Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • Eric and Brett: The Weinstein Brothers Reach-Around

    THE WEINSTEIN BROTHERS REACH-AROUND [A] central theme of my work is the difference in civilizational methods of argument, especially European-male scientific-juridical adversarial-testimony of advancing stated interests openly versus Jewish-female gossiping-undermining justification-consensus method of advancing unstated or hidden interests by undermining oppositions interests. Watch any Brett or Eric Weinstein video and count how many times they  1) use ‘heaping undue praise’. 2) use a ‘test of reasonableness instead of truth‘, 3) use ‘critique of the system‘ that they cannot create, or get access to (loyalty, commons defect). 4) Use “pilpul to cover a presumption” someone didn’t know something prior, or that a concept wasn’t known, or a tradition didn’t exist in western civ. 5) ‘straw man‘ a group of people and their incentives. 6) Using dialectic to commit all of the above frauds in order to position themselves as capable. This is the Abrahamic method of deceit. It’s a process of undermining by overloading with suggestion and deceit rather than truthful description. This is the female method of indirect communication in order to limit offense and show support of allies, or in order to undermine enemies, but without every trying to come up with solutions. And any man that’s had to learn women don’t want solutions to problems and men only want solutions to problems will be aware of this difference in the techniques of the genders.  In other words, all jews are cognitively female.  And this is a particularly useful strategy in an era of radio and television an not as useful a strategy in the age of print – which is rather obvious when comparing Jewish and European authors. Once you know what they’re doing it’s unbearable. They’re gossiping. And they’re just gossiping about interesting nerdy stuff. And the point of their gossip is to increase one another’s self-image and reputation by gossiping in public, to create the pretense that either party is worth listening to at all. When in fact they aren’t. They don’t have solutions. You wouldn’t trust either of them to implement a solution. They just complain.  Which is the ancient criticism of the jews: the work hard (like women), and they complain (like women). But every Jewish solution is suicidal: Christianity, Islam, Marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, political correctness (HBD denialism). Those are for no other purpose than to undermine male hierarchical eugenic competitive, solution-focused, technology providing, man-enabling civilization. And that’s is why jews accomplished nothing in their entire history except the art of baiting-into-hazard until their plausible deniability was no longer deniable and they were cast out of over a hundred countries. Yet once offered entry into western civilization’s social order in exchange for adopting Aristotelianism they were able to make achievements – at the cost of undermining western civilization from within as they had every other civilization before us. And once again, after a century of Jewish liberty in the west, from Bolshevism, Naziism to resist bolshevism, and the movement of bolshevism to America, and its transformation from marxism (class undermining); to neo-marxism (cultural undermining); to postmodernism (truth undermining); to Anti-male Feminism (marriage undermining); to political correctness (HBD and eugenic denialism) – their crimes against host peoples are no longer plausibly deniable: they are antithetical to civilization, and they consider their success at mastering the criminal art of baiting-into-hazard,  and profiting from undermining host peoples, a laudable achievement – rather than parasitism upon host peoples by crimes that are difficult to outlaw and prosecute without impinging upon the opportunities a high trust people can capture because we don’t engage in that undermining ourselves. MATHEMATICS Math is tedious and burdensome on short term memory.  It is not, however, ‘difficult’. It’s just a language for measurement of points (references) using positional names, by distilling causality to the number of dimensions the human mind is capable of tracking with symbols. That’s why math fails at the very small and very large: we run out of things to average into points (positional names). a) Eric does not grasp the foundations of mathematics which is why he can’t discern its limits. b) He doesn’t address that wolfram’s new continuous computational math is more likely correct, and more likely to solve the underlying problem. Or, that above and beyond wolfram’s continued use of point’s and vectors there is a geometric version of his work that doesn’t have the problem of time and sequence – although wolfram might yet discover it c) Or that Eric’s deduction (from his lectures) was a failure – he hasn’t solved it and no one has even chosen to run with it. d) Or why Eric is right that economics is ‘using the wrong calculus’ but that even if they use the right calculus the information doesn’t exist to calculate with, and they still aren’t accounting for changes in all capital so we’re in far worse shape than what the productivity data shows. e) That the interesting mathematics in economics is the emergency of symmetries that could compensate for the lack of information – at least at the macro scale. b) Brett panders to him. But for example, look at the conservative crab-bucket dragging all others down, and the Jewish ant-ladder to help people up. That’s the point of heaping of undue praise (creating undeserved reputations) versus critique (undermining deserved reputations). This is why Dialectic = Pilpul = Gossiping = UnderminingSOLUTIONS I don’t even like attention. It’s just necessary to do my work. But my work is in pursuit of a set of solutions, and my body of work a set of solutions to the great problems of history: the formal logic of language, psychology, sociology – the human, sentient, or soft sciences. And its embodiment in law. That solution includes the means of outlawing Jewish specialization in undermining by false promises that bait people into hazard for profit (including attention and status) until plausible deniability that they function as an organized crime family profiting from civilizational capital destruction is no longer tenable. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

