Theme: Science

  • What Is A Term Or Phrase That Describes A Civilization That Is Open Minded About Philosophical And Metaphysical Concepts, Rarely Abuses Science For Political Or Industrial Goals, And Values Fine Craftsmanship More Than Marketing Or Celebrities?

    “Wealthy Enough To Practice Folly”

    That’s actually the answer.

    I debated a famous communist painter back in the 80’s.

    He was angry when I explained to him that every work of art he’d mentioned was the product of an expansionary empire that practiced slavery, serfdom, and suppression of local custom in order to increase general wealth by increasing the opportunity for commerce.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-term-or-phrase-that-describes-a-civilization-that-is-open-minded-about-philosophical-and-metaphysical-concepts-rarely-abuses-science-for-political-or-industrial-goals-and-values-fine-craftsmanship-more

  • What Is Your Personal Philosophy As It Relates To Ethics And Metaphysics? Why?

    This is not so much a philosophy as the results of science that I can no longer deny, and so I live according to the science – in large part because it is advantageous.

    1. We are an expensive life form. Particularly our brains.
    2. We must acquire, and we acquire at cost to ourselves.
    3. All our emotions are nothing but reflections in state of that which we plan to, are in the process of, or have acquired an interest.
    4. Cooperation is logarithmically more productive than any action an individual can take, and therefore we must cooperate to survive. (Possibly as much as ten thousand times as productive.)
    5. People are purely rational, not moral or immoral but amoral: they cheat and try to acquire disproportionately from cooperation, they free ride, steal from, and prey upon others. This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment of cheaters in all walks of life, even at high personal cost: to prevent defectors from cheating.
    6. The optimum algorithm (really) for developing cooperation is to exhaust every opportunity for cooperation even from cheaters. They almost always come around, because it is always an advantage to come around. This was the entire message of christianity which was lost in the dogma. But it’s just science.
    7. All our speech is merely a dance of negotiation so that we may create opportunities to acquire, do acquire, or preserve what we acquire. All of it is just signaling.
    8. We are entirely incognizant of these behaviors because it is evolutionarily disadvantageous for us to be intuitively honest, honest with ourselves, and honest with others. This is the same reason we have many cognitive, social, and probabilistic biases in our genes. To keep us going when evidence would overwhelm us.
    9. Most of the joy in life is playing this set of word games, cooperative games, and acquisition games with others so that we all acquire what we want as best we can without making others avoid us so that we can’t acquire what we want and need. This is why people commit suicide when they are lonely, and do not commit suicide when they are not.
    10. Therefor the only rule of cooperation, of morality, and of law, is reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary cooperation with each other, and the only immoral actions are those that violate that moral rule by free riding, parasitism, theft, or predation. And that is why reciprocity is the basis of all traditional laws (and why it is not the basis of legislation).

    This little list is the answer to nearly all of metaphysics, epistemology, psychology, sociology, ethics, and politics.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-personal-philosophy-as-it-relates-to-ethics-and-metaphysics-Why

  • How Does The Level Of Genetic Similarity Compare Between Human Races And Between Dog Breeds?

    This is a question that demonstrates a misunderstanding of the function of genes.

    You can’t measure genetic distance by comparison of the genome but by comparison of the consequences produced by the combinations of genes over time.

    In other words a single change may cause a disease, a small number of changes may produce profound consequences (such as variation in testosterone), and many many changes may cancel each other out, or must be required to operate in sequence to produce visible consequences (intelligence).

    Humans are ‘grown’ not ‘manufactured’. Most of our variation occurs during the process of growth in utero in particular, then as we mature. Most variations occur because of different rates of growth and inhibitors.

    Humans sort by visible and perceptible value to one another. Most of the time by reproductive and associative fitness. Hence low rotation of the classes.

    Our classes and castes are equivalent to various dog breeds.

    https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-level-of-genetic-similarity-compare-between-human-races-and-between-dog-breeds

  • What Is A Term Or Phrase That Describes A Civilization That Is Open Minded About Philosophical And Metaphysical Concepts, Rarely Abuses Science For Political Or Industrial Goals, And Values Fine Craftsmanship More Than Marketing Or Celebrities?

    “Wealthy Enough To Practice Folly”

    That’s actually the answer.

    I debated a famous communist painter back in the 80’s.

