Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • @BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 That is an inarticulate means by which to say that

    @BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 That is an inarticulate means by which to say that the paradigm by which we construct the constant relations necessary for descriptions of necessity influences subsequent deductions. That says NOTHING about the fact that by continuous recursive competition we have produce continuous increases in precision toward a single universal paradigm, and that this paradigm consists of realism, naturalism, empiricism, and operationalism.

    This is not a subject you are equipped to discuss, and it is my principal area of research….

    I can tell you with certainty that you are simply trying to preserve confidence in a set of paradigms that you feel you have understanding of, and which are sufficient for you to grasp the world at your degree of agency and therefore given your limited agency, unable to falsify.

    The scientific position on your paradigmatic condition is that you fail to seek to falsify your paradigm because you lack the agency (intelligence, personality traits, time, or character) to obtain sufficient knowledge to do so.

    So please don’t waste my time while you try to expand your reality distortion field with comforting lies, for the purpose of falsely convincing yourself of agency in this world. You don’t have it. I know you don’t Because no one with agency believes such silly things, nor tries to evangelize them to those above their ranks.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 18:41:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102441267027690259

  • Boost of @Truthist7346 @BIGSCHMOOL @curtd It’s all in your grammar. He’s made a

    Boost of @Truthist7346@BIGSCHMOOL@curtd It’s all in your grammar. He’s made a science out of how to tell when someone isn’t telling the truth (notice that’s different than a science to tell if someone IS telling the truth). So far, the results have supported the theory. Do you have an argument? Then put it forth. Otherwise, you’re a waste of time.

    “The only truths we know for certain are falsehoods. Everything that is not false is a truth candidate. This is the inverse of the fallacy of justificationism and the central insight of the sciences: the means by which we invent or grasp an idea contribute nothing to whether or not it is true or false.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-14 15:24:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102440588937486090

  • Boost of @Truthist7346 @BIGSCHMOOL @curtd Key difference here…”That said, we a

    Boost of @Truthist7346@BIGSCHMOOL@curtd

    Key difference here…”That said, we are not talking about science here.”

    Curt and propertarians are always discussing things on a scientific basis, not sophisms. Anyone that goes on babbling about Logos, in my experience, is often a petersonite or a continental. And petersonites and the continentals, like Peterson are often sophists. Even though, they’re on the “same team” as us, they’ll often counter signal accurate attacks on Christianity itself. So, this needs correction.

    “Aristotle applied the term (logos) to refer to “reasoned discourse” or “the argument” in the field of rhetoric, and considered it one of the three modes of persuasion alongside ethos and pathos.”

    Logos’s semantic use in purely relational (N-dimensions) speech can mean many things to many people (why sophists love it), but it’s deflation just simply means logic, which provides internal consistency to testimony. There are many different dimensions we can test a persons testimony for consistency in.

    The total number of these dimensions have been worked out by Curt already in the epistemology of propertarianism called testimonialim. See in image. Failing any one of these tests demonstrates speech as false (incomplete and untrue).

    Conflating Christ’s teachings with straight logic is laughable. Even more so, is the claim that it’s (logos) evolution came from Christ or that Christ’s teachings were derived from logos and then he improved upon the ideas of logos.

    That’s justificationism for your faith and a lie. No more lies. Yes, billions of people can believe in lies. The only reason Christianity became great was because the scientific extracted truths from it were compatible with natural law and there was nothing in Christianity that wasn’t already present in our civilizations prior to it besides maybe greater degrees of our expressed mercy which isn’t necessarily a good thing.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-13 20:33:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102437162309545456

  • @BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational l

    @BIGSCHMOOL That’s empirically false right? I mean, Math, Science, Operational language, Engineering, Demonstrated Preference, Reciprocity, and Legal Testimony are antidotes for lies.

    Idealism, Analogy, and Supernaturalism are just a comforting means of obscuring and justifying lying with artful sophism (abrahamic lying).

