Einstein like Bohr and Cantor is interesting having solving the equations before Hilbert, but in doing so, divorced physics from classical geometric mathematics. He is also notable for being wrong about everything else. “It’s a credit to europe that so naive a man could survive.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 02:05:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231762058896662529
Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231708369720836096
ALL OF THESE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE
—“Physics is too hard for physicists.”—Mathematician
—“Economics is too hard for economists”—Physicist
—“Social science is too hard for social scientists”—Economist
—“Psychology is too hard for psychologists”–Behavioral economist
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 16:09:00 UTC
The reason most people have failed is that they have tried to create a moral philosophy, a secular religion, or a restored religion. The way I chose to attack the enemy was with science first secular philosophy second, and restored religion third.
Now, it still all depends upon whether the incentives are sufficient for us to win.
But at least I didn’t repeat past failures.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 15:46:00 UTC
The Parade of undermining western civ. with pseudoscience, sophism, and lies: Cantor, Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno-Fromm, Derrida, Friedan, and hundreds of followers and thousands of propagandists: unwarrantable, false promise, baiting into hazard, with Pilpul, Critique and “GSRRM”.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 17:28:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231269450898341888
Reply addressees: @mjs_DC @Slate
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231267542171340801
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@mjs_DC @Slate Sotomayor and Ginsberg will be gone before Trump is.
Hart Cellar was a violation of the natural law of the constitution and the means by which the postwar jewish left succeeded in immigrating dependents where marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism and denialism had failed.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1231267542171340801
TESTIMONY – P IS SCIENTIFIC(LOGICAL, OPERATIONAL, EMPIRICAL) ARTICULATION OF OUR ANCIENT TRADITIONS.
by Scott Strong
What’s brilliant about you Curt is your ability to articulate it all so methodically. The reality is these Western ideas weren’t really formed by one great philosopher but are rather an an hod, kit-bashed collection of mostly intuitive practices that our ancestors accumulated, not out of some great philosophy or moral conviction, so much as pure pragmatism in that they were the best practices that simply *worked* and because if people did things that *didn’t* work, the group would die in battle, or starve in the lean winter months.
Propertarianism is not your invention, but rather your codification and articulation of the mostly intuitive unconscious pragmatic wisdom of our ancestors.
===
(That’s right. I just wrote it down for the first time the way others have written their bibles of primitive thought in primitive language. It may not have been possible to our body of advanced thought until we had an advanced language to write it in. But we’ve been practicing it for thousands of years. And that’s why propertarianism is a product of our European civilization, not me – i’m not that important and our ancestors are. And that is why it has more legitimacy than some other nonsense some philosopher pulled out of his had. I’m just a scientists discovering and capturing the rules of western civilization.
I’m just doing natural science in the natural law of our people – writing down the formulae.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:37:00 UTC
THERE IS ONLY ONE SCIENTIFIC METHOD FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF GODS – AND I THINK WE KNOW IT
—“Empirical mechanism for such phenomena not yet found, “—
Well as the top physicists have already stated, we know the complete spectrum of forces because there is no ‘room’ for any other force. So no, no information can exist in the spectrum. I can’t remember who works on this (but I know how to find out), and it’s sort of taboo for the reasons that are obvious – it threatens faith the occult that faith depends upon.
But, just as we know the complete composition of chemistry, we know the complete composition of interacting forces. What we don’t know is the geometry of the primary force that creates the grammar we know of as quantum mechanics, that would explain gravity at the quantum level and unite quantum(small) and relativistic (large) – both of which are currently descriptive rather than causal.
God is just what I said it was above: an archetypal character with whom we intuititionistically(auto-associatively) role play (predict), as we would a parent or headman, and through that filter – a filter to whom we are as transparent as we were to parents and headmen – we can judge our intuitions.
Man is the measure of all things to man, because man is the only system of measurement available to man. God is a system of measurement in the group’s ideal of man to imitate (jesus, Achilles) a demigod to aspire to (odin, Hercules,), a god to negotiate with (zeus, thor, tyr), one to obey (jehova, allah), or one to simply understand (deism, the physical and natural laws). Any creature inventing a god would invent one in his image just as we have – and just as the hundreds of gods have been invented abandoned or lost before the present gods.
Science killed the lie of god and discovered the truth of god, and the laws of the universe, and only europeans have done so.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:25:00 UTC
SCIENCE PRESERVING FAITH
They means of preserving the faith under the science of gods as information, is that while protocol is behavior, and the transmission between people (nodes, modules) is slow (in itself a survival technique), it is possible that the host (body of the faithful) functions as a collectively subconscious organism, and that given synchronicity, we all operate as if there were a physical connection, when in fact, the only connection is the information we are subject to by our sense, perception, auto-association. This provides a rational and scientific explanation for why religion does work despite the pantheon of grammars we express it in. It explains the value of Jesus and nature for the submissive (uncompetitive) and the traditional(dominant, competitive) european gods as dominance expression. This ends the problem of the multiplicity of conflicting gods, and the evident and undeniable failure of gods in all material things, and that god created the universe, but leaves the rest of theology intact. So this leaves us with a scientific view of every religion that does not seek to dominate any other religion, and falsifies every religion that does seek to dominate other religions. Furthermore, it explains the western pantheon of scientific, normative-legal, ideal philosophical and theological grammars as satisfying the language of each group of ‘gods’ in our pantheon. If you pray to your god, talk to your god, or think in the language of your deity, or your deism, you will participate in the construction of that ‘will’.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:45:00 UTC
THE QUALIA OF GEOMETRY IS UNIFORM
by Andrew M Gilmour
If Dennett built more on cog/sci and less on phenomenology. Dennett also made the mistake of using colour for uniformity of qualia as opposed to geometry (ancient Greeks). The qualia of geometry is uniform; the qualia of colour is not. *Uniform across human personal consciousness.
—-
CD: Well done. Will add that to our geometry presentation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:30:00 UTC
DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS
—“You know, P language reminds me of a direction I think Danial Dennett was going with how to study consciousness (Phenomenology), but P is more complete. It was in his book “consciousness explained”.”— Adam Jacob Robert Walker
Yes, well we are all subject to the same information and converging on the same solution. And I’m just the one who put it all together first.
Probably because I started with ai, programming and economics instead of philosophy and psychology.
So as the neurological revolution unfolded over the past twenty years I had less of a paradigm shift than the other thinkers.
And I don’t have pressure to publish. So I just kept working without anchoring myself.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 10:36:00 UTC
Who discovered rule of law by the natural right of reciprocity
Who discovered the republic democracy and rule of law
Who discovered reason, logic, natural philosophy and science
Who discovered natural rights philosophy
Who discovered the common law and napoleonic code?
Who discovered the Peace of Westphalia domesticating war?
Who discovered the Geneva conventions?
Who discovered the international charter of human rights?
Who discovered science technology medicine and dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death?
Yeah. I know. White people.
Yeah, colonialism wasn’t so good.
Yeah, it was just better than everyone else’s alternative..
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 20:18:00 UTC