Theme: Science

  • HOW TO CUT GRANITE AT SCALE Quite easily. I’m trained in sculpture so these thin

    HOW TO CUT GRANITE AT SCALE
    Quite easily. I’m trained in sculpture so these things are easily understood. They just take a lot of human time and effort. Even cutting the top of that stone is easy with oil, water, copper or copper-alloy wire or even chain (more easily repaird), ground aggregates, tar, a wheel, a bunch of men to manage each little bit of the process, and time. We do the same thing today in a tiny fraction of time with more advanced metals and machine power, but it’s still the same process.

    4500 years later we’re doing the exact same thing:
    https://t.co/RuXxhbxK3v
    It’s just faster and takes fewer men to do the work (even if the same or more men if we include the manufacture of the cutting materials).

    Reply addressees: @plushpete


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:46:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720542907239661568

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720537191464493358

  • Both the former and the latter claimed they were making scientific statements. T

    Both the former and the latter claimed they were making scientific statements. The most humorous is the neoMarxist frankfurt school what literally, knowingly, ‘made it all up’.

    A student of group strategies and thier frameworks of logic will become rapidly aware of the semitic use of mythicism vs the european use of historicism. Why? Social cosntruction of falsehoods vs social construction of truths.

    Why is it that the feminine mind or the feminine group strategy requires social construction of falsehoods?

    That’s a fascinating question but we already know the answer.

    Responsibility.

    Reply addressees: @ratfacedmouse @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:31:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720539303090982912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720537444771062144

  • Yuval Harrari is wrong about almost everything because he is advancing an agenda

    Yuval Harrari is wrong about almost everything because he is advancing an agenda (just as did Diamond, Zinn, Gould, Lewontin, Boaz, Freud) and just as did the entirety of the frankfurt school, neomarxists and postmodernists. It’s largely a denial of Darwin as a general rule of all existence not just biology. We know why (Feminine cognition), and we know why most of this pseudoscience is produced by the Ashkenazim (feminine bias in cognition). The oddity is only in why are we tolerant of this pseudoscience? (it’s cultural)

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:18:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720535878118821888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720526925901320453

  • NO OTHER BRANCH OF SCIENCE RELIES ON SO MANY DIFFERENT SUBJECTS When we say that

    NO OTHER BRANCH OF SCIENCE RELIES ON SO MANY DIFFERENT SUBJECTS
    When we say that “The Work” consists of the unification of the sciences by a universally commensurable constructive logic of first principles (laws), the consequences are not obvious that this means we work in every… https://twitter.com/SaitouHajime00/status/1720532770483789872


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 20:12:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720534443301994863

  • ALex, You are not very good at this. 1. As far as we know, all knowledge is the

    ALex,
    You are not very good at this.
    1. As far as we know, all knowledge is the result of experience. And I don’t know of anyone who undersetands the neuroscience in this matter better than I do.
    2. Metaphysical presumptions are only truth if they are consistent and correspondent with physical truths.
    3. Otherwise they are not truths they are biases or preferences.
    4. We discover gradual improvements of our knowledge of pramatic truth toward ideal truth by adversarial competition (observation, listening, discussion, debate, argument, suit, and trial and error) – not by reason alone, or by individual presumption or supernatural cause. But by observation of success and failure.

    Instead, what you mean is that we can construct narratives and try to live inside those narratives to compensate for our lack of knowledge (ignoranc) and ability (competency) and mindfulness (ability to suppress neuroticism) as populations increase, the division of knowledge and labor increases, and we are possessed of less and less knowledge of the world around us, less agency in it, greater dependence upon it, and greater alienation from one another within it – stoking neuroticism that generates demand for such comforting (theraputic) narratives.

    Reply addressees: @AleMartnezR1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 17:08:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720488219198775296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717729642264588548

  • “It’s crazy to think the Egyptians carved on granite thousands of years ago”– N

    –“It’s crazy to think the Egyptians carved on granite thousands of years ago”–

    Not when you understand what harder rocks, heat, sand, and acid do to rock. 😉

    If you learn to sculpt it will include a pointed chisel and a rake chisel. a very hard rock on a slightly softer rock (granite) will produce small predictable indentations just like a pointed steel chisel. A steel, iron, bronze, copper alloy, copper, or rock chisel differ only in the size and rate of removal. On the other hand it’s actually easier and takes less skill to just have a rock hammer with a rounded and not overly large end, on the end of a handle to just rapidly tap divots into the stone. And because you’re taking off consistent bits of stone (pulverizing it really), from a consistent material, it’s relatively eays and NOT difficult. it’s just time consuming and the ancient egyptians had food and population and time. 😉

    If you want to pull stone from a quarry, you just build little fires and then hit it with a rock and you pull out regular but larger segments of stone.