    If you can’t say it in the grammar and vocabulary of testimony (science) they you either don’t know what you’re talking about, are a purveyor of lies, or a maker of lies.

    But it’s just LYING.

    Its all just lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 18:32:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102429905737879126

  • DISAMBIGUATING SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PSEUDOSCIENCE (excerpt from the introduc

    DISAMBIGUATING SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PSEUDOSCIENCE
    (excerpt from the introduction)

    —I used the aristotelian categories from the discipline of philosophy partly to compete with, and correct the traditional discipline of philosophy, by completing the demarcation between truth (science), philosophy (choice), and the sophism and pseudoscience (error, fraud, deceit) – particularly in metaphysics – that occupies the vast majority of what passes for philosophical prose.—

    😉

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:14:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426298672610158

  • by Martin Štěpán The universe is governed by physical laws that govern interacti

    by Martin Štěpán

    The universe is governed by physical laws that govern interactions of articles. Provided quantum mechanics really is nonsense, or at least, within limits or particle formation, they are deterministic.

    An emergent property of these interactions is life (nature). Life is a process of replication and everything that derives from it (variation, competition, positive and negative selection, adaptation, hierarchies, symbiosis, supply, demand…). Interactions of replicators are governed by natural laws that are probabilistic, expressed in bell curves and pareto distributions, described by game theory.

    In this view, what Curt discovered is a specific natural law, the natural law of reciprocity which describes what criteria does an interaction have to fulfill in order to be reciprocal (symbiotic) not just between the parties involved but the entire group (no negative externality).

    The reason such interactions are preferable is due to the outsized benefits of cooperation that make us into a fitter group, better able to compete with other groups. The rule of law of reciprocity then enforces reciprocal interactions by increasing the cost of every alternative.

    Does this make sense?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:12:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426291390109091

  • (…) DISTINCT POPULATIONS Journal Reference: Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira,

    (…)
    DISTINCT POPULATIONS
    sciencedaily.com/rel…/2013/10/131008112539.
    Journal Reference: Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira, Maria Pala, Verónica Fernandes, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Sergei Rychkov, Oksana Naumova, Jiři Hatina, Scott R. Woodward, Ken Khong Eng, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Carr, Pedro Soares, Luísa Pereira, Martin B. Richards. A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages. Nature Communications, 2013; 4 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3543
    cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(10)00246-6
    Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry
    Gil Atzmon Li Hao,Itsik Pe’er
    Christopher Velez, Alexander Pearlman, Pier Francesco, Palamara, Bernice Morrow, Eitan Friedman, Carole Oddoux
    Edward Burns, Harry Ostrer
    2010DOI:doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.015

    MOST EUROPEAN WOMEN TAKEN BY JEWISH MEN WERE ITALIAN
    Substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages
    Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira, Maria Pala, Verónica Fernandes, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Sergei Rychkov, Oksana Naumova, Jiři Hatina, Scott R. Woodward, Ken Khong Eng, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Carr, Pedro Soares, Luísa Pereira & Martin B. Richards
    Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 2543 (2013) | Download Citation
    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:05:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426260226428141

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426254044398253

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (…) Here we use high-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewish Diaspora communities and compare these patterns of genome-wide diversity with those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations, of which 25 have not previously been reported. These samples were carefully chosen to provide comprehensive comparisons between Jewish and non-Jewish populations in the Diaspora, as well as with non-Jewish populations from the Middle East and north Africa. Principal component and structure-like analyses identify previously unrecognized genetic substructure within the Middle East. Most Jewish samples form a remarkably tight subcluster that overlies Druze and Cypriot samples but not samples from other Levantine populations or paired Diaspora host populations. In contrast, Ethiopian Jews (Beta Israel) and Indian Jews (Bene Israel and Cochini) cluster with neighbouring autochthonous populations in Ethiopia and western India, respectively, despite a clear paternal link between the Bene Israel and the Levant. These results cast light on the variegated genetic architecture of the Middle East, and trace the origins of most Jewish Diaspora communities to the Levant. (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426254044398253

