Why are we the #NewRight? Because we rely on science, evidence, demonstrated preference – not wishful thinking. Empiricism = Conservatism.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-02 03:19:00 UTC
Theme: Science
-
We claim it is Greek Philosophy. But it is Greek reason, Roman law, English scie
We claim it is Greek Philosophy. But it is Greek reason, Roman law, English science, and enfranchisement via the militia that made the west.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 05:04:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715766807840342016
-
We claim it is Greek Philosophy. But it is Greek reason, Roman law, English scie
We claim it is Greek Philosophy. But it is Greek reason, Roman law, English science, and enfranchisement via the militia that made the west.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 01:05:00 UTC
-
True. However critics call it unscientific. It’s an analogy. Its meaningful. It
True. However critics call it unscientific. It’s an analogy. Its meaningful. It isn’t causal. Ergo it’s meaningful not true.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-31 06:38:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715428127720284160
Reply addressees: @BobDude15
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715427096164569088
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715427096164569088
-
Rothbard (Jewish Justificationary), Hoppe (German Rational), Doolittle (Anglo Em
Rothbard (Jewish Justificationary), Hoppe (German Rational), Doolittle (Anglo Empirical). We solved social science in three generations.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 07:25:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714352620329177088
-
WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE #NewRight Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law (vision but
WE SOLVED SOCIAL SCIENCE
#NewRight
Aristotle and Plato : Natural Law
(vision but failure)
Augustine and The Church.
(incremental improvement – but failure)
Hobbes, Locke, Smith and Hume
(incremental improvement but bordering on science)
Menger (Austrian/Galacian Science – German Rational tradition) 1840
Mises (Jewish/Galacian pseudoscience – jewish legal tradition) 1881
Hayek (German/Anglo Empirical – Adopted Anglo legal tradition) 1899
(failure again, with only hayek discovering that it is law not economics that produces social science)
Rothbard (Jewish/Russian Justification -Jewish legal tradition)1926
Hoppe (German Rational – Continental legal tradition), 1949
Doolittle (Anglo Empirical – Anglo Saxon legal tradition). 1959
(success)
Rothbard, Doolittle, and Hoppe. We solved social science in three generations.
The only social science possible is the common law: the discovery of means of violating the requirement for productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, limited to positive externalities of the same. Economics is the study of information and incentives to cooperate.
The basis of natural law is disproportionate value of cooperation.
The language of natural law is economic, not moral.
It was the failure of prior generations to rely upon financial and economic language rather than religious and moral language that prevented the solution to the problem of the social sciences. Morality is economic. It must be. Since we are part of the physical universe.
This is where Hayek ended up. He was right. But even he could not escape his language. And even he did not know how to solve the problem of truth.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 04:05:00 UTC
-
Rothbard (Jewish Justificationary), Hoppe (German Rational), Doolittle (Anglo Em
Rothbard (Jewish Justificationary), Hoppe (German Rational), Doolittle (Anglo Empirical). We solved social science in three generations. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-28 03:25:00 UTC
-
Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience i
Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience in human nature, usually at scale.
Finance like philosophy is a subject we cannot directly experience, but gives us facts about human nature at scale.
There is a reason programmers and finance people think somewhat differently from engineers and physicists. Their subject is the mind of man, not the limits of the material universe.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:52:00 UTC
-
( I leave political literature for you folks. I don’t do literature. I do scienc
( I leave political literature for you folks. I don’t do literature. I do science. Literature is largely propaganda. Institutions like law and money are a scientific problem. )
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:43:00 UTC
-
There are many good people in this world. We communicate in different languages.
There are many good people in this world. We communicate in different languages. Dreams, Experiences, Morals, Reason, History, Science.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:32:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712995473804632064