Theme: Science

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46479393_10156787026407264_874469571

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46479393_10156787026407264_8744695719807418368_o_10156787026397264.jpg CHRIS WALLACE PANDERING TO MORONS

    You can calculate probabilities of closed systems but only price risk in open systems.Eric DykstraI find it hard to decipher when someone is pandering to morons versus when they just are a moron.Nov 18, 2018, 12:08 PMSteve PenderI’ve hated him for a long time. Classic case of media nepotism through his dad Mike.Nov 18, 2018, 12:23 PMJennifer DeanSameNov 18, 2018, 12:38 PMCurt DoolittleMike Wallace (Wallik)

    —“Wallace, whose family’s surname was originally Wallik,[2] was born on May 9, 1918, in Brookline, Massachusetts,[2] to Russian Jewish immigrant parents,[2][3] He identified as a Jew throughout his life”—Nov 18, 2018, 1:14 PMCurt DoolittleChris Wallace

    —“Wallace was born in Chicago, Illinois,[2] the son of longtime CBS 60 Minutes reporter Mike Wallace and Norma Kaphan.[4] Wallace is Jewish[5] and both his parents were Jewish.[6][7] His parents divorced when he was one year old. He grew up in a home with his mother and his stepfather, former CBS News President Bill Leonard.[8] He did not develop a relationship with his biological father until the age of 14.[9] Leonard gave him early exposure to political journalism, hiring him as an assistant to Walter Cronkite at the 1964 Republican National Convention.”—Nov 18, 2018, 1:15 PMAndrea RoyallImagine being so pathetically “jewish” that you have to steal a Scottish surname to hide your “Jewishness”.Nov 18, 2018, 1:17 PMAndrew ClaytonAndrea Royall “I didn’t steal it, goy. My Name was always Wallace.

    Help! Police! This Wallik guy is trying to steal my name!”

    *rubs hands*Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMAndrea Royallyou forgot the shekels 😉Nov 18, 2018, 2:27 PMAlex Macleodhttps://youtu.be/eB8K1jPBnwc?t=11Nov 18, 2018, 5:58 PMKarl KühlschrankName was changed from Myron Wallik to Mike Wallace.Nov 18, 2018, 8:11 PMJim LeisAnd is it just me, or has he grown sillier as he gets older? Or maybe it’s just a journalistic sign of the times.Nov 18, 2018, 10:34 PMRichard HallCould I get an example of a probability in a closed system and a priced risk in an open system?

    I don’t understand why they aren’t interchangeable.Nov 19, 2018, 3:30 PMCurt Doolittledice, roulette wheel, cards, vs stock market vs an economy.Nov 19, 2018, 4:23 PMCurt Doolittlesee ludic fallacy by talebNov 19, 2018, 4:24 PMMichael AndradeWe’re reaching levels of of course that shouldn’t be possible.Nov 19, 2018, 11:14 PMRichard HallAh I see now. Thank you.Nov 20, 2018, 3:15 PMCHRIS WALLACE PANDERING TO MORONS

    You can calculate probabilities of closed systems but only price risk in open systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 12:03:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46493645_10156787024747264_511817229

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46493645_10156787024747264_5118172295960985600_o_10156787024737264.jpg USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES

    —“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq

    (referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)

    One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.

    -hugs brother.Skye StewartThe left tests the limits capital accumulation

    The right tests the limits of capital outlayNov 18, 2018, 12:09 PMCurt Doolittleooh… quotable… well done.Nov 18, 2018, 12:29 PMBryan Nova BreySkye Stewart What does the Federal Reserve test?Nov 18, 2018, 12:48 PMMichael D. AbbottYes. id = infantile. ego = maternal. super egp = paternal. I know you don’t subscribe to these terms–but it’s a similar idea.Nov 18, 2018, 12:55 PMSkye StewartBryan Nova Brey patience?Nov 18, 2018, 1:05 PMKari Anne DorstadI don’t see myself as a women that tests the limit of Men ! It’s not my nature to do that !Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMMichael D. AbbottGood women encourage men to test each other, while remaining encouraging.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMMichael D. AbbottBut the female shadow tests men to the core.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMCurt Doolittle^really? Or are you imagining that? What do women really do? they continuously sh-t test, in every culture. Women undermine men constantly through nagging and endless seeking of acquisitions….

    Good women are in place because bad women are prevented, but that doesn’t mean women are naturally good, any more than men are naturally good. Men and women are naturally pragmatic, and we use violence and threats to force them gradually out of bad and into surviving by the good. which is quite expensive and difficult.Nov 18, 2018, 3:26 PMUSING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES

    —“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq

    (referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)

    One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.

    Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.

    -hugs brother.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 12:02:00 UTC

  • RT @SteveStuWill: Selfish genetic elements – genes that get themselves selected

    RT @SteveStuWill: Selfish genetic elements – genes that get themselves selected without boosting the organism’s fitness, or even while harm…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 00:27:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063951776750161921

  • “While the primary players in gene expression — DNA, mRNA, ribosomes, and polyme

    —“While the primary players in gene expression — DNA, mRNA, ribosomes, and polymerases — have been known since the 1950s, how they interact during the cell cycle is still unclear.

