Theme: Science

  • There are no inter-dimensions. It won’t make sense if I try to explain it, but t

    There are no inter-dimensions.
    It won’t make sense if I try to explain it, but there are reasons there are only three spatial and one temporal dimension. Nothing else is possible or ever will be.
    As for the word itself.
    A dimension means a measurement.
    It requires three measurements to describe space.
    It requires a fourth to describe change (time)
    When nitwits talk about 11 dimensions that does not mean 11 spatial dimensions exist. It means it takes eleven measurements of causality to describe a behavior.
    Most of these people are telling pseudoscience fiction for entertainment purposes the same way women go to fortue tellers and card readers. That’s all. It’s fun. But like horoscopes it’s just entertainment.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 03:06:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634390283860279296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634385695207997440

  • Nerd Food: Large scale study of Denomination vs IQ. Just what you’d expect reall

    Nerd Food:
    Large scale study of Denomination vs IQ.
    Just what you’d expect really.
    This one is from… I think 09? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1634382370911469568

  • Nerds study everything imaginable. I don’t want to go look for it, but I’m posit

    Nerds study everything imaginable.
    I don’t want to go look for it, but I’m positive I have the graph saved to a disk somewhere. … Lemme see. Nope. Lets Google. Yep…. Easy. Here is a large one published in discovery magazine: https://t.co/YT8LQURFk6


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 02:34:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634382370911469568

    Reply addressees: @KaiserSoso1 @KennyCHAOS363

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634379201661870082

  • Involved? No. Visit us? Very Unlikely. Possibly impossible. Exist? Probably. Mor

    Involved? No.
    Visit us? Very Unlikely. Possibly impossible.
    Exist? Probably. More rare than we imagine. But almost certain.
    Can we ever discover them? We dunno yet. Possibly not.

    Do I wish? Yes to all of the above. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 02:07:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634375385856061440

    Reply addressees: @ScottClaremonty

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634371207742238720

  • RT @D__2__3: Put a bookmark in this. I’d suggest that most of the habitat and wi

    RT @D__2__3: Put a bookmark in this.

    I’d suggest that most of the habitat and wildlife destruction shown can actually be attributed to ove…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:30:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634320762818506753

  • CORRECT ANSWER When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it bene

    CORRECT ANSWER
    When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it benefitted all of us.
    Like everything in the world: mass markets, like mass democracy seek the bottom of the stimulation pyramid.
    Why? Because “Brains seek stimulation by novelty by the means comprehensible.”
    So, put basal stimuli in children’s hands and that’s what you get.
    Put mass communication in the hands of nitwits and they’ll gossip about ‘simple folks talk about people, less simple folks talk about events, and not simple folks talk about ideas and are bad at it, and very not simple folks falsify ideas and invent new ones, some of which aren’t bad.
    It’s not complicated.

    Reply addressees: @pmarca


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:57:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634297535471779840

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634118284827312129

  • CORRECT ANSWER When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it bene

    CORRECT ANSWER
    When the internet was limited to scientists and engineers it benefitted all of us.
    Like everything in the world: mass markets, like mass democracy seek the bottom of the stimulation pyramid.
    Why? Because “Brains seek stimulation by novelty by the means comprehensible.”
    So, put basal stimuli in children’s hands and that’s what you get.
    Put mass communication in the hands of nitwits and they’ll gossip about ‘simple folks talk about people, less simple folks talk about events, and not simple folks talk about ideas and are bad at it, and very not simple folks falsify ideas and invent new ones, some of which aren’t bad.
    It’s not complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:57:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634297535597535238

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634118284827312129

  • Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove

    Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove it.

    Why do people (women in particular) have so much trouble believing it? Well, there are a lot of reasons.

    But mostly there is a sort of obvious evolutionary law necessary for all animal survival at play: your competence or incompetence needs to matter so little that the child will mature, survive and reproduce regardless of your competency.

    So, you can screw up your kids, you can make life harder or easier. But over the course of one’s life – GENES ALWAYS EXPRESS. Why? A child is sharing your prefrontal cortex so to speak. When mature and away from you the child isn’t. Genes always express. Always.

    Just is what it is.
    🙁

    Reply addressees: @Barbarian_Brain @AeoliumTweets @datepsych


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:10:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634285729231654922

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634284351981604970

  • Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove

    Unfortulately you’re wrong. And we. have a vast corpus of twin studies to prove it.

    Why do people (women in particular) have so much trouble believing it? Well, there are a lot of reasons.

    But mostly there is a sort of obvious evolutionary law necessary for all animal survival at play: your competence or incompetence needs to matter so little that the child will mature, survive and reproduce regardless of your competency.

    So, you can screw up your kids, you can make life harder or easier. But over the course of one’s life – GENES ALWAYS EXPRESS. Why? A child is sharing your prefrontal cortex so to speak. When mature and away from you the child isn’t. Genes always express. Always.

    Just is what it is.
    🙁


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 20:10:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634285729378455571

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634284351981604970

  • (Repost from 2021) THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH (behavioral science

    (Repost from 2021)
    THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH
    (behavioral science via social media: the endless supply of test subjects and zero cost of experimentation.)

    1) The reason I generated so much hate, and was framed as someone with hate, is the result of my exhaustive application of the scientific method. Why? Popper. “Sources of Knowledge and Ignorance”, and Critical Rationalism: research the greatest returns.

    2) What falsehoods contain the greatest opportunity because they provide the greatest source of ignorance: The SACRED and the CONVENTIONAL and the TABOO. So I used exhaustive adversarial falsification of the sacred, conventional, and taboo.

    3) The internet provided a new research opportunity that before was impossible to afford. However, using the internet like using any other method of surveys, relies on self-reporting. Self-reporting is always biased and false. So how do we get people to speak truthfully? Conflict.

    4) So I developed King Of The Hill Games to generate conflict. I would assert statements that would bait people into conflict. And I’d attack the same sacred, convention, or taboo from multiple angles multiple times. This caused moral panic and attracted large numbers of people.

    5) The secret is to ‘exhaust the conversation’ because it is only just before people give up. When they are exhausted. When they are desperate, but still in moral panic, they expose their most reductive -most truthful – intuitions.

    6) The method you use to exhaust their dishonesty, particularly with those in moral panic, who then use GSRRM to disapprove, shame, ad hom, lie, evade, and deny, is to reflect their insult, and then restate the central argument. It’s painfully time-consuming. That’s why it’s hard.

    7) This strategy was extremely successful even among people who understood what I was doing. It also makes people hate you like they (can) hate therapists and (do) prosecutors.

    8) So in one’s search for truth it’s a brutally unpleasant method of circumventing the sacred, conventional, and taboo, in order to discover the first principles that cause us to avoid inquiry into the sacred, conventional, and the taboo. The abyss in the mirror gazes back.

    9) However, as we can see, by eliminating these sources of ignorance, we discover those first principles, that allow us to see what had henceforth been obscured. And in doing so discover how to solve the great problems of the day.

    10) It’s painful. It makes people hate you. It makes people avoid you. But in the end, if you deliver them from evil, by that work, you can often be tolerated if not quite forgiven. 😉

    At least sometimes. 😉

    -Curt Doolittle
    -The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 19:33:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634276183360655384