    Notice that  Kevin Macdonald (Psychology, Science, Intellectual History) @TOOEdit , Ricardo Duchesne (Sociology, Philosophy, Intellectual History) @DuchesneRicardo, and I, Curt Doolittle (Economics, Law, Computability) @CurtDoolittle all arrive at the same basic conclusion from different fields over the course of thirty years. Not because we set out to solve that problem but once we discovered it we were astounded by the impact – that the Abrahamic Method of Deceit is as powerful a method of lying as the Aristotelian Method of Testimony is a powerful method of speaking the truth. 

  • Eric and Brett: The Weinstein Brothers Reach-Around

    THE WEINSTEIN BROTHERS REACH-AROUND [A] central theme of my work is the difference in civilizational methods of argument, especially European-male scientific-juridical adversarial-testimony of advancing stated interests openly versus Jewish-female gossiping-undermining justification-consensus method of advancing unstated or hidden interests by undermining oppositions interests. Watch any Brett or Eric Weinstein video and count how many times they  1) use ‘heaping undue praise’. 2) use a ‘test of reasonableness instead of truth‘, 3) use ‘critique of the system‘ that they cannot create, or get access to (loyalty, commons defect). 4) Use “pilpul to cover a presumption” someone didn’t know something prior, or that a concept wasn’t known, or a tradition didn’t exist in western civ. 5) ‘straw man‘ a group of people and their incentives. 6) Using dialectic to commit all of the above frauds in order to position themselves as capable. This is the Abrahamic method of deceit. It’s a process of undermining by overloading with suggestion and deceit rather than truthful description. This is the female method of indirect communication in order to limit offense and show support of allies, or in order to undermine enemies, but without every trying to come up with solutions. And any man that’s had to learn women don’t want solutions to problems and men only want solutions to problems will be aware of this difference in the techniques of the genders.  In other words, all jews are cognitively female.  And this is a particularly useful strategy in an era of radio and television an not as useful a strategy in the age of print – which is rather obvious when comparing Jewish and European authors. Once you know what they’re doing it’s unbearable. They’re gossiping. And they’re just gossiping about interesting nerdy stuff. And the point of their gossip is to increase one another’s self-image and reputation by gossiping in public, to create the pretense that either party is worth listening to at all. When in fact they aren’t. They don’t have solutions. You wouldn’t trust either of them to implement a solution. They just complain.  Which is the ancient criticism of the jews: the work hard (like women), and they complain (like women). But every Jewish solution is suicidal: Christianity, Islam, Marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, political correctness (HBD denialism). Those are for no other purpose than to undermine male hierarchical eugenic competitive, solution-focused, technology providing, man-enabling civilization. And that’s is why jews accomplished nothing in their entire history except the art of baiting-into-hazard until their plausible deniability was no longer deniable and they were cast out of over a hundred countries. Yet once offered entry into western civilization’s social order in exchange for adopting Aristotelianism they were able to make achievements – at the cost of undermining western civilization from within as they had every other civilization before us. And once again, after a century of Jewish liberty in the west, from Bolshevism, Naziism to resist bolshevism, and the movement of bolshevism to America, and its transformation from marxism (class undermining); to neo-marxism (cultural undermining); to postmodernism (truth undermining); to Anti-male Feminism (marriage undermining); to political correctness (HBD and eugenic denialism) – their crimes against host peoples are no longer plausibly deniable: they are antithetical to civilization, and they consider their success at mastering the criminal art of baiting-into-hazard,  and profiting from undermining host peoples, a laudable achievement – rather than parasitism upon host peoples by crimes that are difficult to outlaw and prosecute without impinging upon the opportunities a high trust people can capture because we don’t engage in that undermining ourselves. MATHEMATICS Math is tedious and burdensome on short term memory.  It is not, however, ‘difficult’. It’s just a language for measurement of points (references) using positional names, by distilling causality to the number of dimensions the human mind is capable of tracking with symbols. That’s why math fails at the very small and very large: we run out of things to average into points (positional names). a) Eric does not grasp the foundations of mathematics which is why he can’t discern its limits. b) He doesn’t address that wolfram’s new continuous computational math is more likely correct, and more likely to solve the underlying problem. Or, that above and beyond wolfram’s continued use of point’s and vectors there is a geometric version of his work that doesn’t have the problem of time and sequence – although wolfram might yet discover it c) Or that Eric’s deduction (from his lectures) was a failure – he hasn’t solved it and no one has even chosen to run with it. d) Or why Eric is right that economics is ‘using the wrong calculus’ but that even if they use the right calculus the information doesn’t exist to calculate with, and they still aren’t accounting for changes in all capital so we’re in far worse shape than what the productivity data shows. e) That the interesting mathematics in economics is the emergency of symmetries that could compensate for the lack of information – at least at the macro scale. b) Brett panders to him. But for example, look at the conservative crab-bucket dragging all others down, and the Jewish ant-ladder to help people up. That’s the point of heaping of undue praise (creating undeserved reputations) versus critique (undermining deserved reputations). This is why Dialectic = Pilpul = Gossiping = UnderminingSOLUTIONS I don’t even like attention. It’s just necessary to do my work. But my work is in pursuit of a set of solutions, and my body of work a set of solutions to the great problems of history: the formal logic of language, psychology, sociology – the human, sentient, or soft sciences. And its embodiment in law. That solution includes the means of outlawing Jewish specialization in undermining by false promises that bait people into hazard for profit (including attention and status) until plausible deniability that they function as an organized crime family profiting from civilizational capital destruction is no longer tenable. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

