution in the 1980s. The laborers were hurt by mechanization, and the white collar workers who shuffle information are going to be hurt by AI. What if we can’t find anything that’s more than subsistence level for more than a quarter, to maybe a third of the population?
    https://t.co/HbRon4CZpY


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 01:49:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707210768922378240

  • (Women can do it if we make it socially acceptable (necessary) for them to do it

    (Women can do it if we make it socially acceptable (necessary) for them to do it. I think. I think. There are already bout 10% who can. It’s got to be possible for more than that.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 01:33:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707206744361836656

    Reply addressees: @FeminaStudiosa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707205412070547952

  • I do true. It’s a man thing apparently. 😉 Data is its white wealthy women who a

    I do true. It’s a man thing apparently. 😉 Data is its white wealthy women who are neurotic causing the woke suppression in academia, and it’s single women and moreso women without children that are skewing the voting left.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 01:08:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707200534036254949

    Reply addressees: @justinmchase @afrointernet @schizarella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707199548857180671

  • Yes. But again. The problem is women. It’s just women. The problem isn’t the wes

    Yes. But again. The problem is women. It’s just women. The problem isn’t the west, or our men, it’s just women. So knowing that, what do we do?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-28 00:39:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707193174077178264

    Reply addressees: @6745i473

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707191383390401002

  • TOP TEN REASONS FOR THE PRESENT CONFLICT CAUSED BY THE UNTRAINED INSTINCTS OF WO

    TOP TEN REASONS FOR THE PRESENT CONFLICT CAUSED BY THE UNTRAINED INSTINCTS OF WOMEN IN A POLITY.

    Ok. You’re a good person.

    But let me help you understand the problem between the sexes manifesting in the breakdown of relationships family, reproduction, economic conditions, mental illness, suicide, loss of American competitiveness, decline in education, and the current escalation in the past sixty years of political conflict started by the postwar left – by the predictability of your response.

    1. All women think they are the exception
    2. All women practice the NAXALT/AXALT fallacy.
    3. All women reverse approval-disapproval with true-false because all women empathize first and then justify their feelings, while at least ten percent of men understand first and then falsify their understanding – with feelings rarely mattering. We think in facts.
    4. All women’s difference in cognition from men is reducible to the female evasion of responsibility for self regulation, other-regulation, and the commons, as that responsibility exposes them to risk of conflict, and that risk would require self regulation rather than continuously defaulting to emotion and experience and empathy.
    5. All women’s claims of oppression are demands from males that women bear responsibility for their display word and deeds at the expense of giving into their emotions – just like men must. So all female claims of oppression are evidence of immaturity (inner child) seeking to evade responsibility for impulse and action.
    6. All women defend against the effort of self regulation, truth before face, and responsibility for self and commons, by social construction of falsehoods and baiting into hazard by undermining, canceling and reputation destruction by the process we call gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, moralizing, undermining, sedition, and treason.
    7. All women are only devote in time but not loyal over time, so women cannot achieve the same successes in science, business, economics and politics as men – because loyalty is necessary to bear the cost and risks of competition together.
    8. All women are hyperconsumptive hypergamic selfish consumers who seek to access the capital produced by responsibility through men that they cannot access themselves, because their intolerance for conflict, risk, truth, and self regulation and accumulation of responsibility.
    9. We are in a period of time where women have had enough ability to express these antisocial, anti economic, and anti political, and frankly devolutionary and destructive instincts and especially seek to undermine all male history of capital accumulation in genetics, behavior, knowledge, institutions, and physical capital and territory, so that women can hyper consume all that accumulated inheritance for nothing more than self gratification by the elimination of their need to share responsibility because they are able to share political choice.
    10. There is a reason why no polities survive when run by women – because the purpose of a polity is to accumulate capital and responsibility for it. And the western group strategy has always been the maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for climbing the ladder of individual freedom liberty citizenship and sovereignty.

    And when a man says women or all women he’s thinking of a normal distribution, because that’s how men view the world, as unequal distributions around a general trend or tendency.

    Why would you even think that a man would presume it was necessary to respond with ‘not all X are like that’? Because it would never occur to men to think that we were the exception while at the same time anyone would conceive of a group of people as other than an unequal distribution around a general tendency or trend.

    I don’t make the laws of the universe.
    I just prevent people from lying about them and evading them at others’ expense – -which is what we call criminal unethical and immoral behavior.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @lleahgold @schizarella


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 15:47:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707059516079030272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707044437681954838

  • WHY DO WOMEN AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM PRESUME THE FALSE DEFAULT OPTION INSTEAD

    WHY DO WOMEN AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM PRESUME THE FALSE DEFAULT OPTION INSTEAD OF TEACHING THE CHALLENGE OF COOPERATION AT SCALE?
    —“Never understood why politics isn’t taught in the light of the vast challenges of getting large groups of people to work together. Same with economics.”—

    This statement is more insightful than obvious at first glance. The question is why, in an educational environment (an artificial monopoly in of an artificial equality), do students and teachers assume the default position that it’s in our interest to always cooperate, when in almost any other circumstance, cooperation is itself a scarcity that must be constructed via incentives to encourage people to pursue the same interests rather than their separate interests, given that their separate interests always and everywhere diverge in context, place, and time?

    Normalcy bias (we think we’re average) and we presume everyone else shares our goals,, values, and interests, when the entirety of the value of human variation especially between the sexes, classes and individual abilities, is that we divide the time space and resources of the universe into individual chunks and therefore together maximize human discovery, innovation, adaptation. Of course we are different. If we were’t we wouldn’t need to be sentient. We are MORE different than other animals. That’s why we specialize in innnovation and adaptation itself, by memor, mind, ,consciousness and frequent cooperation – so that we evolve by ideas fast, not evolve by genetics slowly.

    There is a good reason the administration does not teach manners, ethics, and morality, basic economics, basic law, and basic politics – all of which are market activities within the despotic monopoly that is the education system whose teachers are most often from the bottom 15% of their graduating classes. And where professors are almost always temps instead of employees, and are also from the bottom of their profession. So we pay for professors and we get temps. And we get dumbed down classes for great expense that enslave our people in debt for the privilege of getting access to the labor market – when an IQ test would be sufficient.

    That reason is that the truth is offensive. and by putting face before truth by teaching a presumed falsehood they create political discord in the society rather than fulfilling their duty of producing citizens competent and morally able to participate in our advanced economy, legal system, and politics. And so discord results because they are effectively lied to consistently for the seventeen or more years of educational indoctrination into a falsehood.

    Teachers are fearful of children who return home and question why their parents are losers – because they have the knowledge to understand their parents failings. But this is precisely what is necessary to raise the polity one generation at a time, and continue the development of our collective condition as individuals, families, the economy, and the polity.

    We need to clear the decks in education and rebuild it with very different people teaching very different things, and end the destruction caused by women and the education system that has brought about the present catastrophe – because we didn’t teach our people, ,but more importantly our women correctly before giving them access to teaching, and voting.

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 15:15:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707051266424094720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1707032030985556330

  • I can explain the science behind this difference in our perceptions but its as d

    I can explain the science behind this difference in our perceptions but its as difficult or more so than the difference between feminine and masculine cognition.
    Which if you understand even vaguely, you think it’s amazing we get along at all.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 04:40:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706891584602562643

    Reply addressees: @NeverLessRaven @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706888534538531166

  • RT @JFGariepy: It’s pretty simple: either we convince our women to have babies a

    RT @JFGariepy: It’s pretty simple: either we convince our women to have babies at age 18-26 or civilization is gone. I got receipts. https:…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-27 03:16:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706870355443224683