    In previous models, researchers thought that the rate of transcription (making a mRNA copy of DNA) and translation (turning mRNA into a sequence of amino acids) was limited by the amount of DNA and mRNA available in the cell.

    But the new model, combined with existing experimental data, actually suggests that ribosomes and polymerases control the levels of proteins and mRNA in the cell.”—

    ( rather obvious. took the science test it. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 18:48:00 UTC

  • ( example: more over the top confrontation from elsewhere on the web ) —“I am

    ( example: more over the top confrontation from elsewhere on the web )

    —“I am using the opportunity your sarcasm presented to stay on message. I deal with science not psychologism, moralism, or presumption of a value of others nor a debt to those who are debtors by nature – these are frauds. Either you can make an argument to reciprocal value or you cant. Since my presumption is you (collectively) are dead weight cost, that you are undesirable, costly, damaging, and disgusting – and your approval, consent, cooperation irrelevant – and that you have nothing to offer or trade. I take the position that it is preferable to separate from or conquer and decimate your political wing rather than suffer your presence. All I have done is provide the argument that moral men may do to you as they wish out of self defense. “—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 18:20:00 UTC

  • THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH (important sequence of ar

    THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH

    (important sequence of arguments)

    There are reasons why so many people in the postwar, postmodern, feminist, and underclass movements are rigid deniers of our indifference from breeding of any other domesticated animals, and the similar differences in trait expression. We know those reasons. The fact that people believe the ‘nurture’ fallacy correlates with all other similar social cognitive biases and related fallacies, because people actively select for these falsehoods because their genes encourage and force them to. Even if confronted with the overwhelming evidence that the pseudosciences of Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et all, they will admit the science but deny its application in order to defend their genetic drives. We can easily measure these differences in brain structure with female biased brains favoring this “herd-prey illusion” and male brains favoring the purely empirical “pack-hunter” bias. Evolution gave us those genetic biases for obvious reasons given the distribution of reproductive responsibilities.

    Genese do not exist in isolation, no, however:

    (a) modification of genetic disposition is endocrine and developmental it does not modify the genome

    (b) In the nature-nurture debate it’s 80% nature, and the rest adaptation to circumstances that FAVOR that nature.

    (c) Nurture can only HARM but not improve the individual

    (d) Education only falsifies tests but over time all of us grow into (form to) our genes.

    (e) The most important decision you can make for your children is who you mate with, since regression to the mean is impossible to avoid without controlled breeding (what europeans did for the past 1300 years until 1960)

    (f) This is contrary to mother’s instincts (they intuit everything through amplified perception because they must given the fragility of young, and high pre-modern child mortality rates) and contrary to the instincts of feminized males, but it is incontrovertible in the data. This amplified perception begins in puberty, and is the source of the overwhelmingly common female mental illness when women are not supplied with sufficient child rearing responsibilities in order to burden the cognitive-emotional load.

    (g) These facts are impossible for the pseudoscientists and sophists (created by Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et al) in the marxist, postmodern, feminist movements to accept because it means (correctly) that:

    i) man was not oppressed but domesticated like every other animal and plant, and that those who are on the left are still incompletely domesticated.

    ii) classes are natural reflections of necessity given the abilities of the individuals to both process information and suppress animal impulses, the most common of which is gratification-delay,

    iii) no marxist, postmodern, feminist revolution is possible because the competence structure necessary for the preservation of human standards of living cannot tolerate any other distribution than the Pareto.

    iv) the optimum possible social order requires continuation of the Truth over Face of western civilization that requires we all understand our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value (our ‘status’) is genetically determined, and that we can only create small homogenous ethnocentric polities that due to kin selection are biased to the highly redistributive. But that you are stuck with your ‘status’ at birth unless you are overwhelmingly lucky to match extreme effort with extreme luck.

    So no, Plomin tries very hard to mollify the Genetic-Denialist movement but the data is in and incontestable – Genetic determinism is what it is and we are no different from breeds of dogs, and the differences between individuals as well as groups is the same as the difference between breeds of animals, or in the case of great apes, that we are effectively as different a series of species as are bonobos and chimpanzees.

    This is totally intolerable to the feminine-marxist-postmodernist-feminist dysgenic religion of pseudoscience, sophism, and denialism, invented by boas, marx, freud, adorno, and derrida etc as a counter-revolution against Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, Maxwell, Poincare, and the second, german, scientific revolution.

    The eugenicists were right and the chinese will get there first and they will win the war – unless we end the pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit of the left cult of equality.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 13:27:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089495_10156776407482264_761308204

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46089495_10156776407482264_7613082046172233728_n_10156776407477264.jpg Jon JonathanAlso note the greated number of methylated (imprinted) genes in tournament species vs pair bonding speciesNov 13, 2018, 8:08 PMRoss LampersSize of brain: larger in childhood vs smaller as adult

    … Can someone expand on that?Nov 13, 2018, 8:12 PMJon JonathanShould be generally larger on the left and generally smaller on the right.

