—Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aimed at better understanding the Jewish bias in Nobel awards.—by Lisa Outhwaite https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_Prize Yes, lisa, and I think most of us know this. “Heaping of Undue Praise” and “Activist Nepotism”. A high school clique popularity context. –‘It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting. ‘— —‘Networking behind the J-bias When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. ‘—
Theme: Science
-
J-Bias in Nobel Prizes
—Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aimed at better understanding the Jewish bias in Nobel awards.—by Lisa Outhwaite https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_Prize Yes, lisa, and I think most of us know this. “Heaping of Undue Praise” and “Activist Nepotism”. A high school clique popularity context. –‘It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting. ‘— —‘Networking behind the J-bias When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. ‘—
-
ROMANTICISM (our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attac
ROMANTICISM
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science)
–Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287184791878418&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 14:22:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033721347388723202
-
ROMANTICISM (our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attac
ROMANTICISM
(our attempt at restoration of tradition, before the abrahamic attack on history and science)
–Paganism resurfaces as a topic of fascination in 18th to 19th-century Romanticism, in particular in the context of the literary Celtic and Viking revivals, which portrayed historical Celtic and Germanic polytheists as noble savages.
The 19th century also saw much scholarly interest in the reconstruction of pagan mythology from folklore or fairy tales. This was notably attempted by the Brothers Grimm, especially Jacob Grimm in his Teutonic Mythology, and Elias Lönnrot with the compilation of the Kalevala. The work of the Brothers Grimm influenced other collectors, both inspiring them to collect tales and leading them to similarly believe that the fairy tales of a country were particularly representative of it, to the neglect of cross-cultural influence. Among those influenced were the Russian Alexander Afanasyev, the Norwegians Peter Christen Asbjørnsen and Jørgen Moe, and the Englishman Joseph Jacobs.[67]
Romanticist interest in non-classical antiquity coincided with the rise of Romantic nationalism and the rise of the nation state in the context of the 1848 revolutions, leading to the creation of national epics and national myths for the various newly formed states. Pagan or folkloric topics were also common in the Musical nationalism of the period.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 10:22:00 UTC
-
IN NOBEL PRIZES —Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aime
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_PrizeBIAS IN NOBEL PRIZES
—Have you come across this before? It is a research paper aimed at better understanding the Jewish bias in Nobel awards.—by Lisa Outhwaite
Yes, lisa, and I think most of us know this. “Heaping of Undue Praise” and “Activist Nepotism”. A high school clique popularity context.
–‘It is expected that the national frequency of Nobel Laureates should correlate with the average National IQ, but this is not the case. However, the literary production of a country correlates significantly with the frequency of laureates in that country (Figure 3 insert). The number of granted patents correlates significantly with the national IQ, but not with the number of Nobel laureates. The size of the Jewish population in a country has no significant effect on that country’s intellectual activity, measured as National IQ, book production or patenting. ‘—
—‘Networking behind the J-bias When the policy decision has been made by the Nobel Assembly, already in February, it is up to the extended Nobel Committee (16 persons) to choose from the short list of candidates. At this stage the most important factor is the number and status of the scientists who support a particular nominee. A nominee with many or weighty supporters will probably be the finally selected one. And it is here that Jewish scientists can and do use of their talent for networking (with other Jews) and their exceptional verbal intelligence. ‘—
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229007550_The_Jewish_Bias_of_the_Nobel_PrizeUpdated Aug 26, 2018, 10:08 AM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 10:08:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40110062_287156571881240_75675331706
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40110062_287156571881240_7567533170673844224_n_287156568547907.jpg http://helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdfhttp://helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf

Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 08:48:00 UTC
-
Returns on Propertarianism will Equal Those on Empiricism
I am pretty sure that the returns on testimonialism and propertarianism will be equal to the returns on science. Meaning the net lift of scores will be on the order of a standard deviation.
-
Returns on Propertarianism will Equal Those on Empiricism
I am pretty sure that the returns on testimonialism and propertarianism will be equal to the returns on science. Meaning the net lift of scores will be on the order of a standard deviation.
-
I am pretty sure that the returns on testimonialism and propertarianism will be
I am pretty sure that the returns on testimonialism and propertarianism will be equal to the returns on science. Meaning the net lift of scores will be on the order of a standard deviation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 14:48:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033365457716297728
-
I am pretty sure that the returns on testimonialism and propertarianism will be
I am pretty sure that the returns on testimonialism and propertarianism will be equal to the returns on science. Meaning the net lift of scores will be on the order of a standard deviation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-25 10:48:00 UTC