Theme: Science

  • Q: “WHAT ABOUT: OUR BRAINS ARE SMALLER THAN OUR DISTANT ANCESTORS?” Domesticatio

    Q: “WHAT ABOUT: OUR BRAINS ARE SMALLER THAN OUR DISTANT ANCESTORS?”
    Domestication syndrome. Not clear that there is a difference in brain contents neurons or neural density. Appears that aggression and persistence produce larger brains (energy?) while domestication and agency produce smaller brains (energy?).
    Given IQ differences appear to be dependent on neoteny, and the ratio of head to body, it’s not clear that there is any difference between our ancestors and us.
    But…
    Who is smarter, wolf or dog? Dogs.
    Why? Neoteny.
    We are probably smarter than those ancestors.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 04:19:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630422458573488133

  • As you know, as long as my work helps anyone, that’s fine with me. Science is wh

    As you know, as long as my work helps anyone, that’s fine with me. Science is what it is. P-Method is technology. Science and the method and I don’t care about applied science. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 02:55:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630401179569078272

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630400491824840704

  • In mathematics, just as division by zero is a problem, infinity is a problem. We

    In mathematics, just as division by zero is a problem, infinity is a problem. We have a symbol for infinity, but not one for division by zero (which is effectively the same thing.) So infinity either means “error”, “I dunno”, or “undefined limit”.
    Part of the problem if not the cause of the problem is the foundation of mathematics in set theory(idealism) rather than operational computation (realism).
    The dam**ed consequences of that screw-up caused the loss of analytic philosophy that crashed in the 20th century.
    I blame Babbage for not writing papers and generalizing the theory instead of trying to make bigger computers.
    The result was cantor-einstein-bohr’s re-mystification of mathematics, and today’s physics lost in mathiness.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 02:32:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630395474162114561

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630393847342571525

  • Q: “YOU CAN’T CRITICIZE ABSTRACT IDEAS LIKE INFINITY!” I understand your positio

    Q: “YOU CAN’T CRITICIZE ABSTRACT IDEAS LIKE INFINITY!”
    I understand your position. But you’re wrong. And you’re wrong because no infinities are existentially possible. The error originates like many errors in philosophy from a failure to understand mathematics. As such infinity is a mathematical concept (mathematical platonism) given that mathematics is context(reference), scale and operation(time, sequence) independent, (we remove the constraint of correspondence from mathematical language), and a logic of positional names (we remove scale and limits from correspondence), and time and operationally independent (no sequence of operations in time) and as a consequence requires arbitrary definition of limits. For example, we are conscious of the minimum scale of the quantum background, and as such, there is a relatively simple limit of 1.6x-10^35 or so (I might be mis-remembering) for scale. (at least until we get into the dipoles and polarity of the quantum background.). So for example, in Cantor’s ‘infinities,’ this is just a fantasy. Instead of infinities of different sizes, any set of operations will produce results at different rates – thus restoring time and sequence. So whenever we discuss reality we must ask ourselves what dimensions are we removing from limiting us to identity, consistency, constructability, correspondence, limits, full accounting, and coherence. all the fictionalisms (pseudoscience so to speak) whether supernatural-theological, sophistry-philosophy, magic-pseudoscience, and textualism-innumeracy, all require we subtract dimensions of reality and tests of possibility in order to construct our analogies – or our lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 23:00:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630342171084595206

  • WHY DOES SCIENCE ‘GO WRONG’? (or anything else for that matter) Do you understan

    WHY DOES SCIENCE ‘GO WRONG’?
    (or anything else for that matter)
    Do you understand where mathematics and physics ‘went wrong’ and why?

    Well I do.

    But then, that’s my occupational specialization. And the re-introduction of magical thinking has led to stagnation in those fields, and it spread to other fields, because math and physics are no longer the gold standard of epistemology precisely because they ‘went wrong’.

    To study truth, I study lying. If you know how people lie, you know why they can. If you know why people can lie, then you know why people are vulnerable to lies. If you know how people are vulnerable to lying, you know why people can lie to themselves, and why they engage in ignorance, error, and bias as well: because they are vulnerable to it.

