Theme: Science

  • AFAIK: Theology (Strategy/Imagination) > Philosophy (Choice/Ideal) > Law(Recipro

    AFAIK: Theology (Strategy/Imagination) > Philosophy (Choice/Ideal) > Law(Reciprocity/Action) > Science (Truth/Testimony)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-27 23:34:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1299128252078977032

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1299127217620951041

  • AFAIK: Theology (Strategy/Imagination) > Philosophy (Choice/Ideal) > Law(Recipro

    AFAIK: Theology (Strategy/Imagination) > Philosophy (Choice/Ideal) > Law(Reciprocity/Action) > Science (Truth/Testimony)

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11

  • ( MORE: … ) THE RESTORATION OF ARISTOTLE The “Recovery of Aristotle” (or Redis

    ( MORE: … )

    THE RESTORATION OF ARISTOTLE
    The “Recovery of Aristotle” (or Rediscovery) refers to the copying or re-translating of most of Aristotle’s books (of ancient Greece), from Greek or Arabic text into Latin, during the Middle Ages, of the Latin West. The Recovery of Aristotle spanned about 100 years, from the middle 12th century into the 13th century, and copied or translated over 42 books (see: Corpus Aristotelicum), The recovery of Aristotle’s texts is considered a major period in medieval philosophy, leading to Aristotelianism. Because some of Aristotle’s newly translated views discounted the notions of a personal God, immortal soul, or creation, various leaders of the Catholic Church were inclined to censor those views for decades, such as lists of forbidden books in the Condemnations of 1210–1277 at the University of Paris.

    In the 4th century, the Roman grammarian Marius Victorinus translated two of Aristotle’s books, about logic, into Latin: the Categories and On Interpretation (De Interpretatione).[2] A little over a century later, most of Aristotle’s logical works, except perhaps for the Posterior Analytics, had been translated by Boethius, c. 510–512[2] (see: Corpus Aristotelicum). However, only Boethius’s translations of the Categories and On Interpretation had entered into general circulation before the 12th century. All in all, only a few major works of Aristotle were never translated into Arabic.[4] Of these, the fate of Politics in particular remains uncertain.[5]

    The rest of Aristotle’s books were eventually translated into Latin, but over 600 years later, from about the middle of the 12th century. First, the rest of the logical works were finished,[1] by using the translations of Boethius as the basis.[6] Then came the Physics, followed by the Metaphysics (12th century), and Averroes’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics (13th century),[3] so that all works were translated by the mid-13th century.[2]
    A text like On the Soul, for instance, was unavailable in Latin in Christian Europe before the middle of the twelfth century.[7] The first Latin translation is due to James of Venice (12th century), and has always been considered as the translatio vetus (ancient translation).[8] The second Latin translation (translatio nova, new translation) was made from the Arabic translation of the text around 1230, and it was accompanied by Averroes’s commentary; the translator is generally thought to be Michael Scot. James’s translatio vetus was then revised by William of Moerbeke in 1266–7, and became known as the “recensio nova” (new recension), which was the most widely read version.[9] On the Soul ended up becoming a component of the core curriculum of philosophical study in most medieval universities, giving birth to a very rich tradition of commentaries, especially c. 1260–1360.[10]

    (MORE … )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 22:36:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104746752160951120

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104746743739200664


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    THE CURRENT COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION IS A REVOLT AGAINST THE PHYSICAL, NATURAL, AND EVOLUTIONARY LAWS. 1) The enlightenment in every country and culture was a counter-revolution against anglo empiricism – other peoples simply couldn’t function as did the English, any more than others could function as did the Greek and Roman. 2) We are currently going through the Jewish counter-enlightenment against science. The difference is that while the Jewish and Chinese and Russian, and Indian revolutions all occurred at the same time, the Jewish revolution is within and we are paying the cost of it due to their excellence at verbal exposition. 3) We frame history as the enlightenment and the industrial revolution, but that’s false. We had the Aristotelian restoration in 1200, the printing press and literacy 1450, Constantinople was defeated in 1402, but not occupied until 1453 so the 1453 date describes the last vestige not a dramatic turn. Instead, there is a rapid restoration of Europe from the pure of Islam from Spain, the restoration of Aristotle, restoration of trade, restoration of literacy, to the age of sail, the agrarian revolution, the financial and commercial (merchantile) revolution, the expansion of empirical rule of law, the scientific revolution, culminating in the industrial revolution, the technological revolution, the biological revolution. What I find terrifying is that if Athens and Sparta had not gone to war with one another as Germany and England went to war with one another, that we very likely would have had the industrial revolution by the 3d century AD. And never had a Semitic dark age. (MORE…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104746743739200664