    Notice that  Kevin Macdonald (Psychology, Science, Intellectual History) @TOOEdit , Ricardo Duchesne (Sociology, Philosophy, Intellectual History) @DuchesneRicardo, and I, Curt Doolittle (Economics, Law, Computability) @CurtDoolittle all arrive at the same basic conclusion from different fields over the course of thirty years. Not because we set out to solve that problem but once we discovered it we were astounded by the impact – that the Abrahamic Method of Deceit is as powerful a method of lying as the Aristotelian Method of Testimony is a powerful method of speaking the truth. 

  • P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism …

    P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism …. https://t.co/4C9UEB6FWJ

  • P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism …

    P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism …. https://propertarianism.com/2020/07/17/p-is-just-science-if-you-think-science-science-is-white-supremacism/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 15:50:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284153612906700808

  • P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism ….

    P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFECTED’ WITH THE ABRAHAMIC FALSE PROMISE – NO MORE LIES.

    —“My wife finally watched some of our videos and then read some of the P website and now she’s calling me a white supremacist and won’t sleep in the same bed as me. I didn’t expect that reaction. I don’t know what to do about it. Any help you can offer?”—

    Women don’t often reason in politics easily because of their fear of ostracization, ridicule, or criticism is so much stronger than ours – it’s not fixable most of the time without age and children. My work is ‘for everyone’. It says that Europeans discovered and adapted to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and evolved thought, culture, and institutions that gave us a vast evolutionary advantage over the rest of the world – in both the ancient and modern worlds. This evolutionary advantage resulted in some behavioral changes (lower clannishness, greater neoteny, and frankly, higher sexual market value) but mostly, the benefit is the result (like the Chinese) of the reduction of our underclasses, through manorialism (regulating access to farmland), and the natural eugenics of natural selection by farming in cold weather climates. So the sciences explain European cultural supremacism as nothing more than greater adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – the most important being truth before face, and where ‘truth’ means military reporting, or what we call evidentiary truth in court. We use military reporting and courtroom speech as our normal speech in everyday life. And the effects of this ‘continuous training’ were profound – they produced our unique high trust polity and made our ability to produce commons for all rather than prestige for each, as a competitive weapon. The science also explains why it is very difficult for all but middle and upper-middle peoples from other civilizations to adapt to compete in our civilization Every people can adopt western judicial, social, political, and ‘truthful speech’ technology just as they have our scientific, technical, and financial technologies. And everyone can adopt our ‘soft eugenics’ by requiring self-sufficiency before reproduction (and punishment for reproduction without self-sufficiency). Yes, we may have to allow people to separate into communities now that we have BROKEN physical natural and evolutionary laws. We broke those laws because of the late 19th and 20th-century pseudoscientific counter-revolution against those laws, with the Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminists, and Political Correctness (lying by denying) lies that those laws can be avoided. We broke those laws in the past century just like we did in the supernatural counter-revolution against those laws in ancient world by the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim counter-revolution. In the ancient world, they blamed the Romans (meaning Europeans) for adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and they invented the Abrahamic religions to rebel against and destroy the great civilizations of the ancient world – and we had the dark ages. And in the 19th and 20th and now 21st centuries they blame Europeans for the discovery and adaptation to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws and invented economic and social pseudoscience, to destroy western civilization once again – and create another dark age. A dark age that is already in its first stages. And it is this revolution in evolution, and the counter-revolution against evolution, that is the great battle of human history: once indo-Europeans discovered we could transcend our physical and cognitive limitations by adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary law, that meant evolution was accelerated – and that some peoples would be left behind. So instead of being left behind by evolution, they undermined the means by which evolution was created: the great civilizations that discovered adapted to, and applied physical natural and evolutionary laws. Or in simple terms, the Abrahamic Peoples appeal to women’s nature, and the underclass’s stresses by blaming european people for the laws of nature and nature’s god – thus themselves claiming we are in fact superior. When it is, at least by the evidence, our willingness to adapt to the laws of nature and nature’s god that allows us to produced outcomes superior to that of the rest of the world combined, in but a few hundred years in the ancient and modern worlds. The Abrahamic Peoples, and willing Christian accomplices, used our open democracy, the vulnerability of women’s emotions, our flood of pre-war, war-era, and postwar