3. –“Richard Lewontin’s 1972 study…”— We call it “Lewontin’s Fallacy” for a

3. –“Richard Lewontin’s 1972 study…”— We call it “Lewontin’s Fallacy” for a reason. It certainly appears we understand the evolutionary direction and how little has to be changed in order to achieve it. GENETIC DIVERSITY HINDERS IT. Separation > speciation > rehybridization.


Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 22:37:44 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321581944526831616

Reply addressees: @RonNoble7

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321581423036407808


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@RonNoble7 2. –“race is a social construct and thus a poor proxy for genetic diversity.”– Species is not a social construct but a mating preference. While humans are opportunistic (see sheep), we are unable to truthfully discuss the human mating preference spectrum, despite the data.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321581423036407808

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *