If you speak, display, and act in Testimonial Truth, then what is the difference between a Religion, a Philosophy, a Logic, a Science, and a Testimony?
A Religion consists of a commitment. A Philosophy a Preference. A Logic and a Science extensions of perception, and Testimony a warranty of due diligence.
But then, what is the difference between a Religion of Natural Law ( transcendence, beauty, excellence, truth, agency, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets ) and a Philosophy of natural law, a logic of natural law, the science of natural law, and the testimony under natural law?
Well, I don’t see any difference other than that a religion requires a group, an oath, a ritual (cost), a mythos, and the institutional means of intergenerational persistence. Conversely, without a religion what is one’s contractual commitment to others of adherence to natural law? Without others who insures your adherence to natural law in word, display and deed?
An intellectual movement, a political movement, and a religious movement, are normatively and legally bound in the current era.
One does not debate one’s religion. One merely refuses the alternatives to it.
Therein lies our answer.
😉
Theme: Science
-
IMPORTANT QUESTION: If you speak, display, and act in Testimonial Truth, then wh
IMPORTANT QUESTION:
If you speak, display, and act in Testimonial Truth, then what is the difference between a Religion, a Philosophy, a Logic, a Science, and a Testimony?
A Religion consists of a commitment. A Philosophy a Preference. A Logic and a Science extensions of perception, and Testimony a warranty of due diligence.
But then, what is the difference between a Religion of Natural Law ( transcendence, beauty, excellence, truth, agency, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets ) and a Philosophy of natural law, a logic of natural law, the science of natural law, and the testimony under natural law?
Well, I don’t see any difference other than that a religion requires a group, an oath, a ritual (cost), a mythos, and the institutional means of intergenerational persistence. Conversely, without a religion what is one’s contractual commitment to others of adherence to natural law? Without others who insures your adherence to natural law in word, display and deed?
An intellectual movement, a political movement, and a religious movement, are normatively and legally bound in the current era.
One does not debate one’s religion. One merely refuses the alternatives to it.
Therein lies our answer.
😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-10 19:40:00 UTC
-
Important Question:
If you speak, display, and act in Testimonial Truth, then what is the difference between a Religion, a Philosophy, a Logic, a Science, and a Testimony? A Religion consists of a commitment. A Philosophy a Preference. A Logic and a Science extensions of perception, and Testimony a warranty of due diligence. But then, what is the difference between a Religion of Natural Law ( transcendence, beauty, excellence, truth, agency, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets ) and a Philosophy of natural law, a logic of natural law, the science of natural law, and the testimony under natural law? Well, I don’t see any difference other than that a religion requires a group, an oath, a ritual (cost), a mythos, and the institutional means of intergenerational persistence. Conversely, without a religion what is one’s contractual commitment to others of adherence to natural law? Without others who insures your adherence to natural law in word, display and deed? An intellectual movement, a political movement, and a religious movement, are normatively and legally bound in the current era. One does not debate one’s religion. One merely refuses the alternatives to it. Therein lies our answer. 😉 -
@jordanbpeterson Postmodernism <-Marxism <-Abrahamism <-Pilpul <-Wisdom Literatu
@jordanbpeterson Postmodernism <-Marxism <-Abrahamism <-Pilpul <-Wisdom Literature vs. Science <-Reason <-Common Law <-Testimony to Peers.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-10 14:42:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/917762246255828993
-
Just because mathematics is constructed for scale independence, does not mean an
Just because mathematics is constructed for scale independence, does not mean any theory that corresponds to reality can be true without limit. Mathematics is only scale independent in measurement, there is nothing we can find in the universe that is scale independent for mathematics to measure. -
Just because mathematics is constructed for scale independence, does not mean an
Just because mathematics is constructed for scale independence, does not mean any theory that corresponds to reality can be true without limit. Mathematics is only scale independent in measurement, there is nothing we can find in the universe that is scale independent for mathematics to measure.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-10 12:41:00 UTC
-
Just because mathematics is constructed for scale independence, does not mean an
Just because mathematics is constructed for scale independence, does not mean any theory that corresponds to reality can be true without limit. Mathematics is only scale independent in measurement, there is nothing we can find in the universe that is scale independent for mathematics to measure. -
“Occam’s razor is racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic.”—Ross L
—-“Occam’s razor is racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic.”—Ross Lampers Um. Evolution doesn’t have a choice but to practice Occam’s Razor. It doesn’t have the choice to waste energy. -
“Occam’s razor is racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic.”—Ross L
—-“Occam’s razor is racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic.”—Ross Lampers
Um. Evolution doesn’t have a choice but to practice Occam’s Razor. It doesn’t have the choice to waste energy.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-07 13:31:00 UTC
-
“Occam’s razor is racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic.”—Ross L
—-“Occam’s razor is racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic, transphobic.”—Ross Lampers Um. Evolution doesn’t have a choice but to practice Occam’s Razor. It doesn’t have the choice to waste energy.