Theme: Science

  • 4. The rate of adaptation requires a homogenous population sufficient to CULL de

    4. The rate of adaptation requires a homogenous population sufficient to CULL defects and express benefits. Populations need to be small. And the benefits to humans post homo-erectus have all been the same, because gains from cooperation and tools aren’t biologically available.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 22:41:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321582958646599687

    Reply addressees: @RonNoble7

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321581944526831616


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @RonNoble7 3. –“Richard Lewontin’s 1972 study…”— We call it “Lewontin’s Fallacy” for a reason. It certainly appears we understand the evolutionary direction and how little has to be changed in order to achieve it. GENETIC DIVERSITY HINDERS IT. Separation > speciation > rehybridization.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321581944526831616

  • 3. –“Richard Lewontin’s 1972 study…”— We call it “Lewontin’s Fallacy” for a

    3. –“Richard Lewontin’s 1972 study…”— We call it “Lewontin’s Fallacy” for a reason. It certainly appears we understand the evolutionary direction and how little has to be changed in order to achieve it. GENETIC DIVERSITY HINDERS IT. Separation > speciation > rehybridization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 22:37:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321581944526831616

    Reply addressees: @RonNoble7

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321581423036407808


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @RonNoble7 2. –“race is a social construct and thus a poor proxy for genetic diversity.”– Species is not a social construct but a mating preference. While humans are opportunistic (see sheep), we are unable to truthfully discuss the human mating preference spectrum, despite the data.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321581423036407808

  • 2. –“race is a social construct and thus a poor proxy for genetic diversity.”–

    2. –“race is a social construct and thus a poor proxy for genetic diversity.”– Species is not a social construct but a mating preference. While humans are opportunistic (see sheep), we are unable to truthfully discuss the human mating preference spectrum, despite the data.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 22:35:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321581423036407808

    Reply addressees: @RonNoble7

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321580909284511744


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @RonNoble7 Response to @RonNoble7 Thread

    1. “Is race a reliable proxy for genetic diversity?” This statement implies a cause and consequent. It certainly appears that despite worldwide genetic diversity its a tiny fraction that’s providing increases in rates of evolutionary adaptation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321580909284511744

  • Response to @RonNoble7 Thread 1. “Is race a reliable proxy for genetic diversity

    Response to @RonNoble7 Thread

    1. “Is race a reliable proxy for genetic diversity?” This statement implies a cause and consequent. It certainly appears that despite worldwide genetic diversity its a tiny fraction that’s providing increases in rates of evolutionary adaptation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 22:33:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321580909284511744

    Reply addressees: @RonNoble7

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321261224076738560

  • @Rhodok Sorry. I’ve read this twice and I”m not still shure I understand what yo

    @Rhodok Sorry. I’ve read this twice and I”m not still shure I understand what you’re saying. I think you mean that the correlation in the drop in R0 is what, shutdown? The data i’m seeing directly from cdc et all, is that (a) it’s almost exclusively transmitted at home (b) the risk is almost exclusively over 60, it’s almost entirely through the health, eldercare industry, and (d) disproportionately affects people with ‘bad lifestyle habits’. So rather than regulating and punishing the hell out of violators, and prohibiting gatherings, the idea that we need to shut down the economy or even wear masks is rather ideological rather than empirical, and in suppport of political agendas rather than empirical management of the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 17:08:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105113513978318115

  • (Please don’t try to make an argument by a news article that doesn’t support the

    (Please don’t try to make an argument by a news article that doesn’t support the claim it makes. sigh. I do science. pop. IMO the developmental argument still stands. Regardless of causality. I can’t find anything to falsify it.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 18:07:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321151534126780420

    Reply addressees: @Hugo_Potamus @autismcrisis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319200729538711552

  • 4) The Germanic Europeans were the only people to tolerate the truth of the logi

    4) The Germanic Europeans were the only people to tolerate the truth of the logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – sedating themselves with exhaustive Christian forgiveness of one another. The anglos the only to survive the Napoleonic destruction of Germanic Civ.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 15:05:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105634784432129