immigrants, European guilt over the nazi positive (aggressive) eugenics program, the plight of the black community, and the mass media, to undermine our demand for integration into natural soft eugenics by the use of markets in everything, the nuclear family, delayed reproduction, our rule of law, limiting our public behavior to manners of ‘church and court’, our limit of public speech to empirical testimony, our truth before face in speech to the public in matters public, and the Christian religion that European protestants transformed into a germanic folk religion of ‘status’ (salvation) by hard work, piety, and social discipline that persisted our integration. The Abrahamic peoples this time in pseudoscientific (marxism, socialism, Freudianism, boazianism, pseudomathematics), and lying by sophistry and denial (postmodernism, feminism, and human nature denialism) to destroy western civilization from within as they did every other civilization of the ancient world. They did it by selling the false promise (lies) of endless growth and therefore the end of scarcity (heaven on earth), the nature of man (fallen angel), the malleability of man (blank slate) – all cognitive biases of mothers so that they continue to support their children no matter their quality and capability. And the cognitive bias of those who confuse willingness to engage in moral productive behavior is the same as the ability to compete for survival in moral productive behavior. They sold these false promises as oppression by European peoples, rather than the European peoples’ discovery of the means of transcending our animal limits and gaining power over ourselves and nature. And they profited in politics from selling these lies from selling the false promise socialism – an invitation to suicide; from selling the myth of oppression rather than the cost of integration; from selling ‘courses in pseudoscience’ to vast numbers of women, to be indoctrinated into their pseudoscientific and sophomoric new religion of oppression; from using the academic proceeds to produce pseudo-scientific propaganda, and take over the university system; to train young teachers from the bottom 1/6 of their high school classes his pseudoscience, with no life experience, and no sufficient education to reinforce it; by immigrating vast numbers of underclasses and those hostile to advanced civilization so that they could obtain political power to destroy our civilization; by financial profiteering selling interest on housing credit and consumption, in addition to 100k educations, so that it was no longer possible to reproduce; To selling the myth that people suffer in life rather than the continuous evolution of people under our civilization out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, and disease. To creating news and entertainment that justifies the oppression myth; To take over news networks and sell propaganda all day long; To using every lie possible to destroy our civilization from within. Since anyone of at least middle-class ability, can adopt and adapt to European civilization’s discovery, adaptation to, and application of physical natural and evolutionary laws, the present political problem is integration – not race, and class – not race. The difference between the races is largely in the size of the classes. And nothing can fix it except birth control at the bottom. The law of evolution is very simple: The lower classes must continually shrink in relation to the degree of energy transformation (productivity). Population increases only benefit banks and the state at the expense of the middle. There are 100M too many Americans already, given the economy of this new century. The people who hate us hate us because THEY are white supremacists and we are not. We are merely scientists trying to solve the problem of the age with political and economic solutions that allow us to help one another in markets without hating each other in politics, and without causing another dark age, as the underclasses led by women’s emotions, destroy our civilization like they have the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Egyptians, North Africans, and northwest Indians. Those civilizations are dead. And they were made dead by the same means: shouting down the truth, destroying monuments, and undermining traditions. Our proposal is ‘love everyone with the truth’ because you’re just generating hate with convenient lies. Many small homogenous communities with low political power distance allow the largest number of people ‘at the top’ and the smallest number ‘at the bottom’ creating the only equality that is possible: among those with similar kinship interests. And if some people want to try large urban heterogeneous polities and pay the (very high) costs and consequences of them then that’s fine – but they many not drag us into the same destruction that they have every other people that the Abrahamic system of lying and undermining has touched. It is the human equivalent of civilizational cancer. I’m gonna die on the hills of 2) ‘We are in this for mankind: end the globalist project to produce another dark age and destroy our identity, and maintain it by inter-state continuous evolution by competition”, “European civilization is the most advanced in EVERY technology – especially social”. And yes, Europeans – or at least many of us, need to separate and preserve our genetic, normative, traditional, cultural, and institutional advantages until others can ‘catch up’ without dragging us down into another dark age. Because that’s the science. No more lies. Even to our loving coddle wives, the fears of other women, anxiety teenage girls, and those boys-not-yet-men among us that can not tolerate the truth: we must take responsibility for ourselves, our polity, and mankind if we wish to pass through the second great filter: eugenics.

