Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • It’s called Paedomorphic Evolution: Genetic Pacification selecting for lower mat

    It’s called Paedomorphic Evolution: Genetic Pacification selecting for lower maturity – the “juvenile”. One of which is Gracilization: loss of bone mass. The ‘strange’ sexual interests of the Japanese (and the asians) and our men’s attraction to Asian women, is very likely due to the greater paedomorphism of the asians and the lower levels of testosterone. The east and the west have been engaging in genetic pacification over a long long time. The rest of the world has not. Because they were unable to reduce the bottom population.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-21 01:50:00 UTC

  • ON WOMEN VOTERS (from elsewhere) Only thing I tend to suggest is that women need

    ON WOMEN VOTERS

    (from elsewhere)

    Only thing I tend to suggest is that women need a separate house of government limited to short term decisions, and men to focus on the long term.

    This creates a market between the genders just as marriage and mating create a market between the genders.

    The problem with our government is that it was a market between men of different classes each who represented families and extended families and manors. It was an extension of the family.

    We violated the family by giving women power over the destruction of the family in favor of short term wants.

    No one is really at fault here. We just didn’t know and as westerners we were utopian in the first place, and secondly, we were wealthy from the new era of atlantic trade, and expanding colonies.

    Wealth makes us less risk averse. We needed to be more cautious.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-18 07:05:00 UTC

  • THE JOY OF SEX ERA, THE PORN ERA, AND THE REALITY IN THE MIDDLE. (promoted to po

    THE JOY OF SEX ERA, THE PORN ERA, AND THE REALITY IN THE MIDDLE.

    (promoted to post) (adult content) (sex) (from elsewhere)

    In my demographic were were trained by “the Joy of Sex” movement – the current incarnation of that strategy is ‘tantric’ sex. Slow and romantic.

    The past generation has been trained by pornography. Rather aggressive, and … classless

    The truth is somewhere in the middle.

    Best advice I ever got came in parts from one of those guys who despite being near forty, keeps literally dozens of women going at any one point:

    – Spend the whole day or more in seduction starting with clear suggestions, and followed infrequently by subtle suggestions. I have a very, very, hard time turning my brain off. I can’t imagine what it’s like for women to shut it off. it’s freaking chaos in their heads at all times anyway. So help them.

    – The first time, you must blow her mind, and leave her exhausted. The memory has to stick. This I have found true.

    – The inner woman desires your inner gorilla. Same for women and men: ladies and gentlemen in public, gorillas in bed. But mix it up. One issue is that a lot of sexual excitement comes from novelty (which is why studies of frequent porn users is discouraging for lovers, but probably good for crime rates and prostate glands.) so without mixing it up you must lose interest over time – unless it is primarily an act of intimacy.

    If you listen to, and submit to, your inner gorilla, and use your WHOLE body, rather than either overthinking at one end of the spectrum, or just ‘using your dick as a spear’ on the other end of the spectrum; and then when you get ‘close’, then slow down, use the rest of your body, and prolong it – I think of running in sprints – you’re generally going to do well for your other half.

    For couples:

    – Have sex as often as possible so that it’s a desired habit – an outlet you depend upon, and not an effort in seduction to get started ’cause that will end. That way when either of you is stressed you want each other, and that’s good. I knew an older couple with a lot of kids that snuck off to a hotel for a night once a month to keep it lively. It seemed to work.

    – Never go to bed angry. And keep the sex dirty and the arguments clean.

    – The relationship has to outlive the kids. Many women fuck this up. Kids are often easier (cheap) sources of affection. But they grow up and leave. Meanwhile you didn’t maintain your husband and he’s now trained to not want or contribute affection. Keeping a family cannot be done without a woman watering all in it with affection. So it’s not that your husband is helping you with the kids. Its that your husband wants you for affection just like your kids, not because he intrinsically gets the same joy from them that you do. He might get some. But a mother’s joy is a chemical dependency created by evolution and men do not have it. We think about the tribe, our mates, and the kids, with relatively equal weight. Women specialize in kids and mates, and the tribe is usually not even in her mind.