  • THE CURRENT COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION IS A REVOLT AGAINST

    THE CURRENT COUNTER-REVOLUTION AGAINST EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION IS A REVOLT AGAINST THE PHYSICAL, NATURAL, AND EVOLUTIONARY LAWS.

    1) The enlightenment in every country and culture was a counter-revolution against anglo empiricism – other peoples simply couldn’t function as did the English, any more than others could function as did the Greek and Roman.

    2) We are currently going through the Jewish counter-enlightenment against science. The difference is that while the Jewish and Chinese and Russian, and Indian revolutions all occurred at the same time, the Jewish revolution is within and we are paying the cost of it due to their excellence at verbal exposition.

    3) We frame history as the enlightenment and the industrial revolution, but that’s false. We had the Aristotelian restoration in 1200, the printing press and literacy 1450, Constantinople was defeated in 1402, but not occupied until 1453 so the 1453 date describes the last vestige not a dramatic turn.

    Instead, there is a rapid restoration of Europe from the pure of Islam from Spain, the restoration of Aristotle, restoration of trade, restoration of literacy, to the age of sail, the agrarian revolution, the financial and commercial (merchantile) revolution, the expansion of empirical rule of law, the scientific revolution, culminating in the industrial revolution, the technological revolution, the biological revolution.

    What I find terrifying is that if Athens and Sparta had not gone to war with one another as Germany and England went to war with one another, that we very likely would have had the industrial revolution by the 3d century AD. And never had a Semitic dark age.

    (MORE…)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 22:34:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104746743739200664

  • There is no difference between say, einstein’s gravity, math and elevators, and

    … There is no difference between say, einstein’s gravity, math and elevators, and my acquisition, operations, and actions. Same process Math(physics), Programming, and Reciprocity (actions).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-22 20:10:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1297264920883601408

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1297264775517347841


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 (PS: I don’t always understand me either. Imagine you’re trying to do a mathematical proof, and you try something only to discover something else. You discover that you just intuited something smart, and wrote it down, and afterward discovering the depth of it. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1297264775517347841

  • There is no difference between say, einstein’s gravity, math and elevators, and

    … There is no difference between say, einstein’s gravity, math and elevators, and my acquisition, operations, and actions. Same process Math(physics), Programming, and Reciprocity (actions).

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

  • Market systems calculate like physical and biological systems. They calculate th

    Market systems calculate like physical and biological systems. They calculate the defeat of entropy – or at least self-replication by the capture of its energy. Language assists in negotiating calculations. That’s all we do: massive parallel computation of by trial and error.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-21 18:27:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1296876477414334466

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1296786299098214400

  • Market systems calculate like physical and biological systems. They calculate th

    Market systems calculate like physical and biological systems. They calculate the defeat of entropy – or at least self-replication by the capture of its energy. Language assists in negotiating calculations. That’s all we do: massive parallel computation of by trial and error.

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

  • @charlieprime The P-Movement can’t fail. P-Logic and P-Law are simply science. T

    @charlieprime

    The P-Movement can’t fail. P-Logic and P-Law are simply science. The science will endure like all other sciences. Eventually, everyone will learn P-logic and P-law at least in social sciences of economics and law, and possibly in psychology and sociology.