  • P Is Just Science. If You Think Science Science Is White Supremacism ….

    P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFECTED’ WITH THE ABRAHAMIC FALSE PROMISE – NO MORE LIES.

    —“My wife finally watched some of our videos and then read some of the P website and now she’s calling me a white supremacist and won’t sleep in the same bed as me. I didn’t expect that reaction. I don’t know what to do about it. Any help you can offer?”—

    Women don’t often reason in politics easily because of their fear of ostracization, ridicule, or criticism is so much stronger than ours – it’s not fixable most of the time without age and children. My work is ‘for everyone’. It says that Europeans discovered and adapted to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and evolved thought, culture, and institutions that gave us a vast evolutionary advantage over the rest of the world – in both the ancient and modern worlds. This evolutionary advantage resulted in some behavioral changes (lower clannishness, greater neoteny, and frankly, higher sexual market value) but mostly, the benefit is the result (like the Chinese) of the reduction of our underclasses, through manorialism (regulating access to farmland), and the natural eugenics of natural selection by farming in cold weather climates. So the sciences explain European cultural supremacism as nothing more than greater adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – the most important being truth before face, and where ‘truth’ means military reporting, or what we call evidentiary truth in court. We use military reporting and courtroom speech as our normal speech in everyday life. And the effects of this ‘continuous training’ were profound – they produced our unique high trust polity and made our ability to produce commons for all rather than prestige for each, as a competitive weapon. The science also explains why it is very difficult for all but middle and upper-middle peoples from other civilizations to adapt to compete in our civilization Every people can adopt western judicial, social, political, and ‘truthful speech’ technology just as they have our scientific, technical, and financial technologies. And everyone can adopt our ‘soft eugenics’ by requiring self-sufficiency before reproduction (and punishment for reproduction without self-sufficiency). Yes, we may have to allow people to separate into communities now that we have BROKEN physical natural and evolutionary laws. We broke those laws because of the late 19th and 20th-century pseudoscientific counter-revolution against those laws, with the Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminists, and Political Correctness (lying by denying) lies that those laws can be avoided. We broke those laws in the past century just like we did in the supernatural counter-revolution against those laws in ancient world by the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim counter-revolution. In the ancient world, they blamed the Romans (meaning Europeans) for adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and they invented the Abrahamic religions to rebel against and destroy the great civilizations of the ancient world – and we had the dark ages. And in the 19th and 20th and now 21st centuries they blame Europeans for the discovery and adaptation to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws and invented economic and social pseudoscience, to destroy western civilization once again – and create another dark age. A dark age that is already in its first stages. And it is this revolution in evolution, and the counter-revolution against evolution, that is the great battle of human history: once indo-Europeans discovered we could transcend our physical and cognitive limitations by adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary law, that meant evolution was accelerated – and that some peoples would be left behind. So instead of being left behind by evolution, they undermined the means by which evolution was created: the great civilizations that discovered adapted to, and applied physical natural and evolutionary laws. Or in simple terms, the Abrahamic Peoples appeal to women’s nature, and the underclass’s stresses by blaming european people for the laws of nature and nature’s god – thus themselves claiming we are in fact superior. When it is, at least by the evidence, our willingness to adapt to the laws of nature and nature’s god that allows us to produced outcomes superior to that of the rest of the world combined, in but a few hundred years in the ancient and modern worlds. The Abrahamic Peoples, and willing Christian accomplices, used our open democracy, the vulnerability of women’s emotions, our flood of pre-war, war-era, and postwar immigrants, European guilt over the nazi positive (aggressive) eugenics program, the plight of the black community, and the mass media, to undermine our demand for integration into natural soft eugenics by the use of markets in everything, the nuclear family, delayed reproduction, our rule of law, limiting our public behavior to manners of ‘church and court’, our limit of public speech to empirical testimony, our truth before face in speech to the public in matters public, and the Christian religion that European protestants transformed into a germanic folk religion of ‘status’ (salvation) by hard work, piety, and social discipline that persisted