    Anyway. Maybe that will help someone. I dunno. I wish someone had told me all that when I was sixteen. lol.

    Cheers

    (BTW: Just so I don’t sound like a know-it-all, or because I think I’m some kind of stud or something, cause i’m neither: I’ve been in almost nothing but long term relationships, I am probably a little less interest in sex than average – and more in intimacy – so its more of a romantic thing for me. And my life’s challenge is that asthma is not your friend at these most important of moments and must be managed. So that’s my preemptive counter to the peanut gallery’s potential criticisms that I think I’m full of myself or something.)

    Oh and women are full of shit. Ferraris work. Sorry. They do.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-18 07:02:00 UTC

  • not intelligence, helps men have more sex,” says Dr. Hopcroft, the UNC sociologi

    http://www.maxim.com/maxim-man/does-intelligence-affect-your-sex-life-2016-1—““Money, not intelligence, helps men have more sex,” says Dr. Hopcroft, the UNC sociologist. “In and of itself, intellect won’t do the trick. But intelligence helps them get money.””—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-17 12:49:00 UTC

  • FOUNDATIONS AS REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES RESULTING FROM GENDER BIAS IN COOPERATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/09/28/moral-foundations-as-property-rights/MORAL FOUNDATIONS AS REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES RESULTING FROM GENDER BIAS IN COOPERATION

    FEMININE COOPERATION BIAS (BUILD OFFSPRING)

    1. Proportionality/cheating, Justice, treating others in proportion to their actions. (The asset of goods.)

    2. Care/harm for others, protecting them from harm. (The asset of life and body.)

    MASCULINE (BETA) COOPERATION BIAS (OBTAIN OFFSPRING)

    3. Liberty/Oppression, characterizes judgments in terms of whether subjects are tyrannized. (The asset of time, opportunity.)

    MASCULINE (ALPHA) COMMONS BIASES (COMPETITIVE TRIBE OF MALES)

    And three others can be expressed as community property rights covering social capital.

    4. In-Group Loyalty/In-Group Betrayal to/of your group, family, nation, polity.

    5. Respect/Authority/Subversion for tradition and legitimate authority.

    6. Purity/Sanctity/Degradation/Disgust, avoiding disgusting things, foods, actions.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-16 05:30:00 UTC

  • 1 – We have evolved instincts that inform is about the demands of reality. 2 – W

    1 – We have evolved instincts that inform is about the demands of reality.

    2 – We vary in those instincts because of our class and gender demands of reality.

    3 – Like the physics of the natural world, all of our instincts are reducible to problems of existence, information, and ability.

    4 – Our instincts have an evolutionary purpose.

    5 – We do not have instincts for arbitrary reasons.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-15 07:29:00 UTC

  • The Propertarian (Doolittle) Scientific Political Chart

    [T]he only meaningful notion of ‘right’ and ‘left’ that I can state existentially is k-selection (right/masculine ), vs r-selection (left/feminine-universal) since these are opposing strategies with libertarianism (voluntary cooperation) achievable as a compromise between the two strategies. (that is how I see we minority libertarians: providing a compromise between the genders through voluntary cooperation). As far as I know we must talk in at least three dimensions to discuss options on political orders. 1 - Organization of production - distribution of property 2 - Organization of production of the commons - the fruits of production 3 - Organization of Reproduction - National(kin) or Corporate(kin-independent) And to construct these organizations we require incentives: 4 - Weapon of Influence (methods of organization) So it is indeed impossible to construct an r-selected order non-parasitically. Because that’s precisely what it means. And it is so because we must produce incentive to engage in costly production if we are human (k-selection), even though the herd must just graze on whatever grass is available (r-selection). This is the Doolittle chart, not the Nolan Chart. This chart unifies all disciplines from biology to politics to economics. This chart is consistently explanatory across all political orders. So as far as I know any OTHER method of representing the organization of Production(consumption), commons(investment) and reproduction(perpetuation) is a distraction for the purpose of achieving an alternate end other than the true and moral. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Propertarian (Doolittle) Scientific Political Chart

