@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 That is an inarticulate means by which to say that

@BIGSCHMOOL @Nationalist7346 That is an inarticulate means by which to say that the paradigm by which we construct the constant relations necessary for descriptions of necessity influences subsequent deductions. That says NOTHING about the fact that by continuous recursive competition we have produce continuous increases in precision toward a single universal paradigm, and that this paradigm consists of realism, naturalism, empiricism, and operationalism.

This is not a subject you are equipped to discuss, and it is my principal area of research….

I can tell you with certainty that you are simply trying to preserve confidence in a set of paradigms that you feel you have understanding of, and which are sufficient for you to grasp the world at your degree of agency and therefore given your limited agency, unable to falsify.

The scientific position on your paradigmatic condition is that you fail to seek to falsify your paradigm because you lack the agency (intelligence, personality traits, time, or character) to obtain sufficient knowledge to do so.

So please don’t waste my time while you try to expand your reality distortion field with comforting lies, for the purpose of falsely convincing yourself of agency in this world. You don’t have it. I know you don’t Because no one with agency believes such silly things, nor tries to evangelize them to those above their ranks.