Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods does not make them less wondrous. Understanding mankind does not make us less wondrous. I can simply bear the truth: we are alone but for the simulation of others with us in our minds.
Reply addressees: @sharpentheacts
Theme: Science
-
Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods do
-
Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods do
Understanding the universe does not make it less wondrous. Understanding gods does not make them less wondrous. Understanding mankind does not make us less wondrous. I can simply bear the truth: we are alone but for the simulation of others with us in our minds.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 22:01:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284971660634988544
Reply addressees: @sharpentheacts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284968596486131715
-
Um. What evidence would be needed for the statements I made? Conversely, you are
Um. What evidence would be needed for the statements I made? Conversely, you are welcome to falsify them. Because no amount of confirmatory evidence bears empirical weight, Instead, when all data is collected, that which remains not false must then be true. 😉
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @mpigliucci -
Um. What evidence would be needed for the statements I made? Conversely, you are
Um. What evidence would be needed for the statements I made? Conversely, you are welcome to falsify them. Because no amount of confirmatory evidence bears empirical weight, Instead, when all data is collected, that which remains not false must then be true. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 18:02:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284911498389860352
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @mpigliucci
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284910804945506304
-
Almost anyone who disagrees with me has the following traits (a) read literature
Almost anyone who disagrees with me has the following traits (a) read literature instead of science, (b) philosophy rather than economics (c) is ignorant of law or legal history, (d) has a philosophical rather than neurological understanding of the mind. (e) No life experience.
Reply addressees: @PunishedWoland @LubitzBol -
Almost anyone who disagrees with me has the following traits (a) read literature
Almost anyone who disagrees with me has the following traits (a) read literature instead of science, (b) philosophy rather than economics (c) is ignorant of law or legal history, (d) has a philosophical rather than neurological understanding of the mind. (e) No life experience.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 17:47:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284907808480276480
Reply addressees: @PunishedWoland @LubitzBol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284907030118096898
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PunishedWoland @LubitzBol No one learns anything debating people who agree with you. The problem is finding opposition that disagrees with you that’s (a)intellectually honest (b)knowledgable enough.
Learning grammars(logics), sciences, economics, law, and enough history is rather difficult for any human.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1284907030118096898
-
He stood on the shoulders of many far better men, and Jewish ‘heaping of undue p
He stood on the shoulders of many far better men, and Jewish ‘heaping of undue praise’ has created the ‘Einstein Industry’ as their one and only heroic intellectual example equal to that of Europeans. Hilbert would have solved the problem correctly. Einstein/Bohr set us backward.
Reply addressees: @fritzpure @JanHaugland @phalpern -
He stood on the shoulders of many far better men, and Jewish ‘heaping of undue p
He stood on the shoulders of many far better men, and Jewish ‘heaping of undue praise’ has created the ‘Einstein Industry’ as their one and only heroic intellectual example equal to that of Europeans. Hilbert would have solved the problem correctly. Einstein/Bohr set us backward.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 15:00:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284865686104346626
Reply addressees: @fritzpure @JanHaugland @phalpern
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284864937190477830
-
RT @JanHaugland: @phalpern Just about nobody is willing to state this, but Einst
RT @JanHaugland: @phalpern Just about nobody is willing to state this, but Einstein was a brilliant physicist, but a horrible human being.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-19 14:30:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284858223254810626
-
RT @JanHaugland: @phalpern Just about nobody is willing to state this, but Einst
RT @JanHaugland: @phalpern Just about nobody is willing to state this, but Einstein was a brilliant physicist, but a horrible human being.