Theme: Sex Differences

  • Curious watchful boys and precocious incessantly talkative little girls. Familie

    Curious watchful boys and precocious incessantly talkative little girls. Families rock.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-20 02:56:00 UTC

  • Like a rose: Women are as beautiful. They smell as heavenly. They feel as soft a

    Like a rose:

    Women are as beautiful.

    They smell as heavenly.

    They feel as soft as the petals.

    But a man must be careful with them,

    beceause they have thorns.

    🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-14 06:10:00 UTC

  • NW White vs NE Asian delta. 1) Cranial size. 2) Distribution width. 3) Verbal vs

    NW White vs NE Asian delta.

    1) Cranial size.

    2) Distribution width.

    3) Verbal vs abstract

    4) Sexual maturity.

    Their average is better

    Our best are better.

    North Sea White vs Han/Korean/Japanese

    Basically you want a big round head, limited sexual maturity, and as much verbal intelligence as you can get, followed by as much analytic intelligence as you can get.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-02 05:35:00 UTC

  • We Agree to Grant Women Equal Rights to Property…

    [W]e agree, with the provisions… ***”We agree to grant you equal rights in matters of property under the provision that you limit reproduction to kin, and create no moral hazard by bearing offspring that the rest of us must pay to raise and insure. Why? Because it is not necessary to grant you equal rights in any matter. It is merely beneficial for all of us if we do. But this benefit cannot come at the cost of our kin. Or it is of no benefit at all.”*** (there we go) I’ve been framing a counter argument for feminists equal to ‘why don’t I kill you’ as a basis for cooperation. This quote as the same argumentative starting point.

  • We Agree to Grant Women Equal Rights to Property…

    [W]e agree, with the provisions… ***”We agree to grant you equal rights in matters of property under the provision that you limit reproduction to kin, and create no moral hazard by bearing offspring that the rest of us must pay to raise and insure. Why? Because it is not necessary to grant you equal rights in any matter. It is merely beneficial for all of us if we do. But this benefit cannot come at the cost of our kin. Or it is of no benefit at all.”*** (there we go) I’ve been framing a counter argument for feminists equal to ‘why don’t I kill you’ as a basis for cooperation. This quote as the same argumentative starting point.

  • ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of th

    ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of the industrial revolution. The Feminist movement was developed in an effort to replace Patriarchy with Matriarchy. But there is a reason no societies are Matriarchal: they are easily conquered if men do not defend the female herd from other male packs. In other words, one of the central problems with the formation of any ‘society’ is providing men with the incentive to defend a commons.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-29 14:24:00 UTC

  • WESTERNERS, READ IT AND WEEP. SO TRUE. THE INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST. —“From

    WESTERNERS, READ IT AND WEEP. SO TRUE. THE INFANTILIZATION OF THE WEST.

    —“From my perspective, most Western men do not know how to pursue women. Not to be blaming or accusing one gender, but I don’t understand this relationship mentality. Men are not men, women are not women. I feel as if I have to play both roles if being in a relationship. When do people draw the lines between being a child or an adult? I’ve never seen a couple in Ukraine being okay with dirty dishes, laundry, and clutter in the house verses in the states people are okay living in one big mess while avoiding conversations so that they can play “Candy Crush.”” — Kristina Protsenko


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-28 02:37:00 UTC

  • MEN, WOMEN, FRIENDSHIPS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND DISCOUNTS Men tend to have a larger

    MEN, WOMEN, FRIENDSHIPS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND DISCOUNTS

    Men tend to have a larger number of looser friendships, and women a small number of deeper friendships.

    This is partly because of how we judge each other – women need psychological similarity whereas men need utilitarian similarity.

    It is also a matter of what we do with friends. And what we need friends for. Women put men in the friend zone for certain reasons: capital extraction. (discounts).

    Men put women in the friend zone for three reasons: long options on sex, long options on her associations, long options on her emotional support (as a psychologist).

    And men put men in the friend zone for lots of reasons: the safety of the pack. assistance in self improvement. Options on opportunities. And someone to imitate or learn one or more skills from.

    Now also, men have many strategies available to us: research information to create opportunities. Create relationships and collect and exchange information to identify opportunities. Organize in pursuit of opportunities. Produce and opportunistically seize identifiable opportunities. Produce consistently independent of possible opportunities. Produce as little, consume as little, and relax as much as possible. These strategies depend upon our natural abilities. (this is probably something that doesn’t occur to people)

    I would say that if you mean that we should be cautious with others rent-seeking and discounting, that this is true as far as it goes.

    I think it is better to seek to understand the individual male’s strategy, and to limit one’s self to it.

    I mean, those guys in college that figure out how to make money doing just about everything – they are amazing. But so is the scientist and so is the craftsman, and so is the laborer.

    I think what isn’t amazing – what we must watch out for – is a disconnect between a man’s abilities and his strategy.

    The same for women. I think we are too easily led (I certainly am) by their attention, when we have zero option of obtaining returns.

    Parasitism is not unique to gender. We are just wired to tolerate the parasitism of women because options (lottery tickets) on sex are so valuable to us.

    Men give women attention, the way that the poor buy lottery tickets: a very, very, very remote hope that they know will never occur. So that they buy the experience of the fantasy.

    So I think your (James) message is to preserve all your capital. But I am too well aware that every person I meet is a cheap put on opportunity, and I treat them as such. Hence, make a good impression but always be too busy to invest in the fulfillment of others’ opportunities unless it benefits you as much or more than them.

    In business I usually say this “Work with partners with whom you have equal economic interest”. Otherwise you do not have the same interests.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-25 02:44:00 UTC

  • Apparently Sheryl Sandberg hasn’t seen the stats on female CEOs

    Apparently Sheryl Sandberg hasn’t seen the stats on female CEOs.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 14:25:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690903175478513664

    Reply addressees: @wef

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690896888602718208


    IN REPLY TO:

    @wef

    Sheryl Sandberg: ‘Men still run the world – and it’s not going that well’ https://t.co/6INYFUdOob #gendergap #wef https://t.co/MYe5C1WUyL

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690896888602718208

  • #wef #libertarian #AltRight #NRx #Conservative MEN: So ether we have UNIVERSAL e

    #wef #libertarian #AltRight #NRx #Conservative MEN: So ether we have UNIVERSAL equality in all jobs – or are women just seeking privileges?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-23 11:54:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690865300703711233