    [T]he only meaningful notion of ‘right’ and ‘left’ that I can state existentially is k-selection (right/masculine ), vs r-selection (left/feminine-universal) since these are opposing strategies with libertarianism (voluntary cooperation) achievable as a compromise between the two strategies. (that is how I see we minority libertarians: providing a compromise between the genders through voluntary cooperation). As far as I know we must talk in at least three dimensions to discuss options on political orders. 1 - Organization of production - distribution of property 2 - Organization of production of the commons - the fruits of production 3 - Organization of Reproduction - National(kin) or Corporate(kin-independent) And to construct these organizations we require incentives: 4 - Weapon of Influence (methods of organization) So it is indeed impossible to construct an r-selected order non-parasitically. Because that’s precisely what it means. And it is so because we must produce incentive to engage in costly production if we are human (k-selection), even though the herd must just graze on whatever grass is available (r-selection). This is the Doolittle chart, not the Nolan Chart. This chart unifies all disciplines from biology to politics to economics. This chart is consistently explanatory across all political orders. So as far as I know any OTHER method of representing the organization of Production(consumption), commons(investment) and reproduction(perpetuation) is a distraction for the purpose of achieving an alternate end other than the true and moral. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • THE DOOLITTLE (SCIENTIFIC) POLITICAL CHART The only meaningful notion of ‘right’

    THE DOOLITTLE (SCIENTIFIC) POLITICAL CHART

    The only meaningful notion of ‘right’ and ‘left’ that I can state existentially is k-selection (right/masculine ), vs r-selection (left/feminine-universal) since these are opposing strategies with libertarianism (voluntary cooperation) achievable as a compromise between the two strategies. (that is how I see we minority libertarians: providing a compromise between the genders through voluntary cooperation).

    As far as I know we must talk in at least three dimensions to discuss options on political orders.

    1 – Organization of production – distribution of property

    <—centralized—————-meritocratic—————–equal—>

    <—tyranny———————-liberty———————-communism->

    2 – Organization of production of the commons – the fruits of production

    <—-centralized—————meritocratic—————- equal—>

    <—-tyranny———————–liberty——————–communism->

    3 – Organization of Reproduction – National(kin) or Corporate(kin-independent)

    <—-authoritarian(personal)—–kin/nation————corporate–>

    <—-???——————————Eugenic—————Dysgenic—>

    <—K-selection…………………. merit selection…….. r-selection—>

    And to construct these organizations we require incentives:

    4 – Weapon of Influence (methods of organization)

    <—-Violence———————–Exchange————-Gossip——–>

    <—-Loss of Life/harm…..loss of consumption….loss of cooperation–>

    <—-Promise of safety….promise of consumption… promise of cooperation->

    So it is indeed impossible to construct an r-selected order non-parasitically. Because that’s precisely what it means. And it is so because we must produce incentive to engage in costly production if we are human (k-selection), even though the herd must just graze on whatever grass is available (r-selection).

    This is the Doolittle chart, not the Nolan Chart.

    This chart unifies all disciplines from biology to politics to economics.

    This chart is consistently explanatory across all political orders.

    So as far as I know any OTHER method of representing the organization of Production(consumption), commons(investment) and reproduction(perpetuation) is a distraction for the purpose of achieving an alternate end other than the true and moral.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-13 05:28:00 UTC

  • LOLZ I don’t usually do humor but this was awesome

    http://vidmax.com/video/132592-Model-Nicole-Arbour-goes-ballistic-on-feminists-with-a-comical-rant-that-s-hard-to-disagree-withOMFG LOLZ

    I don’t usually do humor but this was awesome

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-12 17:59:00 UTC