Theme: Science

  • DISTINGUISHING PHILOSOPHY FROM MORAL LITERATURE (getting better at saying this)

    DISTINGUISHING PHILOSOPHY FROM MORAL LITERATURE

    (getting better at saying this)

    Most ‘philosophers’ are either ‘readers’ narrating the story of their learning, or dreamers, sharing the story of their dreams, or teachers, reciting the plot lines of moral literature.

    History, The Common Law and Economics are the three empirical tools we have for examining man’s demonstrated actions, irrespective of his self-reporting. Unfortunately, most philosophy, unlike history, law, and economics, but very much like literature, surveys and polls, consists of self-reporting.

    There are a few of us who conduct investigations into sentient(epistemic) and cooperative(ethical and political and martial) sciences, in an attempt to suggest how we might alter conceptual ‘institutions’ (objects, relations, properties, and the explanatory narratives, frames, and loadings), normative insitutions (values, manners, ethics, morals, goals, and decidability), informal institutions (religion, myth, and ritual), and formal institutions (money, ccredit, banking, contract, law, political systems, military systems, territorial systems).

    The difference in how different philosophers do this work, like heroic, virtue, rule, and outcome ethics, determined by the amout of knowledge of moral literature, history, law, economics, physical science, and the fine arts, that we have collected.

    It is easier now than in the past to possess information across that breadth of topics – but it is still extremely difficult to conduct a research program across that many disciplines.

    But that is what it takes to reorganize conceptual, normative, informal, and formal institutions by scientific rather than wishful, or dreamlike means;

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 08:09:00 UTC

  • And if you understood the +/- of density that would make sense to you

    And if you understood the +/- of density that would make sense to you.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 06:50:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796606012107198464

    Reply addressees: @mmlvia

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796550695667298304


    IN REPLY TO:

    @mmlvia

    @curtdoolittle Stupidest argument I’ve heard. Every citizen has an equal right to vote. Besides, virtually all Americans are immigrants.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796550695667298304

  • ‘Educated’ refers to a STEM degree.Paying for indulgences in the pseudosciences

    ‘Educated’ refers to a STEM degree.Paying for indulgences in the pseudosciences doesn’t make one educated. Practicing a craft does.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:13:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796460837560950784

    Reply addressees: @jfotogo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796458608368189444


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796458608368189444

  • I wonder. What’s the cost of teaching the pseudoscience of Critical Theory to th

    I wonder. What’s the cost of teaching the pseudoscience of Critical Theory to the country over the past generations?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 21:01:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796457736380841986

    Reply addressees: @ezlusztig

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796410940308602881


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796410940308602881

  • THE ASSEMBLY LINE OF FRAUD The Marxists Manufacturing Pseudoscience. … The Fra

    THE ASSEMBLY LINE OF FRAUD

    The Marxists Manufacturing Pseudoscience.

    … The Frankfurt School manufacturing Propaganda;

    … … The Academy Selling Diplomas as Class Indulgences;

    … … … Mass Market Consumer Media selling Advertising;

    … … … … The Majoritarian Democratic State selling Rents:

    … … … … … Emancipated but Unregulated Women’s Urges;

    … … … … … … The Assembly Line of Pseudoscientific Fraud.

    (h/t:Rakesh Sahgal, for the inspiration)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:53:00 UTC

  • THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW

    THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW, AND INSTITUTIONS, TO AMELIORATE THE SUICIDAL URGES OF WOMEN.

    There are good and bad people in every clan, tribe, and race. Some have just been better that others at eliminating different kinds of bad.

    Whites have notably been TERRIBLE at eliminating the bad trait of FEMALE SOLIPSISM or developing laws to limit its damage, before granting women the franchise with which to express their need to care for children upon non-kin and competitors.

    Women, demonstrably, and empirically, are mentally unable to vote unless married with children, so that their ‘urges’ are occupied at home, and not expressed as inappropriate urges in the commons.

    Men have these urges: sex, violence, and risk. But we have spent millennia, constraining the danger of those urges through domestication and institutional evolution.

    We have not spent the same time constraining women. And it’s more than obvious that we must do so. Since their urges, expressed in the voting booth, direct their nest and nurture instincts outside of the home, and to provide access, comfort, and resources to what are evidentially our competitors and enemies.

    WE BLAME THE COMPETITOR NOT OUR WOMEN, AND NOT OURSELVES.

    Is it true that the cosmopolitan jews, in all their forms, but in particular, their new religion of Cultural Marxism and the Scripture of Critical Theory, and the Fictitious History of Marxism, had found willing soil in our young, unmarried women? Yes. Is it true that the Academy, freshly licensed by Darwin’s defeat of the Church, but whose revolution in science limited the Academy’s market, seized upon this new intellectual product as a means of profiting from the postwar underclass, and newly enriched women,

    A woman over the age of 21 that does not have at least one child is a threat to civilization because she cannot control her urges for nesting, consumption, and the IRRESPONSIBLE satisfaction of her urges for caretaking by employing them against the interests of kin.

    That’s not an opinion but a statement of the empirical evidence of the experiments of the various societies in the 20th century.

    So there are many ways of controlling the impulses of women without children to harm the polity and our kin. The most obvious being to deprive them of the vote until they are able to manage their urges. Just as we deprive men of their ability to vote if they cannot manage their urges. The difference is only that men require physical restraint, and women require verbal and political restraint.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:33:00 UTC

  • MAKE DISTRIBUTION OF PSEUDOSCIENCE ILLEGAL 1) Defund and deny loans to universit

    MAKE DISTRIBUTION OF PSEUDOSCIENCE ILLEGAL

    1) Defund and deny loans to universities, colleges, or schools that teach Critical Theory, Marxism, or their derivatives, as a pseudoscientific religion. (Put left universities out of business)

    2) Require warranty of truthfulness, and warranty of due diligence, and warranty that one’s speech is not a hazard to voluntary exchange when speaking into the informational commons. (put the news industry out of business)

    3) Grant universal standing under the same criteria as to racketeering to the public in matters of defense of the informational commons


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 10:38:00 UTC

  • YES, IT APPEARS THAT WE NEEDED TO INVENT PROGRAMMING IN ORDER TO SOLVE THE PROBL

    YES, IT APPEARS THAT WE NEEDED TO INVENT PROGRAMMING IN ORDER TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES.

    —“Such clarity! Why has it taken this long for man to state this? Did we really need computers to tell truth this lucidly?”— Frank Leibowitz

    Excellent Question

    Actually, we needed strictly constructed law, and we discovered to strictly constructed programming first – it seems – by accident.

    The difference is that in the discipline of programming, the test of computability is stricter than in the discipline of law’s test of existential possibility.

    And that the range of problems we test for with computability is broader than the range of programs we test with law.

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 11:11:00 UTC

  • Psychology is a pseudoscience and all psychologism a use of it to commit a fraud

    Psychology is a pseudoscience and all psychologism a use of it to commit a fraud. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 04:42:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795124225187184640

    Reply addressees: @ogiesoro @LilDocCollins @Bgiant1Bob @nsa @CIA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795094788659933184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/795094788659933184

  • Name-calling is the practice of attributing properties by analogy. Description o

    Name-calling is the practice of attributing properties by analogy. Description of demonstrable properties is simply “science”.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-03 23:05:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794314510169411584

    Reply addressees: @NorthBayTeky

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794313433835417600


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NorthBayTeky

    Of course the name calling makes you such a paragon of intelligence https://t.co/oqyb7g4WwN

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/794313433835417600