Theme: Science

I did explain the facts. 😉 I explained LAWS of nature and why they are involabl

I did explain the facts. 😉 I explained LAWS of nature and why they are involable.
I think you’re parroting someone who taught you something you don’t understand. It’s common for midwits to find ONE thing to obsess over, rather than keep restarting the learning curve to learn…

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-25 23:21:09 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629622558642393088

Reply addressees: @Max_Aragorn @chedetofficial

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629620752868864002

February 25, 2023
TEchnically I am not a rationalist. I’m an empiricist, and operationalist, which

TEchnically I am not a rationalist. I’m an empiricist, and operationalist, which means I’m a scientist and logician. But you’d need quite a bit of knowledge to understand that computation is the end result of the myth, religion, philosophy, empiricism, science, logic, spectrum.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 22:11:01 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629242522760257538

Reply addressees: @freeusefulinfo @BussySmeller2

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629239844143505412

February 24, 2023
I’d suspect so. Hard to imagine not. I just don’t have even one paper that has t

I’d suspect so. Hard to imagine not. I just don’t have even one paper that has that data. (shouldn’t be horrifically hard to figure out tho.)

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 10:50:10 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629071179490250753

Reply addressees: @gillisisgod @HannahDCox

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629065356613681152

February 24, 2023
No. As for science and tech, I’m pretty much narrowed down to interests in AI (e

No. As for science and tech, I’m pretty much narrowed down to interests in AI (esp hardware), Energy, artificial muscles, any possible revolution in materials science, and the problem of mathiness in mathematical physics.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 03:55:17 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628966772110917632

Reply addressees: @miner49er236

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628965094640984064

February 24, 2023
I just do the science, and the law, and seek for peaceful reciprocal cooperation

I just do the science, and the law, and seek for peaceful reciprocal cooperation. You cannot have peaceful reciprocal cooperation with people who hate you and lie to you and want to end you. Notice that you avoided the truth, an distract from it, and then you accuse and lie, and therefore it is impossible to have peaceful reciprocal cooperation. So there are only two choices: boycott (separate), or conflict-and-war. Given you refuse peaceful reciprocal cooperation, do you choose separation or war?

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 02:55:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628951622389727233

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628950977364500481

February 24, 2023
That’s very impassioned. It’s also untestifiable pretense of knowledge

That’s very impassioned. It’s also untestifiable pretense of knowledge.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-24 00:11:50 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628910535453429762

Reply addressees: @zwingli_head @NeoUnrealist @whatifalthist

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628909794437259264

February 24, 2023
Communsim was a reaction to the anglo invesntion of the modern state, and the co

Communsim was a reaction to the anglo invesntion of the modern state, and the consequence in the sequence of revolutions culminating in the industrial and scientific.

It was a doubling down on the feminine means of warfare, using the abrahamic means of undermining meritocracy, loyalty, hierarchy, aristocracy, reason, evidence, rule of law, and testimony.

HOwever, communism was a sick disease even worse than the jewish-christian-muslim means by which the seven civlizations of the ancient world were reduced to ignorance and decay.

SO while communism was a reaction – it was a sick, deceptive, and evil reaction, to anglo liberalism and french democratic socialism, and naziism was the correction to communism, restoring nationalism, and hierarchy, and loyalty, and meritocracy.

So your argumetn presents af alse dichotomy between equals rather than a means of warfare against evil warfare.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 20:50:45 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628859932257792001

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628855859966095362

February 23, 2023
There are quite a few of us who notice that we have imported and exhausted the g

There are quite a few of us who notice that we have imported and exhausted the german’s second industsrial and scientific revolution.

The rest dont notice, don’t want to, won’t no matter what, and instead will deny it, or try to refute it.

I’ve done quite a but of work on what went wrong, but it’s so deep so subtle and so hard for normies to comprehend that too few could understand it if they tried.

But for those of us who understand langauge, group differences in metaphysical presumptions and biases, and domain specific languages that can be affected by them – it’s rather obvious. And once you see it you can’t unsee it.

The point of my work is to reverse it. That isn’t going to happen without legal, institutional, and academic reform. So the problem in the end is political – obtaining power to criminalize the destruction of the human mind.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 19:26:08 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628838639655321605

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628834092002299907

February 23, 2023
Maybe you should read the body of research on the subject instead of thinking wi

Maybe you should read the body of research on the subject instead of thinking without doing so. And maybe you should ask yourself before hand, why england could and did make due without slaves and serfs.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 15:45:09 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628783026871074818

Reply addressees: @Jake385719 @TheAutistocrat @whatifalthist

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628781501436530688

February 23, 2023
A SECRET? If you study the ‘science’ of human lying, and have a basic understand

A SECRET?
If you study the ‘science’ of human lying, and have a basic understanding of statistics, it’s relatively easy to separate good research from bad – not because you understand the research (although that helps a lot) but because you can identify the untestifiable: lying.
The COVID fiasco produces volumes of noise but almost NO signal (useful research). No small part of the blame goes to the media for lying about the research for clicks and eyeballs. And a lot of the blame goes to the people who have no business interpreting research an spinning it for their purposes.
So, because we don’t know how to identify lying, very few people can judge the veracity of research they falsely call ‘science’.
And again, I’d like to repeat, it’s not ‘Science’ until it’s survived market falsification. Until then it’s just Research. And sometimes, it’s not even that.
You don’t trust the research. You trust settled science. And that takes time.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 23:50:25 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628542761887571968

February 22, 2023