Usually, I’m correctly accused of being an arrogant effete elitest snob. “Scared and insecure” aren’t part of my emotional vocabulary. However my knowledge that the feminine mind projects itself onto others *is* part of my intellectual vocabulary.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 02:13:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720262934029369702
Reply addressees: @boltsbucsbabe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720261686999801901
SHORT LIST OF FEMININE ABRAHAMIC LEFTIST TACTICS
Loading, Framing, Obscuring
Fiction, the Fictionalism (non-logics)
Outright lying
Evasion, and denial
Reflection and Projection
Accusation and Rolling Accusations
Undermining, Sabotaging, Canceling, Sedition and Treason
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 17:13:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720127086319345922
Reply addressees: @DiggingInTheDi1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720100783142601194
–“Evil men are punished for their bad behavior to a far greater extent than evil women are punished for their bad behavior. Both Machiavellian men and Machiavellian women exist, but men are held accountable more than women. We need to resolve the problem from both ends.”–@taylorburrowes
Yes you are correct. But men’s antisocial behavior is immediately dangerous and women’s antisocial beahvior is cumulatively harmful.
As far as I know I’ve done more work on this subect than anyone else past or present. And the only question that I simply can’t find a comfortable answer to is why do westerners in particular (W.E.I.R.D. culture) tolerate women’s antisocial behavior (undermining to sedition by social warfare), when other civilizations don’t. And when the Common Law did prohibit these behaviors prior to the constitutional era. Gossiping (undermining), and Shrilling (Karens), or anything that ‘disturbed the king’s peace’ by sewing discord was criminalized and we have some interesting records of punishment for it throughout the medieval period.
So women are only recently (since given the vote and entry into the work force) able to use politics and economics to scale their intutions. Yet these intuitions are the polar opposite of those that have made european civilization so disproportionately successful vs the rest. If not for women’s votes – or at least, single women’s votes – we would not have the crisis of the age.
Now, women’s behavior differs from men by a very simple set of variables that are rather obvious in differences in brain organization, neurochemistry, and behavior. Largely, the sexes evolved a division of labor in time, or what we call feminine empathizing in time vs masculine systematizing over time. This resulted in the feminine prey dominance in cognition and the masculine predator dominance in cognition. And together these resulted in masculine search for status and reproductive advantage by seeking responsibilty for private an common capital despite the risks of doing so, versus the feminine search for hyperconsumption, hypergamy, and irresponsibilty for common capital because of the risk involved in conflict and settlement of disputes over common capital.
Thats really the difference and that’s all of it. And that’s also what’s evidenced in sex differences in antisocial behavior, as well as sex differences in moral intution, and sex differences in political bias. Men for for maximizing individual responsibility and women vote for minimizing individual responsibility. For the reasons I’ve stated.
This only changes when women have three or more children, and then they carry the burden of the behavior of children the way men carry the burden of behavior of all of society – including the dangerous men.
It’s really that simple. 😉
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner @taylorburrowes @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 18:36:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719785589673689088
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719774736018747769
Again, (a) yes, but (b) it turns out he problem is just women voters, or rather single women voters, and there are a lot of them. WIthout single women voters and their instincts, incentives and indoctrinations, none of the leftward motion would have occurred.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 16:29:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719753445215711723
Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14 @nickdixoncomic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719752068905242831
QUOTES FROM THE TEAM TODAY
–“Feminists are a double failure – bad at being women, and worse at being men.”– Brad
–“The left are lying by conflating location with nation.”– Brad
–“I would consider our organization, not as reaction but as circumvention and innovation” — Brad
–“We need wholesale replacement of the irresponsbile people with responsible people despite that conservatives want to be left alone – you have to defend against the busybodies – it’s just self defense. You can’t end diligence in self defense”– (variation on theme by both brad and brandon)
–“most local political orgs are social clubs not responsible organizations trying to produce an optimum outcome”– (variation on theme by brandon)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 22:13:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719477732143243264
RT @curtdoolittle: @Jake64533383814 @JohnArthurRyan THE “I THINKS” OF WHY WE LOST
I think the pill, abortion, ending liability for the inte…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 18:03:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719414908628930832
THE “I THINKS” OF WHY WE LOST
I think the pill, abortion, ending liability for the interference in a marriage, enacting involuntary marriage (common law marriage, state imposed marrage), no fault divorce, common property, alimony, and child support, especially child support for non-biological children was a catastrophe and there is no escaping it.
I think giving women the vote without giving them a separate lower house of government was a catastrophe because women think speak and act (and vote) against responsibility in everything they do – despite that our civilization’s success is almost entirely cauased by our maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for individual rights. Multi-house government exists to produce and test concurrency between the regions and classes. We neede another house for the sexes. This would create a market for the production of commons that preserved the interests of the minority (productive men in this case) from mob rule (women).
I think introgression of women into the workforce displaced men from the more family-friendly jobs more than added a contribution, and then offshoring male jobs displaced those displaced. Immigration has only exacerbated that problem dramatically.
I think all productivity contributed by women’s addition to the workforce has been consumed by increases in taxation. An I know for certain that it’s destroying our rates of reproduction necessary to maintain benefits and services.
I think we misunderstand our failure to make good use of and prevent bad use of fiat currency, and we tend to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I think the abuse of the pretense of eternal growth to rely on intergenerational redistribution via the benefits system, instead of using the singapore method of saving and investing is the bigger problem. I think interest on consumer purchase of capital like homes and durable goods is a crime. (I’m correct). I think taxation that’ contributed to the general pool and isn’t itemized as expense, debt, and repayment, is a crime.
When I say “I think” It really means “I know”. 😉 I’m just being polite. 😉
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @Jake64533383814 @JohnArthurRyan
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 18:03:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719414855109603328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719409976748462501
I’d have to understand what you mean by ‘never get’ what?
The feminine mind empathizes in time while the masculine systematizes over time.
This produces a concept of individuals vs polities.
The feminine mind will demonstrate the “NAXALT/AXALT” fallacies. It’s the easiest method of identifying sex differences in cognition.
The feminine mind will react against individual pressure to adapt. The masculine mind wont. Because having to think instead of feel requires self regulation, and the feminine mind seek to depend on feeling rather than thinking whenever possible.
Reply addressees: @JayWalk87598457 @lleahgold @schizarella
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 16:14:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719387499066269699
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719373944736653428
There are factions. Some are bad. Some are good. Just like your generation has absolutely immature infantilized cowardly uselees males, and some of the opposite. The early 20th created the false promise of the end of scarcity and the promise of endless growth. That dream ended in the 70s. Nixon-to-Regan’s financialization kept it working through the 90’s. But by then we’d exhausted both financialization and our economic leverage over the developing world. This crashed in 08. And we should have a world macro crisis reorganizing the world between 2020and 2035. Right now it’s starting and building momentum.
But the unerlying problem is really just women – or more im portantly, single women. That’s who determines the vote. And that’s who the politiy and economy pander to. And women will never vote for or advance responsibilty, agency, or competition.
Reply addressees: @RealDanielShays @sqpatrick77
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-30 14:21:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718996619775885312
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718995179955220909
No. And get ready: female employment is the greatest prophylactic … as long as you don’t promote underclass reproduction and instead, radically constrain it.
War is however one of the four means of radical reorganization of society. And often for the worse.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-29 22:59:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718764448406454438
Reply addressees: @PatrickSRRAUSCH @DreadBobby1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718762114746024343