our integration. The Abrahamic peoples this time in pseudoscientific (marxism, socialism, Freudianism, boazianism, pseudomathematics), and lying by sophistry and denial (postmodernism, feminism, and human nature denialism) to destroy western civilization from within as they did every other civilization of the ancient world. They did it by selling the false promise (lies) of endless growth and therefore the end of scarcity (heaven on earth), the nature of man (fallen angel), the malleability of man (blank slate) – all cognitive biases of mothers so that they continue to support their children no matter their quality and capability. And the cognitive bias of those who confuse willingness to engage in moral productive behavior is the same as the ability to compete for survival in moral productive behavior. They sold these false promises as oppression by European peoples, rather than the European peoples’ discovery of the means of transcending our animal limits and gaining power over ourselves and nature. And they profited in politics from selling these lies from selling the false promise socialism – an invitation to suicide; from selling the myth of oppression rather than the cost of integration; from selling ‘courses in pseudoscience’ to vast numbers of women, to be indoctrinated into their pseudoscientific and sophomoric new religion of oppression; from using the academic proceeds to produce pseudo-scientific propaganda, and take over the university system; to train young teachers from the bottom 1/6 of their high school classes his pseudoscience, with no life experience, and no sufficient education to reinforce it; by immigrating vast numbers of underclasses and those hostile to advanced civilization so that they could obtain political power to destroy our civilization; by financial profiteering selling interest on housing credit and consumption, in addition to 100k educations, so that it was no longer possible to reproduce; To selling the myth that people suffer in life rather than the continuous evolution of people under our civilization out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, and disease. To creating news and entertainment that justifies the oppression myth; To take over news networks and sell propaganda all day long; To using every lie possible to destroy our civilization from within. Since anyone of at least middle-class ability, can adopt and adapt to European civilization’s discovery, adaptation to, and application of physical natural and evolutionary laws, the present political problem is integration – not race, and class – not race. The difference between the races is largely in the size of the classes. And nothing can fix it except birth control at the bottom. The law of evolution is very simple: The lower classes must continually shrink in relation to the degree of energy transformation (productivity). Population increases only benefit banks and the state at the expense of the middle. There are 100M too many Americans already, given the economy of this new century. The people who hate us hate us because THEY are white supremacists and we are not. We are merely scientists trying to solve the problem of the age with political and economic solutions that allow us to help one another in markets without hating each other in politics, and without causing another dark age, as the underclasses led by women’s emotions, destroy our civilization like they have the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Egyptians, North Africans, and northwest Indians. Those civilizations are dead. And they were made dead by the same means: shouting down the truth, destroying monuments, and undermining traditions. Our proposal is ‘love everyone with the truth’ because you’re just generating hate with convenient lies. Many small homogenous communities with low political power distance allow the largest number of people ‘at the top’ and the smallest number ‘at the bottom’ creating the only equality that is possible: among those with similar kinship interests. And if some people want to try large urban heterogeneous polities and pay the (very high) costs and consequences of them then that’s fine – but they many not drag us into the same destruction that they have every other people that the Abrahamic system of lying and undermining has touched. It is the human equivalent of civilizational cancer. I’m gonna die on the hills of 2) ‘We are in this for mankind: end the globalist project to produce another dark age and destroy our identity, and maintain it by inter-state continuous evolution by competition”, “European civilization is the most advanced in EVERY technology – especially social”. And yes, Europeans – or at least many of us, need to separate and preserve our genetic, normative, traditional, cultural, and institutional advantages until others can ‘catch up’ without dragging us down into another dark age. Because that’s the science. No more lies. Even to our loving coddle wives, the fears of other women, anxiety teenage girls, and those boys-not-yet-men among us that can not tolerate the truth: we must take responsibility for ourselves, our polity, and mankind if we wish to pass through the second great filter: eugenics.

  • P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFEC

    P IS JUST SCIENCE. IF YOU THINK SCIENCE IS WHITE SUPREMACISM THEN YOU ARE ‘INFECTED’ WITH THE ABRAHAMIC FALSE PROMISE – NO MORE LIES.

    (updated)

    —“My wife finally watched some of our videos and then read some of the P website and now she’s calling me a white supremacist and won’t sleep in the same bed as me. I didn’t expect that reaction. I don’t know what to do about it. Any help you can offer?”—

    Women don’t often reason in politics easily because of their fear of ostracization, ridicule, or criticism is so much stronger than ours – it’s not fixable most of the time without age and children.

    My work is ‘for everyone’. It says that Europeans discovered and adapted to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and evolved thought, culture, and institutions that gave us a vast evolutionary advantage over the rest of the world – in both the ancient and modern worlds.

    This evolutionary advantage resulted in some behavioral changes (lower clannishness, greater neoteny, and frankly, higher sexual market value) but mostly, the benefit is the result (like the Chinese) of the reduction of our underclasses, through manorialism (regulating access to farmland), and the natural eugenics of natural selection by farming in cold weather climates.

    So the sciences explain European cultural supremacism as nothing more than greater adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – the most important being truth before face, and where ‘truth’ means military reporting, or what we call evidentiary truth in court. We use military reporting and courtroom speech as our normal speech in everyday life. And the effects of this ‘continuous training’ were profound – they produced our unique high trust polity and made our ability to produce commons for all rather than prestige for each, as a competitive weapon.

    The science also explains why it is very difficult for all but middle and upper-middle peoples from other civilizations to adapt to compete in our civilization

    Every people can adopt western judicial, social, political, and ‘truthful speech’ technology just as they have our scientific, technical, and financial technologies. And everyone can adopt our ‘soft eugenics’ by requiring self-sufficiency before reproduction (and punishment for reproduction without self-sufficiency).

    Yes, we may have to allow people to separate into communities now that we have BROKEN physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    We broke those laws because of the late 19th and 20th-century pseudoscientific counter-revolution

    against those laws, with the Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminists, and Political Correctness (lying by denying) lies that those laws can be avoided.

    We broke those laws in the past century just like we did in the supernatural counter-revolution against those laws in ancient world by the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim counter-revolution.

    In the ancient world, they blamed the Romans (meaning Europeans) for adaptation to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and they invented the Abrahamic religions to rebel against and destroy the great civilizations of the ancient world – and we had the dark ages.

    And in the 19th and 20th and now 21st centuries they blame Europeans for the discovery and adaptation to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws and invented economic and social pseudoscience, to destroy western civilization once again – and create another dark age. A dark age that is already in its first stages.

    And it is this revolution in evolution, and the counter-revolution against evolution, that is the great battle of human history: once indo-Europeans discovered we could transcend our physical and cognitive limitations by adapting to physical, natural, and evolutionary law, that meant evolution was accelerated – and that some peoples would be left behind. So instead of being left behind by evolution, they undermined the means by which evolution was created: the great civilizations that discovered adapted to, and applied physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    Or in simple terms, the Abrahamic Peoples appeal to women’s nature, and the underclass’s stresses by blaming european people for the laws of nature and nature’s god – thus themselves claiming we are in fact superior. When it is, at least by the evidence, our willingness to adapt to the laws of nature and nature’s god that allows us to produced outcomes superior to that of the rest of the world combined, in but a few hundred years in the ancient and modern worlds.

    The Abrahamic Peoples, and willing Christian accomplices, used our open democracy, the vulnerability of women’s emotions, our flood of pre-war, war-era, and postwar immigrants, European guilt over the nazi positive (aggressive) eugenics program, the plight of the black community, and the mass media, to undermine our demand for integration into natural soft eugenics by the use of markets in everything, the nuclear family, delayed reproduction, our rule of law, limiting our public behavior to manners of ‘church and court’, our limit of public speech to empirical testimony, our truth before face in speech to the public in matters public, and the Christian religion that European protestants transformed into a germanic folk religion of ‘status’ (salvation) by hard work, piety, and social discipline that persisted our integration.

    The Abrahamic peoples this time in pseudoscientific (marxism, socialism, Freudianism, boazianism, pseudomathematics), and lying by sophistry and denial (postmodernism, feminism, and human nature denialism) to destroy western civilization from within as they did every other civilization of the ancient world.

    They did it by selling the false promise (lies) of endless growth and therefore the end of scarcity (heaven on earth), the nature of man (fallen angel), the malleability of man (blank slate) – all cognitive biases of mothers so that they continue to support their children no matter their quality and capability. And the cognitive bias of those who confuse willingness to engage in moral productive behavior is the same as the ability to compete for survival in moral productive behavior. They sold these false promises as oppression by European peoples, rather than the European peoples’ discovery of the means of transcending our animal limits and gaining power over ourselves and nature.