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105632674615296


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    3 The Jews sought to maintain separatism, to maintain strategy of unity through undermining hosts, with false promise of utopias – transforming selling their ‘big lies’ of the supernatural ancient world, with ‘big lies’ of the pseudoscientific modern world as method of sedition.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321105632674615296

  • Countering Anti White Trolls

    You’re an idiot. Primates are WHITE. Black skin was an adaptation to losing our hair. We lost hair so we could dissipate heat, and run and hunt animals by thermal exhaustion – not bravery. White skin an adaptation to wearing clothes. UV kills natal chemistry. So there is a natural equilibrium between sun exposure near intense solar radiation (central Africa) and cold climates. Cold climates force civilized behavior, long term planning, which is produced by neoteny – slowing the rate of gestation and maturation so that cognitive agency can develop. This and cold allow for larger craniums with denser neurology while maintaining heat dissipation. East asians are more neotenized than whites – at a cost. Whites (European whites) are the ‘newest race’ and emerged just 20k years ago in northern Eurasia, and moved westward as the Asians moved north and eastward. Europeans in present form are only 5000 years old – the result of the intersection of hunter gatherers, anatolian neolithic farmers, various people in eastern europe, and the invention of the steppe culture which let us bypass the religion and state stage and leapfrog to the development rule of law. This rule of law caused depenence on empirical thinking in the population. Debate in court caused empirical argument. This resulted in reason science, and the second european miracle of mediterranean age. Ther estoration of this empirical thinking from 1000 onward resulted in the restoration of european leadership in dragging mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease suffering, and early daeth. So yea, whites are genetically superior, culturally superior – but that doesn’t mean other people can’t just copy our social political and intellectual tech. Or rather, it means if your people are sufficiently domesticated they can’. Yours probably can’t. At least no more than ten or twenty percent of them. Deal with it. Peterson says fix your room. I say fix your civilization. And fix your civilization by fixing your gene pool. Don’t blame others because you failed.

  • Countering Anti White Trolls

    You’re an idiot. Primates are WHITE. Black skin was an adaptation to losing our hair. We lost hair so we could dissipate heat, and run and hunt animals by thermal exhaustion – not bravery. White skin an adaptation to wearing clothes. UV kills natal chemistry. So there is a natural equilibrium between sun exposure near intense solar radiation (central Africa) and cold climates. Cold climates force civilized behavior, long term planning, which is produced by neoteny – slowing the rate of gestation and maturation so that cognitive agency can develop. This and cold allow for larger craniums with denser neurology while maintaining heat dissipation. East asians are more neotenized than whites – at a cost. Whites (European whites) are the ‘newest race’ and emerged just 20k years ago in northern Eurasia, and moved westward as the Asians moved north and eastward. Europeans in present form are only 5000 years old – the result of the intersection of hunter gatherers, anatolian neolithic farmers, various people in eastern europe, and the invention of the steppe culture which let us bypass the religion and state stage and leapfrog to the development rule of law. This rule of law caused depenence on empirical thinking in the population. Debate in court caused empirical argument. This resulted in reason science, and the second european miracle of mediterranean age. Ther estoration of this empirical thinking from 1000 onward resulted in the restoration of european leadership in dragging mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease suffering, and early daeth. So yea, whites are genetically superior, culturally superior – but that doesn’t mean other people can’t just copy our social political and intellectual tech. Or rather, it means if your people are sufficiently domesticated they can’. Yours probably can’t. At least no more than ten or twenty percent of them. Deal with it. Peterson says fix your room. I say fix your civilization. And fix your civilization by fixing your gene pool. Don’t blame others because you failed.

  • 1) Analogistically, the universe calculates possibilities for the defeat of entr

    1) Analogistically, the universe calculates possibilities for the defeat of entropy by trial and error, using a tiny number of operations,a small number of types, larger of states, in massive parallel. The brain extends this analogy.into sequences. The computer into algorithms.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 07:42:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319907148177022976

    Reply addressees: @VitalikButerin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319890561361268737