Theme: Science

  • Interesting. Now if you knew anything about mathematics, the limits of mathemati

    Interesting.
    Now if you knew anything about mathematics, the limits of mathematics, the limits of computatino that follow, and the necessity of supply-demand curves that follow that, and the use of ordinal logic to define supply demand curves because of the otherwise incommensurability of measures, then you’d never utter such a thing. But since as I’ve stated these are areas of my expertise I do. So, maybe read some gary stanley becker and learn behavioral econ, and hayek for informal capital, and popper for falsification, and chomsky for grammars, and a thousand other works of import.

    The fact that I use social media as a workshop does not make us peers. The fact that I respond to you does not make us peers. There arent many of them in the first place. And you couldn’t even get a seat in the nosebleed section, any more than the table.

    Just deal.
    Social may help you find some venue for self justification by pretentious dominancde expression that you cannot demonstrate by achievement in life. But I don’t have that problem either in industry or thought.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @goufmanouf @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 15:49:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635307042607906817

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635302439866990596

  • Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work i

    Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work in cognitive science, behavioral economics, epistemology, testimony, law, and most especially the logic of lying. So just as when you go to a doctor or lawyer and speak, and in turn they disambiguate what you’ve said into causes, I do the same. It’s just that I see how you’re lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, undermining, projecting, defending, evading, and denying. And work in this discipline unfortunately means a vast majority of the population is about as smart, cunning, witty, funny as a preschooler.

    Reply addressees: @goufmanouf @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 14:19:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635284366388768769

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635282117843386368

  • Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work i

    Well, you don’t know this, but you should be for engaging with me, that I work in cognitive science, behavioral economics, epistemology, testimony, law, and most especially the logic of lying. So just as when you go to a doctor or lawyer and speak, and in turn they disambiguate what you’ve said into causes, I do the same. It’s just that I see how you’re lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, undermining, projecting, defending, evading, and denying. And work in this discipline unfortunately means a vast majority of the population is about as smart, cunning, witty, funny as a preschooler.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 14:19:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635284366476861444

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635282117843386368

  • Dugin walks into the candy shop of science, philosophy, theology, and history an

    Dugin walks into the candy shop of science, philosophy, theology, and history and pulls out the flavor that most suits his taste at the momement. I’m not criticizing him. I’m just saying I understand why he has to.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 22:16:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635042016722821120

    Reply addressees: @RoseMinoan @lochu03 @UBERSOY1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635041463313764352

  • Try to falsify it. You won’t be able to. I promise. I know

    Try to falsify it. You won’t be able to. I promise. I know.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 22:08:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635040090211905536

    Reply addressees: @ScottJohn08 @ConceptualJames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635039068697559040

  • You’d think so but you can’t falsify it. I go through this all the time. Many th

    You’d think so but you can’t falsify it.
    I go through this all the time. Many things you’d think wouldn’t survive set testing(idealism), survive operational testing(realism).
    Turns out, just FYI, oddly enough, that everything in the universe can be (obviously) reduced to first principles, and, reductively there is just one, and from it one general principle by which all matter and behavior evovles.
    The universe isn’t smart. It just does what’s possible at every given combination of complexity.

    Reply addressees: @cpa_dallas @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 22:07:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635039864008613888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635038106826203137

  • You’d think so but you can’t falsify it. I go through this all the time. Many th

    You’d think so but you can’t falsify it.
    I go through this all the time. Many things you’d think wouldn’t survive set testing(idealism), survive operational testing(realism).
    Turns out, just FYI, oddly enough, that everything in the universe can be (obviously) reduced to first principles, and, reductively there is just one, and from it one general principle by which all matter and behavior evovles.
    The universe isn’t smart. It just does what’s possible at every given combination of complexity.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 22:07:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635039864088416262

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635038106826203137

  • “Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?” (bookmark)(core) Well, nature ha

    “Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?”
    (bookmark)(core)

    Well, nature has a hard problem beginning in the quantum background, and it solves it with velocity(spin) resulting in positive, negative, and equilibriuim. There is nothing in the unverse that violates this model – there can’t be. Everything in the universe is constructed from it.
    So we see this same rule throughout material, all life, and all of mankind, and most imporantly it the three possible means of human coercion: Physical, Social, and Reciprocal.
    Then we see it as large scale in organizing principles of state, religion, and contract(law). And we see it incomparative civilization as means of competition between races expressed in the various possible path dependences between state, religion, contract(law) institutions. And finally we see it in logic as undecidable, possibly true, and definitely false, and in all language that follows the same rules.

    There are only twenty something rules like this.
    And all of existence is explained by them.
    That is why, we make such an emphasis on trifuctionalism, as well as continuous recursive disambiguation, which is the means by which the universe defeats entropy (pressure spatial expansion) with negative entropy (concentration in mass), and the P-Method of disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, disambiguation, operationalization, of all terms into a system of ordinal measurement, within those rules.