    If you want to drill a hole in stone you create a bronze or copper sheet, fold it into a round tube, pour in sand (or a tiny aggregate of a harder stone) and water, (or oil) and then use a rope back and fort to drill. It takes three or five men but it’s not complicated, and it’s a lot faster than you’d think.

    If you want to finish stone you can use both sand ‘sand leather or sand cloth’. And if you happen to have access to a mine where acids form, you can use that too (south american in particular).

    We forget sometimes these people were just coming out of the stone age and their undestanding of rock was culturally deep.

    Just as contemporary art is largely sh*t because we can’t afford to put time into it – ancient art is great because EMPIRES could afford to put human time and effort into it.

    It really is that simple.

    ps: What’s older? The pyramids or stonehenge? Stonehenge is older than the pyramids. Stonehenge was erected around 3100 BC, while the first pyramid was built around 2600 BC. Though what we see today was erected about contemporaneously with the pyramids. And gobekli tepe is much older at around 10,000BC

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle The Natural Law Institute The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 16:32:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720479050643177472

  • WHY IS MARBLE PREFERRED FOR SCULPTING – AT LEAST THE HUMAN FORM? Marble has been

    WHY IS MARBLE PREFERRED FOR SCULPTING – AT LEAST THE HUMAN FORM?

    Marble has been the preferred material for stone monumental sculpture since ancient times, with several advantages over its more common geological “parent” limestone. Here are some reasons why marble is preferred by sculptors:
    Translucency: Among the commonly available stones, only marble has a slight translucency i.e. subsurface scattering that is comparable to that of human skin.
    Texture and Sheen: The sheen and texture of marble are unmatched by other stones, making it an ideal choice for creating sculptures.
    Grain Fineness: The fineness of marble’s grain enables the sculptor to render minute detail in a manner not always possible with limestone1.
    Workability: Some types of marble also have the advantage that, when first quarried, it is relatively soft and easy to work, refine, and polish. As the finished marble ages, it becomes harder and more durable.
    Hardness and Compressive Strength: Marble has a high level of hardness and compressive strength, making it ideal for sculpting.
    Durability: Marble is resistant to weathering and decay, making it an ideal material for outdoor sculptures that must withstand the elements.

    RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIMESTONE AND MARBLE
    The minerals in limestone are cemented together by natural processes, while marble is a result of metamorphism which recrystallizes the calcite and dolomite.
    Formation: Limestone is a sedimentary rock, typically composed of calcium carbonate fossils (shells and skeletons). When sedimentary limestone is compressed through rock-forming processes under extreme heat, marble is formed by the recrystallised grains.
    Metamorphism: Marble is a metamorphic rock formed by the alteration of limestone by heat and pressure. The calcite in the limestone changes and fossils and layering in the original limestone disappear as interlocking grains grow. If the limestone is pure, a white marble is formed.
    Recrystallization: The recrystallization process results in smaller grains and increases the overall strength of the marble.

    Reply addressees: @OtonielFilho5 @FlashGorgone


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-03 16:03:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720471783910895616

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720464328833269970

  • It means there is no evidence at any scale on non determinism, and no evidence t

    It means there is no evidence at any scale on non determinism, and no evidence that we can’t explain everything if we can’t make an observation. As such I can testify that we would need some evidence of indeterminism to fail to explain everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 20:33:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719814836324806890

    Reply addressees: @HakunaMateria

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719812483886785012

  • It can because there is no evidence of any non deterministic phenomenon (not har

    It can because there is no evidence of any non deterministic phenomenon (not hard determinism) in the universe. As such all patterns can be reduced to some sort of expression whether it is continous such as mathematics and physics, computational (branching), or simulational (adversarial). There is nothing that is regular that we have found that we cannot reduce if we can observe it. The only things we currently are unsure of are those things we cannot observe at the very large or vary small. We are even encroaching on protiens which as biological machines are the most complex molecules we’ve yet discovered.

    Reply addressees: @HakunaMateria


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 20:12:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719809638730752000

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719808825337974846

  • You’re wrong. In fact, the universe is so simple it’s intellectually insulting.

    You’re wrong. In fact, the universe is so simple it’s intellectually insulting. I’m not arrogant enough to assert that there are turtles all the way down so to speak.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 20:00:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719806521163272204

    Reply addressees: @HakunaMateria

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719800151446044717