    And once you know the cause of that vulnerability is the bias to obtain discounts on every want or need, conscious or unconscious, you also know why people bias toward ignorance, error, bias, fiction, fictionalisms, fraud, denial, undermining, projection, social construction, and canceling. Because we evolved to negotiate on behalf of our genes.

    We only discovered ‘truth’ because it was necessary to cooperate at political scale, and resolve differences to do so. So error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fiction, fictionalisms, frauds, denial, undermining et all, are natural to man. Truth is unnatural. That’s why it’s difficult.

    -Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 22:17:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630331211435343872

  • (Humor)(Sarcasm) THE CREDENTIALED INCOMPETENT – Dimwit > Nitwit > Midwit – Commu

    (Humor)(Sarcasm)
    THE CREDENTIALED INCOMPETENT
    – Dimwit > Nitwit > Midwit
    – Communitard >Libtard >Libertard >Conservatard
    – Pseudoscientard >Psycholotard >Socialscientard
    – Credential-tard > Politard > Elitetard
    ( Great hierarchy. 😉 )

    CAUSALITY
    The postwar conversion of anglo meritocracy by demonstrated competency in industry and military and the rule of law state, with the managerial state, using the demonstrated incompetent credentialed incompetents, and the pseudoscientific revolt against the Darwinian explanation for all of existence from the first principle of the universe to the most complex of human endeavors.

    Painful Truth: the Jewish elites, of superior verbal talent and internal loyalty, seeking undermining of western civilization replaced the anglo elites demonstrating superior material skill, and loyalty to western civilization in enough numbers to perform a capture of western institutions as the supernatural clerisy replaced the aristocracy in the Roman era.

    FOOL ME ONCE SHAME ON YOU, FOOL ME TWICE?
    This process repeats the destruction of the classical world by the Jewish Christian destruction of Mediterranean culture. Replacing empirical military order with supernatural (now pseudoscientific) clerical order.

    WHO IS TO BLAME?
    Do we blame women for their nature? Why should we blame Jews for their nature (culture)? Or are we to blame for not regulating the anti-social, criminal, seditious and treasonous means of warfare against the institutions of western civilization?

    One demonstrates morality and competency or not.
    So, the man in the mirror is always to blame.
    Otherwise, he is a fool who blames others.
    And is their victim.

    REPAIRING THE DAMAGE
    We can fix the holes in the constitution and our law and suppress the feminine means of antisocial, criminal, seditious, and treasonous warfare as thoroughly as we have suppressed the male antisocial, criminal, seditious, and treasonous warfare.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 21:11:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630314650687483904

  • (Evidence of P-Method) You can observe that our methodology (P: P-Method, P-logi

    (Evidence of P-Method)
    You can observe that our methodology (P: P-Method, P-logic, P-Science, P-law) is successful in producing universal commensurability (paradigm, vocabulary, logic, and grammar across all domains), by observing the consistency of writing (proofs) of the people who have mastered it. We all hold slightly different preferences but we all argue by universally consistent logic. What you might eventually notice is that we’re all using the same standard of measurement: What is the deviation from first principles?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 16:08:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630238326635593730

  • Predictability decreases over time, population, and sequence of actions. So, is

    Predictability decreases over time, population, and sequence of actions. So, is it true that we have lost that illusion? Or, like gravity do we just incrementally comprehend it with greater precision changing our perception of that illusion?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 04:01:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630055467270512640

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays @elonmusk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629918062886682624

  • You err. We taught reason. Empiricism. Science. Natural Law. Everyone else stagn

    You err.
    We taught reason. Empiricism. Science. Natural Law.
    Everyone else stagnated and declined by 800ad.
    Only Europeans recovered from the age of rebellion against reason: the religions of the primitive world.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 17:04:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629890244467146754

    Reply addressees: @FouziaEjaz1 @chedetofficial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629870421901230082

  • (laments) I have days where I think our struggle to prevent the left from bringi

    (laments)
    I have days where I think our struggle to prevent the left from bringing about the present dark age thru pseudoscience just as they brought about the last dark age through theology, is fruitless – because their use of incrementalism replaces generations without creating any trigger event that causes the right to fully rebel, revolt, and reform the cancer of the left. But then I have other days where moral conviction compels me to complete my project, so that if that trigger event happens, the dark age can be avoided by the restoration of the western tradition of responsibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-26 14:51:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1629856630513840130