    It might seem a lot at the beginning, but it’s the universe’s programming language. Not math. Why? Mathematical reducibility is smaller than computational reducibility. 😉

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 21:34:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635031469063020545

  • “Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?” (bookmark)(core) Well, nature ha

    “Q: CURT WHY THE EMPHASIS ON TRIFUNCTIONALISM?”
    (bookmark)(core)

    Well, nature has a hard problem beginning in the quantum background, and it solves it with velocity(spin) resulting in positive, negative, and equilibriuim. There is nothing in the unverse that violates this model – there can’t be. Everything in the universe is constructed from it.
    So we see this same rule throughout material, all life, and all of mankind, and most imporantly it the three possible means of human coercion: Physical, Social, and Reciprocal.
    Then we see it as large scale in organizing principles of state, religion, and contract(law). And we see it incomparative civilization as means of competition between races expressed in the various possible path dependences between state, religion, contract(law) institutions. And finally we see it in logic as undecidable, possibly true, and definitely false, and in all language that follows the same rules.

    There are only twenty something rules like this.
    And all of existence is explained by them.
    That is why, we make such an emphasis on trifuctionalism, as well as continuous recursive disambiguation, which is the means by which the universe defeats entropy (pressure spatial expansion) with negative entropy (concentration in mass), and the P-Method of disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, disambiguation, operationalization, of all terms into a system of ordinal measurement, within those rules.

    It might seem a lot at the beginning, but it’s the universe’s programming language. Not math. Why? Mathematical reducibility is smaller than computational reducibility. 😉

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 21:34:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635031469289529345

  • THE WESTERN GROUP STRATEGY: SPEED, MANEUVER, ADAPTATION, AND INITIATIVE : THE MA

    THE WESTERN GROUP STRATEGY: SPEED, MANEUVER, ADAPTATION, AND INITIATIVE : THE MAXIMZATION OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION.
    (bookmark)(core)
    -“
    With Bronze (Technology)
    Horse (Distance, Speed, Maneuver)
    Wheel (Logistics)
    Cattle (Capital)
    Alliance of Clans (Federation)
    Of Warriors, WiseMen, Craftsmen, Wives, Kin and Cattle
    By Voluntary Membership (prohibition on authority)
    Organized into a Universal Militia (Society as Army)
    Election of Leadership by Merit (license of decidability)
    Limited by Contract Terms (Rule of Law)
    And so:
    Self-Governed by the Natural Law of self-determination, by self-determined means,
    By the reciprocal grant of, the defense of, the inalienability of, and insurance of;
    Individual sovereignty in all demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in all display, word, and deed;
    To all members of the polity that are demonstrably able, willing, worthy, and sworn to exchange them;
    Producing adversarial markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war;
    And directing all dominance expression to the production of commons for all;
    By the Demand for Truth, Excellence, and Beauty.
    And as a consequence, the fastest discovery, innovation adaptation and evolution of knowledge, technology, economy, polity, war, and man that is possible for man;
    By the continuous evolution of human;
    Producing the greatest transcendence of man;
    In the shortest time, under the greatest prosperity, with the greatest certainty;
    And by the continuation of natural selection;
    By suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrating unfitness for those markets;
    An aristocracy, holding to the primacy of man;
    Profiting from the incremental domestication of the human-animal into peers.
    And as a consequence, institutionalizing and industrializing the production of human agency,
    Rapidly evolving man from animal, to slave, to serf, to freeman, to citizen, to sovereign –
    And into the gods they imagined.”–

    –“The West’s Group strategy is a universal militia maximizing speed, maneuver, adaptation, innovation, by the continuous domestication by farming human agency, through self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity, oath and truth before face, dependent on meritocracy, absent authority, leaving only adversarialism as a means of decidability, voting for production of commons, rule of law for dispute resolution, and markets for the production of goods services and information, and the necessity governing those with less agency, and culling those who lack agency, by natural and market selection, producing the civilization with the greatest conformity to and discovery of, adaptation to and application of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.”–

    This strategy is consistent across European Steppe Herders practicing entrepreneurial cattle raiding and warfare; European mixed herder agrarians practicing conquest of Europe – killing the men and keeping the women as they had captured cattle and women on the steppe; With the only example in written memory being the Spartans, who for all intents and purposes retained the strategy by which the European steppe herders conquered the European continent.
    As such, they commercialized with the other Greeks conquering locals and overextending; Romans conquering locals and overextending; Franks conquering Europe and overextending. Conquering the Levant and overextending. Conquering the new world and overextending; the British restoring the Roman Empire an overextending – all in the greatest commercial enterprise in history: the domestication of animal man for profit. And by overextension, collapsing, as did Rome, out of unwillingness to use middle eastern or far eastern brutality ‘on their inventory’.”-

    The western hubris is only in overextension.
    Because only western man is fit for western strategy.
    Because we left the rest behind.
    To transcend into the gods we imagine.
    Supremacy? No. Superiority yes.

    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 21:16:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635027048866430978