    Now, the constitutional solution and policies would end the Jewish organized crimes against our people, and prevent a second dark age. They would restore our people to power. And let us use that power to incrementally restore ourselves. The strategy of showing up in numbers, issuing moral demands, with the threat of turning a revolution hot would control the public dialog, bait Antifa and the rest of the enemy into conflict on our terms, and create public demand for settlement. That ‘influence’ would radically increase our numbers, until the outcome was deterministically in our favor.

    You (The Dissident-right) can fail to make use of those techniques. I can only fail to educate you in them. And you don’t appear to be educable – our attempt to provide a solution to the right failed – like every other attempt has failed. This is why you’ve been abandoned, discarded, left behind, and don’t have leaders, thought leaders, or elites, are a minority in school age, and within eight years be a minority in electoral age. Then they will gradually exterminate you and yours. Meanwhile, we 1%ers will be just fine thank you.

    Our experiment of trying to make an intellectual and political movement out of white trash was interesting – but we can’t make an intellectual movement for anti-intellectuals, and we can’t make a political movement for anti-politicals, and we can’t make a social movement for anti-socials, you can’t get sacrifice from the ‘white privileged working and laboring class’ or the Virtue signaling Christians, and you can’t ask for courage from paranoid cowards

    The left will always adapt faster. The left will always organize faster. The left will always use superior numbers. The left will always win optics. The left will always empower the state. Because they have a plausible moral high ground as long as you live and breathe. So they seek to (and will) end your living and breathing just like south Africa.

    The only way to win is to take the moral high ground and defend it with violence. You can’t bear the optics of taking the moral high ground, and you can’t bear the cost of showing up to fight. So you’re dead weight. Like I said. Cowards hiding behind Keyboard Bravado and Purity-Spirals.

    So I just do my job, casting pearls before swine. In the hope, that like Aristotle, I can benefit future generations – if there ever are any. 😉

    And I have no problem sweating my balls off or pandering to the enemy in the meantime. I show up.

    You manginas can’t even show. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-19 17:45:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104717295755729682

  • @charlieprime P-movement can’t ‘fail’. P-Logic and P-Law are simply science. The

    @charlieprime P-movement can’t ‘fail’. P-Logic and P-Law are simply science. The constitutional solution is and policies would end the jewish organized crimes against our people. They would restore our people to power. And let us use that power to incrementally restore ourselves. The strategy of showing up in numbers, issuing moral demands, with the threat of turning hot would control the public dialog, bait antifa and the rest of the enemy onto our terms, and create public demand for settlement. That ‘influence’ would radically increase our numbers.

    You can fail to make use of those techniques. I can only fail to educate you in them. And you don’t appear to be educable. Which is why you’ve been abandoned, discarded, left behind, and don’t have leaders, thought leaders, or elites, are a minority in school age, and within eight years be a minority in electoral age. Then they will gradually exterminate you and yours. Meanwhile, us 1%ers will be just fine thank you.

    I won’t pander to you. If you’re too stupid to follow this plan then find someone with a better one, and I’ll do my job for posterity. What? There aren’t any? Oh. Yeah. You forgot that. Right? 😉

    Our experiment of trying to make an intellectual and political movement out of white trash was interesting – but we can’t make an intellectual movement for anti-intellectuals, and we can’t make a political movement for anti-politicals, and we can’t make a social movement for anti-socials, you can’t get sacrifice from the ‘white privileged working and laboring class’ or the Virtue signaling Christians, and you can’t ask for courage from paranoid cowards

    The left will always adapt faster. The left will always organize faster. The left will always use superior numbers. The left will always win optics. The left will awlays empower the state. Because they have a plausible moral high ground as long as you live and breathe. SO they seek to (and will) end your living and breathing just like south africa.

    The only way to win is to take the moral high ground, and defend it with violence. You can’t bear the optics of taking the moral high ground, and you can’t bear the cost of showing up to fight. So you’re dead weight.

    Like I said. Cowards hiding behind Purity-Spirals.

    So I just do my job, casting pearls before swine. In the hope, that like Aristotle, I can benefit future generations – if there ever are any. 😉

    And I have no problem sweating my balls off or pandering to the enemy in the meantime. I show up.

    You can’t even show up. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-19 17:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104717243218700242