Theme: Science

  • You are the first to publicly complain amidst the benefits of anglo rule of law,

    You are the first to publicly complain amidst the benefits of anglo rule of law, finance, technology, medicine that made your complaining possible, and you will be the first to complain in the dead of winter without power, water, food, and with the underclasses preying upon you.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 21:14:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178780247883468800

    Reply addressees: @BridgetPhetasy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178501601935233025


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BridgetPhetasy

    America is too fat for a Civil War.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178501601935233025

  • REDUCING THE CANNON OF THE WEST TO A BIBLE The west never had a bible, but a can

    REDUCING THE CANNON OF THE WEST TO A BIBLE

    The west never had a bible, but a canon, and that canon was written in multiple frames although primarily scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological.

    While we traditional had rule of law beyond which no leader may tread, we allowed liberalism (even classical liberalism) to violate that traditional law.

    Philosophy theology tradition are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes.

    Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for.

    Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the english civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution.

    But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program (yes).

    They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church.

    The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, and

    So we must complete the greco-roman-germanic-anglo-american research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation.

    We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to jewish law and muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the *social political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation*.

    We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread.

    Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war.

    That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 18:37:00 UTC

  • I’m Curt Doolittle, a philosopher of Jurisprudence (decidability), the Natural L

    I’m Curt Doolittle, a philosopher of Jurisprudence (decidability), the Natural Law (reciprocity), Testimony (science), and the strict construction of Constitutions, Legislation, Regulation, Contract, and Findings of the Court in matters of dispute.

    Our Revolution Comes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 15:45:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178697482341097477

  • I should since the marxist, feminist, pomo, denialist program is an attempt to o

    I should since the marxist, feminist, pomo, denialist program is an attempt to overthrow darwin just as abrahamic religions (and even confucius) were attempts to overthrow greek reason and empiricism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 20:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178400109421305857

    Reply addressees: @alynpost

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178395198625214464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178395198625214464

  • P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“You

    P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)

    —-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter

    (That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.)

    The Methodology:

    Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization.

    Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements.

    So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous).

    Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement.

    The question is only the precision of the measures.

    P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:29:00 UTC

  • A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cer

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX

    —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346

    No.

    1. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups of columns); homogenous in structure but differing in neural density by physical origin of nerves that enter them.

    2. So no it’s not fractal: the average size of a human cortex, if laid out flat would be approximately the size of a dinner napkin, and just as thick. The rest of the neocortex consists entirely of white matter (nerve fibers: axons) which connect everything to everything.

    3. With the hippocampus consolidating and organizing information, and then using rehearsal (replay) to encode episodes of memory, and thalamus controlling attention (what gets thru to the neocortex for computation, and basal ganglia that surrounds both releasing physical actions.

    4. Most of the advanced functions of the brain consist of these three ‘levers’ and the natural increase in reflection created by increasing brain size, from back (senses) to front (permuting, planning, manipulating). So the brain functions as a series of loops (operating system)

    5. That recursively process a moment of information and merge it with the next moment of information in a continuous stream which we can ‘buffer’ with a half life of just a few seconds, and no more than twenty or so. By Comparison of these moments we discern change in state.

    6. When people say the brain isn’t a computer they’re only a tiny bit right. It does operate in binary (on off) and frequency (hertz), and by competition for attention but with unimaginable numbers of connections in unimaginable parallel, in a continuous loop (OS).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:28:00 UTC

  • Um. One question. What is the difference between the terminal velocity of a cat,

    Um. One question. What is the difference between the terminal velocity of a cat, and a mouse?

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 20:41:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178047095678390274

  • QUESTION: One question. What is the difference between the terminal velocity of

    QUESTION: One question. What is the difference between the terminal velocity of a cat, and a mouse?

    ANSWER:

    A man’s terminal velocity is 210 km/h (130 mph).

    A cat’s terminal velocity is 100 km/h (60 mph)

    A mouse’s terminal velocity is ~10km/h (6 mph)

    OLD STUFF:

    “Down 1000 foot mine shaft, a mouse walks away (not true), a rat dies (certainly), a man breaks (certainly, very), and a horse splashes.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 16:41:00 UTC

  • A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cer

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX

    —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=474259816504247&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:18:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177935644770877440

  • It’s science (operational logic) not set logic, and so yes, I can’t falsify it –

    It’s science (operational logic) not set logic, and so yes, I can’t falsify it -nor can anyone else. Also, I don’t think a proof means what you think it does. It’s a test of internal consistency (of words). So axioms (arbitrary verbal rules) vs Laws (necessary actions). …


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:07:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177932963876614144

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177923129022304257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177923129022304257