  • (…) Here we use high-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewis

    (…)
    Here we use high-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewish Diaspora communities and compare these patterns of genome-wide diversity with those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations, of which 25 have not previously been reported. These samples were carefully chosen to provide comprehensive comparisons between Jewish and non-Jewish populations in the Diaspora, as well as with non-Jewish populations from the Middle East and north Africa. Principal component and structure-like analyses identify previously unrecognized genetic substructure within the Middle East. Most Jewish samples form a remarkably tight subcluster that overlies Druze and Cypriot samples but not samples from other Levantine populations or paired Diaspora host populations. In contrast, Ethiopian Jews (Beta Israel) and Indian Jews (Bene Israel and Cochini) cluster with neighbouring autochthonous populations in Ethiopia and western India, respectively, despite a clear paternal link between the Bene Israel and the Levant. These results cast light on the variegated genetic architecture of the Middle East, and trace the origins of most Jewish Diaspora communities to the Levant.
    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:03:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426254044398253

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426249136889546

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NO THEY’RE NOT EUROPEAN. WTF IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? LUNATIC FRINGE…. 1. “Middle eastern populations began as the ‘marsh arabs’” 2. “Jewish origins are are indistinguishable from palestinians. ” 3. “Most (converts) women were of Italian origins (during the roman empire)” 4. “Jewish men located, married local women, and began immediately inbreeding.” 5. “Jews have been a distinct ethnic group in europe for over one thousand years” 6. “The Male Y is 50-80% levantine (even today).” ORIGINS IN ME, AND SPLIT BETWEEN LEVANTINE AND MESOPOTAMIAN(BABYLONIAN-IRANIAN) The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people Doron M. Behar, Bayazit Yunusbayev, Mait Metspalu, Ene Metspalu, Saharon Rosset, Jüri Parik, Siiri Rootsi, Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Ildus Kutuev, Guennady Yudkovsky, Elza K. Khusnutdinova, Oleg Balanovsky, Ornella Semino, Luisa Pereira, David Comas, David Gurwitz, Batsheva Bonne-Tamir, Tudor Parfitt, Michael F. Hammer, Karl Skorecki & Richard Villems Nature volume 466, pages 238–242 (08 July 2010) | Contemporary Jews comprise an aggregate of ethno-religious communities whose worldwide members identify with each other through various shared religious, historical and cultural traditions1,2. Historical evidence suggests common origins in the Middle East, followed by migrations leading to the establishment of communities of Jews in Europe, Africa and Asia, in what is termed the Jewish Diaspora3,4,5. This complex demographic history imposes special challenges in attempting to address the genetic structure of the Jewish people6. Although many genetic studies have shed light on Jewish origins and on diseases prevalent among Jewish communities, including studies focusing on uniparentally and biparentally inherited markers7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16, genome-wide patterns of variation across the vast geographic span of Jewish Diaspora communities and their respective neighbours have yet to be addressed. (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426249136889546

  • Jun 28, 2019, 4:11 PM Um. It’s not difficult. Search for any given topic. Find a

    Jun 28, 2019, 4:11 PM
    Um. It’s not difficult. Search for any given topic. Find an article in a journal or serious publication (serious). Follow the link to the article. Find the authors. Go to google scholar and find the citations of the paper or read the papers cited in the paper. Read them. Search for the authors and keywords from the abstract. Do that until all the papers make the same damned point. This doesn’t take long. Nearly all research of substance on a topic is marginally indifferent. Find a book that’s good. use the bibliography. Repeat the process. you will be current on any topic in a few hours.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:59:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426240089224846

  • @Abellonia38 Depends on if you are a supernatural or natural christian. I am a n

    @Abellonia38 Depends on if you are a supernatural or natural christian. I am a natural christian for scientific reasons. I let common folk play with the supernatural.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:57:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426231340829546