it”s completely unfair. Russians and Ukrainians have this endless supply of beautiful women to use in every possible means of promotion. We’re surrounded and marketed to by feminine beauty. They don’t even have to be creative. They just put beautiful women next to some product or other, and you’re riveted. It’s just wrong. We’re reduced to mere brain stems. lol (There’s no better way to die.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-15 13:48:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/What-do-American-girls-think-about-Chinese-guys
https://www.quora.com/What-do-American-girls-think-about-Chinese-guys
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2014/05/07/seen-at-11-positive-pregnancy-tests-up-for-sale-online/”95% OF THE WOMEN ARE TRYING TO ENTRAP MEN”
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-08 02:08:00 UTC
COMPLEMENTARITY
—“Complementarity — The view that “men and women complement one another as separate parts that together make up a composite whole.” Also called complementarism. Related to the empirical view that men and women have different psychologies and are thus suited to different, complementary roles in society. Both men and women are seen as responsible for contributing “civilizing influence” to society as a whole, beginning with the atomic unit of society, the family. Among Reactionaries, most strains of feminism are seen as exacerbating male-female conflict and mortgaging long-term social vigor for the fleeting rewards of frivolity, hypergamy, and juvenilism. By the same token, misogyny, adultery, domestic abuse, fatherly irresponsibility, and the incessant whining of “men’s rights activists” are frowned upon as encouraging the same conflicts. Reactionaries acknowledge that securing the future depends on raising children in a stable and nurturing environment with a father and mother, and that the selfish desires of parents are secondary to this central goal. Without children, a culture simply self-terminates. Idolizing childlessness is a form of cultural suicide.”—by Michael Anissimov
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-05 04:14:00 UTC
http://www.amazon.com/The-Essential-Difference-Female-Brains/dp/046500556X/IT’S TAKEN A WHILE. BUT SCIENCE HAS DONE THE WORK.
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-04 11:59:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2014-04-30 15:13:00 UTC
[W]omen are more comfortable with free riding and with charity, and men are extremely conservative about resources. Women happily sacrifice for their children. Men cautiously sacrifice for their tribe. Women advocate for their children regardless of their merits, while men are more parsimonious because they desire the strongest tribe. For men, a woman and his children are just the smallest possible tribe that he can lead. For a woman, it is very risky, especially in the ignorance of youth, to choose just one man upon which to risk her future. While men cannot articulate this set of intuitions and strategies, women often confuse the difference in evolutionary strategies between men and women. And particularly the difference between a woman’s offspring, and a man’s tribe. I’ve seen so many marriages where the woman expects the man to have the same interest toward her and the children, as she has. And there are some men who approach a woman’s sacrifice. But for the majority of us, it is a very bad investment. And with the state making it impossible for us to save for retirement, given our shorter productive life spans, and greater specialization, and greater variation – it’s now an extremely bad idea to engage in marriage. [M]arriage is an artificial construct. For a man, he is best off if he trades productivity (no longer protection) and affection for as many women as he can get attention from. And a woman’s best interest is to form a group with other women and select from different men what she wants and needs. This is how we evolved: everyone having sex with everyone else – some of which was for bond building, and some of which was for the purpose of reproduction. Any society that does not maintain at least the nuclear family will be dominated an exterminated by those that do.
[W]omen are more comfortable with free riding and with charity, and men are extremely conservative about resources. Women happily sacrifice for their children. Men cautiously sacrifice for their tribe. Women advocate for their children regardless of their merits, while men are more parsimonious because they desire the strongest tribe. For men, a woman and his children are just the smallest possible tribe that he can lead. For a woman, it is very risky, especially in the ignorance of youth, to choose just one man upon which to risk her future. While men cannot articulate this set of intuitions and strategies, women often confuse the difference in evolutionary strategies between men and women. And particularly the difference between a woman’s offspring, and a man’s tribe. I’ve seen so many marriages where the woman expects the man to have the same interest toward her and the children, as she has. And there are some men who approach a woman’s sacrifice. But for the majority of us, it is a very bad investment. And with the state making it impossible for us to save for retirement, given our shorter productive life spans, and greater specialization, and greater variation – it’s now an extremely bad idea to engage in marriage. [M]arriage is an artificial construct. For a man, he is best off if he trades productivity (no longer protection) and affection for as many women as he can get attention from. And a woman’s best interest is to form a group with other women and select from different men what she wants and needs. This is how we evolved: everyone having sex with everyone else – some of which was for bond building, and some of which was for the purpose of reproduction. Any society that does not maintain at least the nuclear family will be dominated an exterminated by those that do.
POLITICAL BIAS AS BRAIN DAMAGE?
Libertarianism and progressivism as brain damage and underdevelopment?
If you make a male out of a female by in-utero brain damage, and the growth of compensatory brain structures, that deprive the male of experiential empathy and exaggerate physicality. Then why is not libertarian moral bias just additional brain damage that also limits moral empathy? Why is not progressive bias a failure to masculinize the brain structure? And is conservatism then the only normal? Thats what science would suggest.
Progressives have been trying to use findings of cognitive science to demonize conservatives. But it turns out that it’s Progressives who demonstrate brain damage (or more likely, inadequate brain development). Libertarians as well, although I find that with libertarians I an explain it as the product of behavioral abilities. And I suspect that I can explain progressive ‘brain damage’ as the product of their abilities. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2014-04-17 07:58:00 UTC