Theme: Science

  • A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cer

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX

    —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346

    No.

    1. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups of columns); homogenous in structure but differing in neural density by physical origin of nerves that enter them.

    2. So no it’s not fractal: the average size of a human cortex, if laid out flat would be approximately the size of a dinner napkin, and just as thick. The rest of the neocortex consists entirely of white matter (nerve fibers: axons) which connect everything to everything.

    3. With the hippocampus consolidating and organizing information, and then using rehearsal (replay) to encode episodes of memory, and thalamus controlling attention (what gets thru to the neocortex for computation, and basal ganglia that surrounds both releasing physical actions.

    4. Most of the advanced functions of the brain consist of these three ‘levers’ and the natural increase in reflection created by increasing brain size, from back (senses) to front (permuting, planning, manipulating). So the brain functions as a series of loops (operating system)

    5. That recursively process a moment of information and merge it with the next moment of information in a continuous stream which we can ‘buffer’ with a half life of just a few seconds, and no more than twenty or so. By Comparison of these moments we discern change in state.

    6. When people say the brain isn’t a computer they’re only a tiny bit right. It does operate in binary (on off) and frequency (hertz), and by competition for attention but with unimaginable numbers of connections in unimaginable parallel, in a continuous loop (OS).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:18:00 UTC

  • P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You

    P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)

    —-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter

    (That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)

    The Methodology:

    Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.

    Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.

    So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).

    Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.

    The question is only the precision of the measures.

    P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 08:31:00 UTC

  • P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You

    P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)

    —-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter

    (That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)

    The Methodology:

    Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.

    Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.

    So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).

    Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.

    The question is only the precision of the measures.

    P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 08:30:00 UTC

  • Do you have an argument? No. I think we’ve seen all you’ve got. No science, no l

    Do you have an argument? No. I think we’ve seen all you’ve got. No science, no logic, no evidence, nothing. Sorry chump. Take our your inferiority complex on someone else and waste someone else’s time. European superiority is what it is. It’s dissipating rapidly. But it’s true.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:59:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177644064642158592

    Reply addressees: @roytapel @Ozpin_88 @JohnMarkSays @NoGuiltStoic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177643699142049792


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177643699142049792

  • I do science and formal operational logic. And I prosecute liars (like you). And

    I do science and formal operational logic.
    And I prosecute liars (like you).
    And I’m teaching a generation of prosecutors to prosecute liars like you. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:49:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177641528774332416

    Reply addressees: @roytapel @Ozpin_88 @JohnMarkSays @NoGuiltStoic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177641162795970560


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177641162795970560

  • I don’t make mistakes. I have to compensate for all of you useful idiots of thos

    I don’t make mistakes. I have to compensate for all of you useful idiots of those who practice sophism, idealism, supernaturalism and pseudoscience.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:40:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177639043774996485

    Reply addressees: @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177638906138972161


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme Instead we had the Semitic Dark Age of superstition and ignorance, the destruction of every civilization of the ancient world that monotheism could touch, and the self-resurrection of the west, that only succeeded in conquering the world, because china found nothing worthy in it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177638906138972161


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme Instead we had the Semitic Dark Age of superstition and ignorance, the destruction of every civilization of the ancient world that monotheism could touch, and the self-resurrection of the west, that only succeeded in conquering the world, because china found nothing worthy in it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177638906138972161

  • We dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard l

    We dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, poverty, disease, child mortality, early death, tyrrany, and victimization by the vicissitudes of nature. Period. In ust a few centuries in the ancient and modern worlds.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:37:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177638289924333569

    Reply addressees: @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177637898738393093


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme Europeans are in fact superior in achievements for rather obvious reasons: Evidentiary (testimonial) Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Market Meritocracy in everything; The eugenic result; the pursuit of technological advantage due to their small numbers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177637898738393093


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme Europeans are in fact superior in achievements for rather obvious reasons: Evidentiary (testimonial) Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Market Meritocracy in everything; The eugenic result; the pursuit of technological advantage due to their small numbers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177637898738393093

  • You are welcome to try to refute any of the series of propositions. We ended nat

    You are welcome to try to refute any of the series of propositions. We ended nature nurture with nature 80%. We ended gender indifferences. And couched as it may be, we are this year ending group indifferences. Sorry. the most influential factor is the size of the underclass.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:32:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177637100893720577

    Reply addressees: @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177636679223566343


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme Sounds Like is a sophism. Statements are true or false. Contradiction of Truth is lying. So the question is whether or not what I say is true, and whether or not your criticism are attempts a lying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177636679223566343


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @wil_da_beast630 @FernandoLeanme Sounds Like is a sophism. Statements are true or false. Contradiction of Truth is lying. So the question is whether or not what I say is true, and whether or not your criticism are attempts a lying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177636679223566343

  • I am current on all research across the spectrum, and I teach it. Sorry chump. Y

    I am current on all research across the spectrum, and I teach it. Sorry chump. You’ve been throwing GSRRM all the time without making a single substantive argument. The only reason not to block you is to provide insight into how the abrahamic method of lying is used.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:23:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177634782676754432

    Reply addressees: @roytapel @JohnMarkSays @NoGuiltStoic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177634307604500480


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177634307604500480

  • I know you’re sorry that you’ve failed to make an argument but you have. Please

    I know you’re sorry that you’ve failed to make an argument but you have. Please try to counter anything I’ve said. you won’t. You can’t. I do science. Sorry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 17:19:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177633912824180738

    Reply addressees: @roytapel @NoGuiltStoic @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177633699262713857


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177633699262713857