    He was angry when I explained to him that every work of art he’d mentioned was the product of an expansionary empire that practiced slavery, serfdom, and suppression of local custom in order to increase general wealth by increasing the opportunity for commerce.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-term-or-phrase-that-describes-a-civilization-that-is-open-minded-about-philosophical-and-metaphysical-concepts-rarely-abuses-science-for-political-or-industrial-goals-and-values-fine-craftsmanship-more

  • What Is Your Personal Philosophy As It Relates To Ethics And Metaphysics? Why?

    This is not so much a philosophy as the results of science that I can no longer deny, and so I live according to the science – in large part because it is advantageous.

    1. We are an expensive life form. Particularly our brains.
    2. We must acquire, and we acquire at cost to ourselves.
    3. All our emotions are nothing but reflections in state of that which we plan to, are in the process of, or have acquired an interest.
    4. Cooperation is logarithmically more productive than any action an individual can take, and therefore we must cooperate to survive. (Possibly as much as ten thousand times as productive.)
    5. People are purely rational, not moral or immoral but amoral: they cheat and try to acquire disproportionately from cooperation, they free ride, steal from, and prey upon others. This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment of cheaters in all walks of life, even at high personal cost: to prevent defectors from cheating.
    6. The optimum algorithm (really) for developing cooperation is to exhaust every opportunity for cooperation even from cheaters. They almost always come around, because it is always an advantage to come around. This was the entire message of christianity which was lost in the dogma. But it’s just science.
    7. All our speech is merely a dance of negotiation so that we may create opportunities to acquire, do acquire, or preserve what we acquire. All of it is just signaling.
    8. We are entirely incognizant of these behaviors because it is evolutionarily disadvantageous for us to be intuitively honest, honest with ourselves, and honest with others. This is the same reason we have many cognitive, social, and probabilistic biases in our genes. To keep us going when evidence would overwhelm us.
    9. Most of the joy in life is playing this set of word games, cooperative games, and acquisition games with others so that we all acquire what we want as best we can without making others avoid us so that we can’t acquire what we want and need. This is why people commit suicide when they are lonely, and do not commit suicide when they are not.
    10. Therefor the only rule of cooperation, of morality, and of law, is reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary cooperation with each other, and the only immoral actions are those that violate that moral rule by free riding, parasitism, theft, or predation. And that is why reciprocity is the basis of all traditional laws (and why it is not the basis of legislation).

    This little list is the answer to nearly all of metaphysics, epistemology, psychology, sociology, ethics, and politics.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-personal-philosophy-as-it-relates-to-ethics-and-metaphysics-Why

  • Truth is truth by the way, reciprocity is reciprocity, and while it may seem dif

    Truth is truth by the way, reciprocity is reciprocity, and while it may seem difficult to you, distinguishing science from every other form of falsehood is pretty simple. That’s why science is the universal language of truth. Everything else isn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:56:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975022972930052096

    Reply addressees: @JacobtCroft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975017310908948482


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975017310908948482

  • 4 – Every thinker is only partly right. My beef with rothbard is that he conflat

    4 – Every thinker is only partly right. My beef with rothbard is that he conflated low trust ethics with high trust ethics, and conducted an pseudoscientific war on the commons as marx did on private property. The only one who was right was Hayek: it’s all just reducible to law.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:50:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975021495566159873

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049

  • 3 – My reading (because I learned it from him) is that Hoppe completed that prog

    3 – My reading (because I learned it from him) is that Hoppe completed that program, unfortunately, using Kantian > Marxist rationalism, rather than anglo empiricism (law). I just converted it to scientific rather than justificationary prose.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:48:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975021080980197376

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049

  • (Respectfully) I always think that’s a rather ridiculous question since of empir

    (Respectfully) I always think that’s a rather ridiculous question since of empiricism (Aristotle), Self Improvement(Zeno), Moral Literature (Plato), and Rational Mythology (Augustine), it’s easy to state that all of philosophy is merely footnotes stated in current vocabulary.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:44:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975020055401586689

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018569451778049

  • Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at

    Yet those who had a direct connection to rothbard or rand are still grasping at straws of rationalist falsehood. Science is complete. Philosophy is relegated to preference and good. And justification went the way of scripture. Just how it is. They only got it half right.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-17 14:38:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975018658945748993

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon @FriedrichHayek

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974794304769200134


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BobMurphyEcon

    @curtdoolittle @FriedrichHayek What are you talking about? Mises talks e.g. about building a railroad connecting two points, and how the planner can’t know which route is most economical.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974794304769200134