Theme: Sex Differences

  • NEVER. It would mean human extinction. It’s irrational to care for children and

    NEVER.
    It would mean human extinction.
    It’s irrational to care for children and others as women do.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 17:23:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720491985964835219

    Reply addressees: @sorkaridorkar @_dDeltaDt @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720491176447402281

  • “Q: Curt what are your thoughts on the positive impact of women on society, say,

    –“Q: Curt what are your thoughts on the positive impact of women on society, say, as expressed in the image of Madonna and child (Isis and Horus, Mary and Christ etc),”–

    1. Humans are superpredators.
    2. But we are also social because of the distproportionate value of cooperation – even indirect cooperation.
    3. So we all seek signals of non-aggression almost first before all other signals.
    4. Women specialize in signals of non aggression
    Despite that women aggress via interpersonal and social warfare – it’s at least not physical and immediate even if it is cumulatively just as harmful.
    5. Beauty is the presence of resources – that’s all. We tend to prefer a presence of resources created by the hand of man. And the demadn for truth and beauty is a demand for extra effort when producing commons.
    6. Women promise both non aggression a presence of resources not the least of which are care and reproduction.

    “Men are a threat and women are an opportunity”

    So in the arts we use these symbols of women to identify and promote the status of non aggression and resources which are essentially peace offerings: plenty.

    Religions consist of systematizing signals of non aggression, to limit conflict, alienation, and the mental instability of neuroticism as populations increase and our individual ‘value’ to others decreases.

    So Religions use the feminine just as the State (military and politics) use the masculine: scarcity.

    It’s just physics at play at scale. And it’s so obvious that we want to find more to it than that.

    Cheers.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @Alexanderistalt @MillionMustMeme @seracoate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 16:13:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720474337516351488

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720471316745138580

  • Because they are not fooled by idiosyncratic examples using empathy of an indivi

    Because they are not fooled by idiosyncratic examples using empathy of an individual case to make a general argument. Women are interpersonally good, socially helpful in some circumstances, but economically, politically and strategically disasterous. The inverse applies to men.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:40:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720466034287583727

    Reply addressees: @dbdeg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1663020094027362304

  • Nina; Women seek (a) attention (b) empathizing (c) emotional reward (self assura

    Nina;

    Women seek (a) attention (b) empathizing (c) emotional reward (self assurance, suppression of neurorticism) (d) in time.

    Men seek (b) opportunity for productivity (b) systematizing (understanding), (c) capitalization, (d) over time.

    Feels in-time.
    Reals over-time.

    We could say one is better than the other but it’s just a division of labor between taking care of individuals in need vs organizing to supply the resources needed for all the polity irrespectively.

    Marriage is an optium agreement between the sexes. The incentives no longer favor marriage. The problem is children require at least both parents, and for mental health require male parents more than female.

    So we must solve this problem.

    Reply addressees: @moonlit_misfit


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:38:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720465560696238080

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662831614697652226

  • RT @Jeff_Weimer: @GumSlinger @neontaster Orwell knew: “It was always the women,

    RT @Jeff_Weimer: @GumSlinger @neontaster Orwell knew:

    “It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted ad…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:31:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720463716636860505

  • Her objective was to obtain attention by claiming she was worthy of attention. A

    Her objective was to obtain attention by claiming she was worthy of attention.

    Always seek to determine (a) what responsibility women are avoiding and (b) what attention they are trying to seek or avoid.

    Whatever else they are doing is just an excuse to demonstrate or pursue responsibilty evasion and obtain or evade attention.

    Once you see it (and baiting into hazard as well (seduction in social and political matters)) you can’t unsee it.

    Reply addressees: @MillionMustMeme @seracoate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:29:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720463312448585728

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717914100532167145

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo —“Why are we contin

    RT @curtdoolittle: @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo —“Why are we continually surprised by the level of evil women will do?”—Brya…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:26:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720462568064487716

  • “Why are we continually surprised by the level of evil women will do?”—Bryan W

    —“Why are we continually surprised by the level of evil women will do?”—Bryan
    We discussed this in a recent staff meeting because it was the most significant outstanding question in understanding the current crisis.

    And it turns out that while the ‘true nature of women’ was preserved until women were given the vote, it’s a western metaphysical, cultural, traditional presumption that began with women taking care of the farms (business) while men fought in the summers, through the medieval period’s attempt to domesticate men via chivalric ethics – which didn’t work until the rise of the middle class – through the victorian period that sought to domesticate the underclasses into middle class behavior as the industrial revolution took hold on society – through the progressive movement by the new england protestant women to advance the black vote, as precursor to advance the women’s vote – through the postwar NeoMarxist-Postmodern-Feminist sequence to undermine the west using women and minorities (just as they had with christianity).

    No other civilization lionizes women outside of their roles in family. And every other civilization except those that have followed our model (japan, korea) has maintained the traditional tradition of contraining women to the domain of emotions and outside of the demotions of management, government, and war.

    I’m still working on this question a bit, and I’ll continue until I’ve falsified it down to the sequence of first principles. But as far as I know, this answer (above) is correct. It’s one of the many reasons why the west differs so greatly from the rest, such that we are “W.E.I.R.D.” Because we gave women responsibility and held them to it at the level of their competency, and maintained laws and customs that prevented the exercise of their natural antisocial to antipolitical behavior. In other words, our laws and customs limiting female anti-social/anti-political behavior: the demand for agency without responsibility, and the demand for irresponsibilty in all things, by social wafare
    using “GSRRM” or the sequence of ‘undermining to canceling to sedition to treason’ – therby using the weapon they evolved to rally males against alphas so that women (or just females back then) could control their reproduction and mazimize the number of males from which they could extract resources.

    These laws and traditions we no longer enforce because of our hypothesis of an equality among humans that does not exist and cannot exist, and if it existed we would not only no longer be human – we would no longer be conscious beings, and we would regress to the bottom of the distribution – which is exactly what’s happening as women and their demand for irresponsibilty is propagated through the civilization through the democratic institutions without defense against the feminine instinct to promote anti-social to anti-political behaivor.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @lporiginalg @DarnelSugarfoo


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 15:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720462492134969344

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720454144769556681

  • The feminine mind is trivially simple – that’s why there are no known theretical

    The feminine mind is trivially simple – that’s why there are no known theretical female innovators. It’s the sophistication with which you naturally evade responsibilty, deny, lie, redirect, accuse, and undermine that’s interesting. Just as you have done here in two tweets and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 02:23:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720265374866837919

    Reply addressees: @boltsbucsbabe

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720263854171525248

  • The feminine mind is trivially simple – that’s why there are no known theretical

    The feminine mind is trivially simple – that’s why there are no known theretical female innovators. It’s the sophistication with which you naturally evade responsibilty, deny, lie, redirect, accuse, and undermine that’s interesting. Just as you have done here in two tweets and where you cannot control yourself – because the feminine instinct is so overwhelming you cannot gain agency over it. 😉

    Every single one of you who tries always fails. All you do is prove me right.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 02:23:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720265374711652352