    The basic concept is if youre an alpha male and you only have a limited opportunity to do as much mating as possible during your tenure you want your offspring to have genes to encourage them to grow as fast as possible even at the expense of the mother’s future reproductive health. The mother on the other hand would prefer to retain her future reproductive health so females will develop genes that are only expressed when inherited by the mother to reduce fetal growth to compensate for the growth acceleration genes the males developed.

    Pair bonding species dont have as much of this going on because when the male is going to continue mating with the same female maintaining her health is in his best interest.Nov 13, 2018, 8:27 PMNick’s ReasonIt’s not an all-encompassing theory (a complete science) of human development and gene expression. There are many more confounding variables at play. However, it does serve as a general description of some of the extreme differences we see in Sexual Dimorphism.Nov 13, 2018, 8:34 PMJon JonathanI dont think its showing what you think you think its showing

    http://www.biology-pages.info/I/Imprinting.htmlNov 13, 2018, 8:39 PMNick’s ReasonI don’t know how what you have just linked me disputes my comment.Nov 13, 2018, 8:41 PMVincent HebertIf bias met science and muddied its cherry with hand selected data – this graph would be their unwanted summary child.Nov 13, 2018, 9:48 PMJennifer Deanhttps://openpsychometrics.org/tests/EQSQ.phpNov 13, 2018, 10:34 PMJames SantagataI have personally “imprinted” a few brains myself. Very cathartic.Nov 14, 2018, 7:43 AMAndrea RoyallShush….. confessions! 😉Nov 14, 2018, 8:02 AMSolomon VolodymyrHello is this the policeNov 15, 2018, 5:21 AMAndrea Royalloh James is kidding. Anyone who’s ever used a hammer for imprinting brains uses the claw side..Nov 15, 2018, 5:26 AMJames SantagataPlus, I’m right handed.Nov 15, 2018, 5:27 AMKari Anne DorstadWhere does the transsexual fit In ?Jan 7, 2019, 9:08 PMNick HeywoodI knew it!

    I’m a hermaphrodite! :)Jan 8, 2019, 4:36 AMTobias DarbyDon’t crush their skulls… We need them for the PyramidsJan 8, 2019, 5:15 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 20:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46153337_10156776338902264_367316403

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46153337_10156776338902264_3673164037081792512_o_10156776338877264.jpg Jeffrey Fogelhttps://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/males-and-females-with-autism-show-an-extreme-of-the-typical-male-mind

    Are you referencing this theory? I haven’t seen you directly reference it, but yes indirectly (idk if incidental though). Lots of data showing autism is just ‘extreme maleness’.Nov 13, 2018, 7:40 PMAndrew ClaytonI like his conclusionNov 13, 2018, 7:45 PMBarb SpurlockNov 13, 2018, 8:01 PMBradley MorganWhere is this from? I’m literally half of each. Don’t think it is all-encompassing by any means.Nov 13, 2018, 9:53 PMJennifer DeanI’m about half of each too. It’s not an either/or. And I would change “psychotic” to “psychic.”Nov 13, 2018, 10:19 PMJennifer DeanMy finger ratio is female on one hand, male on the other.Nov 13, 2018, 10:21 PMCurt DoolittleJennifer Dean unicorn.. see?Nov 13, 2018, 10:31 PMJennifer DeanBut Curt…where do the unicorns go when the packs separate from the herd? We don’t belong in either one.Nov 14, 2018, 1:56 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 19:32:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM I think you’re looking at the differences between lea

    THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM

    I think you’re looking at the differences between leaves rather than the forest. In the end, the criticism is marxism is pseudoscience, postmodernism is sophism, and feminism simply false, and that these three movements, by making false statements and impossible promises are leading people into sadness and our civilization in decline.

    I study the abrahamic > marxist > Postmodern technique of argument (false promises, pilpul (justificationary sophism) and critique (reputation destruction) as the institutionalization of the female anti social personality expression as a persuasive technique. All these are guments use the same technique. They are all false. And they all cause the damage Peterson Claims.

    So the none of the details matter – they are but different decorations on the underlying lie.

    The term Neo Marxism refers to the transition of the means of UNDERMINING (reputation destruction) from the Marxist economic to the postmodern cultural complaint. Egro, yes Abrahamists > Marxists > Postmodernists > Feminist.

    Same technique, same goal, while changing only the critique.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:53:00 UTC

  • NO. MORAL LITERATURE IS FOR DIM PEOPLE I mean, the general argument that smart p

    NO. MORAL LITERATURE IS FOR DIM PEOPLE

    I mean, the general argument that smart people study science, economics, and law and not-very-smart people study moral literature or what we call ‘continental philosophy’, and even-less-smart people study narrative literature, is simply true. There is a reason marx is only taught as fantasy moral literature, and not science, economics or law. It’s because it’s very hard to read any of this when it’s contrary to the evidence, and reducible to nothing more than a revolt against Darwin Menger Spencer and Nietzsche.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:51:00 UTC