Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • Marxism, Socialism, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernism are categorical names we

    Marxism, Socialism, Cultural Marxism and Postmodernism are categorical names we give to pseudoscientific intellectual movements that arose in response to Maxwell, Darwin, Menger, Spencer, and Nietzsche. They’re just Abrahamism (Judaism/Christinity/Islam) in pseudoscientific prose

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 22:05:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974768599771570176

    Reply addressees: @npdrifter @TorontoStar

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974764957316214784

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable ā€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974764957316214784

  • I don’t know about that but it is probably the only self help book that is not a

    I don’t know about that but it is probably the only self help book that is not a total waste of time. Peterson is – knowingly or not – reconstructing stoicism in scientific prose.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 22:02:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974767976581947394

    Reply addressees: @cis_van_zee @jordanbpeterson @EthanVanSciver

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973373642468859905

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable ā€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973373642468859905

  • Apparently you don’t know the difference between Psychology (cognitive biases),

    Apparently you don’t know the difference between Psychology (cognitive biases), ‘Demonstrated Preference’ and Bias (Truth vs Reporting), and Psychologism (pseudoscientific name calling). šŸ˜‰ BTW: Superiority is demonstrable everywhere in nature by results of competition by action.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 21:38:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974761867854991362

    Reply addressees: @Jory_Nal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970689939238260737

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Jory_Nal

    This thesis makes #Nazis upset.

    Clearly worth reading then.

    For the idiot #JordanBPeterson Iā€™d note that #narcissism is to REFUSE to preface your view with its biases, FAILING to see conflations in view as privelege, and pretending to objectivity as one spouts idiosyncracy. https://t.co/OeXFC7jRmU

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/970689939238260737

  • You know how a reasonably smart person hears a theological argument and understa

    You know how a reasonably smart person hears a theological argument and understands its ridiculous? Or how a scientist hears a rationalist argument and understands it’s ridiculous?”Testimonialists” understand most speech is just as ridiculous. And it’s humbling – and a bit scary.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 19:27:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974728778067869697

  • Kill All The Pseudoscientists, And Philosophers, Theologians? šŸ˜‰

    The philosophy of Marx, Lenin, and Mao (version two) cost >100M lives and the World wars, as well as that of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (version one) cost > 500M lives (islam), the destruction of the four great civilizations of the ancient world(islam), and a 1500 year dark age (christianity and islam). And that’s before we even start thinking about all the others. The damage Kant did alone to german thought (Rousseau > Kant > Continental Philosophy > Marxism > Postmodernism) is certainly as damaging as version one (judaism, christianity, islam). Why are the idealists, utopians, and theologians all writers who cause deaths by the excitement to suicide of millions? Philosophy in its forms of pseudohistory, pseudoscience, pseudorationalism, and occult, has done more damage than anything other than malaria, smallpox, and the great plagues. I mean, by this measure, we should kill everyone who speaks in fictionalisms: pseudoscience, rationalism, utopianism, supernaturalism. It might be the single best improvement in mankind since the invention of antibiotics.

  • KILL ALL THE PSEUDOSCIENTISTS, AND PHILOSOPHERS, THEOLOGIANS? šŸ˜‰ The philosophy

    KILL ALL THE PSEUDOSCIENTISTS, AND PHILOSOPHERS, THEOLOGIANS? šŸ˜‰

    The philosophy of Marx, Lenin, and Mao (version two) cost >100M lives and the World wars, as well as that of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (version one) cost > 500M lives (islam), the destruction of the four great civilizations of the ancient world(islam), and a 1500 year dark age (christianity and islam).

    And that’s before we even start thinking about all the others. The damage Kant did alone to german thought (Rousseau > Kant > Continental Philosophy > Marxism > Postmodernism) is certainly as damaging as version one (judaism, christianity, islam).

    Why are the idealists, utopians, and theologians all writers who cause deaths by the excitement to suicide of millions?

    Philosophy in its forms of pseudohistory, pseudoscience, pseudorationalism, and occult, has done more damage than anything other than malaria, smallpox, and the great plagues.

    I mean, by this measure, we should kill everyone who speaks in fictionalisms: pseudoscience, rationalism, utopianism, supernaturalism.

    It might be the single best improvement in mankind since the invention of antibiotics.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:40:00 UTC

  • Kill All The Pseudoscientists, And Philosophers, Theologians? šŸ˜‰

    The philosophy of Marx, Lenin, and Mao (version two) cost >100M lives and the World wars, as well as that of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (version one) cost > 500M lives (islam), the destruction of the four great civilizations of the ancient world(islam), and a 1500 year dark age (christianity and islam). And that’s before we even start thinking about all the others. The damage Kant did alone to german thought (Rousseau > Kant > Continental Philosophy > Marxism > Postmodernism) is certainly as damaging as version one (judaism, christianity, islam). Why are the idealists, utopians, and theologians all writers who cause deaths by the excitement to suicide of millions? Philosophy in its forms of pseudohistory, pseudoscience, pseudorationalism, and occult, has done more damage than anything other than malaria, smallpox, and the great plagues. I mean, by this measure, we should kill everyone who speaks in fictionalisms: pseudoscience, rationalism, utopianism, supernaturalism. It might be the single best improvement in mankind since the invention of antibiotics.

  • BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy

    BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy is limited to the determination of personal choice, and interpersonal good. And that is probably all that is left for philosophers to judge. Truth is now in the domain of science – as it should have been all along.

  • BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy

    BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy is limited to the determination of personal choice, and interpersonal good. And that is probably all that is left for philosophers to judge.

    Truth is now in the domain of science – as it should have been all along.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-16 13:29:00 UTC

  • BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy

    BTW, I do science(testimony) and law(Decidability). As far as I know, philosophy is limited to the determination of personal choice, and interpersonal good. And that is probably all that is left for philosophers to judge. Truth is now in the domain of science – as it should have been all along.