    And they profited in politics from selling these lies from selling interest to enc

    The present political problem is integration – not race, and class – not race. The lower classes must continually shrink in relation to the degree of energy transformation (productivity).

    The people who hate us hate us because THEY are white supremacists and we are not. We are merely scientists trying to solve the problem of the age with political and economic solutions that allow us to help one another in markets without hating each other in politics, and without causing another dark age, as the underclasses led by women’s emotions, destroy our civilization like they have the Romans, Byzantines, Persians, Egyptians, North Africans, and northwest Indians. Those civilizations are dead. And they were made dead by the same means: shouting down the truth, destroying monuments, and undermining traditions.

    Our proposal is ‘love everyone with the truth’ because you’re just generating hate with convenient lies. Many small homogenous communities with low political power distance allow the largest number of people ‘at the top’ and the smallest number ‘at the bottom’ creating the only equality that is possible: among those with similar kinship interests.

    And if some people want to try large urban heterogeneous polities and pay the (very high) costs and consequences of them then that’s fine – but they many not drag us into the same destruction that they have every other people that the Abrahamic system of lying and undermining has touched. It is the human equivalent of civilizational cancer.

    I’m gonna die on the hills of 2) ‘We are in this for mankind: end the globalist project to produce another dark age and destroy our identity, and maintain it by inter-state continuous evolution by competition”, “European civilization is the most advanced in EVERY technology – especially social”. And yes, Europeans – or at least many of us, need to separate and preserve our genetic, normative, traditional, cultural, and institutional advantages until others can ‘catch up’ without dragging us down into another dark age.

    Because that’s the science.

    No more lies. Even to our loving coddle wives, the fears of other women, anxiety teenage girls, and those boys-not-yet-men among us that can not tolerate the truth: we must take responsibility for ourselves, our polity, and mankind if we wish to pass through the second great filter: eugenics.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 10:55:00 UTC

  • PASSING THROUGH THE FIRST GREAT FILTER Discovering, adapting to, and applying th

    PASSING THROUGH THE FIRST GREAT FILTER

    Discovering, adapting to, and applying the Physical laws of nature is empirically and logically best for everyone.

    Adapting to and applying Rule of law of natural law is empirically and logically best for everyone.

    A Monarchical government, with a professional cabinet, with a jury (senate, house) to ascend or veto proposals is empirically and logically the best government under rule of law.

    An Ethnonationalist state because of minimum social, economic, and political competition is empirically and logically the best for everyone.

    Cooperation and Trade Between Rule of Law, Constitutional Monarchical, Ethnoationalist States is best for everyone.

    The purpose of Abrahamic religion, pseudoscience, and sophistry is to destroy eugenic kinship identity and replace it with dysgenic magical identity.

    The purpose of Abrahamic religion, pseudoscience, and sophistry is to use the underclasses and the less developed peoples to destroy the more developed peoples.

    The Europeans alone maintained separation, identity, truth before face, and discovery and conformity to physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    The Chinese forcibly integrate which is why they endure, but could not tolerate truth before face, and failed to pass through the first great filter – although they are adopting western technology an science and it may be possible going forward.

    The Hindus used castes to limit integration and failed to pass through the first great filter.

    Everyone else failed catastrophically to pass through the first great filter and either stagnated or devolved by dysgenia.

    The most influential action any people can take is to force integration into compatibility with physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, to prevent underclass immigration, and to pay the underclasses to have either one or no children (and to punish them if they do). y

    The great lies of the Abrahamic ancient world and the Abrahamic 19th and 20th centuries are revolts against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws: the great lie that we can end natural selection by preventing regression to the mean.

    It will never, ever, ever, end. EVER.

    The Truth is Enough.

    No More Lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 10:34:00 UTC

  • As far as I know, the Flynn effect has reversed, and it was the result of fixing

    As far as I know, the Flynn effect has reversed, and it was the result of fixing the health of the bottom that raised averages; adapting to a few general rules of science, rather than historical many specific rules in each domain; and environmental saturation with those patterns.

    Reply addressees: @AdamJacobsson6 @kenationalist_ @321Traveler @Shahydat @MaMo_ @DNy1818

  • As far as I know, the Flynn effect has reversed, and it was the result of fixing

    As far as I know, the Flynn effect has reversed, and it was the result of fixing the health of the bottom that raised averages; adapting to a few general rules of science, rather than historical many specific rules in each domain; and environmental saturation with those patterns.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-15 18:30:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283468977096859654

    Reply addressees: @AdamJacobsson6 @kenationalist_ @321Traveler @Shahydat @MaMo_ @DNy1818

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283467645778644999