Theme: Responsibility

  • “I don’t blame the enemy for being what they are. I blame the man in the mirror.

    –“I don’t blame the enemy for being what they are. I blame the man in the mirror. “A lion does not trouble himself with the opinions of sheep” any more than we should trouble ourselves with the cultures and religions of civilizations that have failed so spectacularly by comparison that the very mention of them invokes either quaintness, compassion, pity, disdain, disgust, or even hatred througout all of history. So, integrate or leave. Ally or avoid. Our civilizational technology is in fact more psychologically and emotionally costly and stressful. But that is what is require for the benfits of our civilization. And oyur avoidance of those high costs is just a conspiracy to commit the crime of tax or draft evasion.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:52:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632197311940968449

  • “I agree that you’ve been harmed, I agree you have a claim, I agree to assist yo

    –“I agree that you’ve been harmed, I agree you have a claim, I agree to assist you in restitution, punishment, and prevention of repetition or immitation. But that’s the extent of it. We aren’t peers, we aren’t friends, and we aren’t family. Just because I’m acting in your interest doesn’t mean I’m your side, doesn’t mean I’m one of you. But loyalty to what’s right and just prevails. And that loyalty is enough.”–

    The point being that loyalty to what’s right is enough to unite in the prosecution of an enemy. Otherwise, we don’t have to agree on anything at all. We won’t. And probably can’t. And there is no need to. The only need to agree is if you desire to impose your will against others, just as the enemy seeks to impose their will against you.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:20:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632174203234287616

  • “I agree that you’ve been harmed, I agree you have a claim, I agree to assist yo

    –“I agree that you’ve been harmed, I agree you have a claim, I agree to assist you in restitution, punishment, and prevention of repetition or immitation. But that’s the extent of it. We aren’t peers, we aren’t friends, and we aren’t family. Just because I’m acting in your interest doesn’t mean I’m your side, doesn’t mean I’m one of you. But loyalty to what’s right and just prevails. And that loyalty is enough.”–

    The point being that loyalty to what’s right is enough to unite in the prosecution of an enemy. Otherwise, we don’t have to agree on anything at all. We won’t. And probably can’t. And there is no need to. The only need to agree is if you desire to impose your will against others, just as the enemy seeks to impose their will against you.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:20:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632174203137818625

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: WE DON’T HARM CHILDREN; WE DO HARM THOSE WHO DO We don’t kill

    RT @ThruTheHayes: WE DON’T HARM CHILDREN; WE DO HARM THOSE WHO DO

    We don’t kill them.
    We don’t’ sexually mutilate (circumcise; transition)…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 22:50:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631789158237716489

  • EVOLUTION DOES PUT A LIMIT ON MORAL CLAIMS Well, it puts a LIMIT on moral conseq

    EVOLUTION DOES PUT A LIMIT ON MORAL CLAIMS
    Well, it puts a LIMIT on moral consequences. So yes. The question is only how we practice morality within moral limits. And so the question is can you claim something is moral if it is harmful? Soft Eugenics was mainstream and rightly so before the second world war. It was, as far as I know, the moral strategy. Just like putting people in camps etc wasn’t SOFT eugenics, but HARD eugenics, and that does violate morality (meaning reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 14:42:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631666260898357250

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631663721809338368

  • DEFINING RACISM AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT –“Racism can only consist of presuming

    DEFINING RACISM AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT

    –“Racism can only consist of presuming the cost of a group stereotype’s attribute against an individual of that group AFTER that individual has paid the cost to demonstrate their personal positive deviation away from that specific group stereotype attribute to you.”– Luke Weinhagen @LukeWeinhagen

    You cannot judge an individual by the properties of a class, but you can judge a class by the properties of its individual members.

    In other words, it is illogical, when presented with individual information counter to the properties of a class, to treat the member of class with the properties of that class, instead of his or her demonstrated properties.

    It is not racism to discuss group differences and attempt to produce institutions and policy that assist in treating us as individuals and groups who require different training in order to reach the same mindfulness, competency, and success.

    It’s NOT racism to state that if a group of people hate you because of your race, that it’s only intelligent and practical to seek separation, to eliminate the conflict, and allow both groups to produce the formal and informal commons they prefer.

    It’s racism NOT to do either of those things. Including denying them such that people remain unhappy, in conflict, and deprived of human flourishing. (What you’re implying you prefer.)

    We must govern with the people we have, with the biology we have, the genetics we have, and the demographic distributions we have.

    Liars claim they are heroic when they just lack the courage to admit the truth, solve the problem, and assist mankind in achieving desired ends.

    The feminine, equalitarian, responsibility evading, ethic is just cowardice and fear and neuroticism to avoid the settling of conflicts between groups, by pretense that avoiding conflicts between individuals will scale. (it doesn’t.)

    Nothing on the left ‘scales’. That’s what it means to be a leftist. (successful empathizing but failed systematizing.)

    No more lies. Including lying by wishful thinking.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 18:35:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630637920846528533

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630632497162731520

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) (Continued ….) 9) Here i

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    (Continued ….)

    9) Here is what will ruin your day (‘because it ruined mine). Men achieve status through the accumulation of responsibility (capitalization). Women achieve status by evasion of responsibility (hyperconsumption). Just as there is no human behavior that cannot be reduced to the pursuit of acquisition, retention, or consumption, there is no sex difference in behavior that cannot be reduced to the search for irresponsibility and consumption IN time vs responsibility and capitalization OVER time. Likewise, women are devoted IN time, but men are loyal OVER time. In this sense, this is why relationships are returning to pre-agrarian serial monogamy with frequent ‘cheating’. So in abstract terms “women are eschewing political responsibility for personal hyperconsumption.” This is burning down civilizational capital in a genetic and cultural bonfire. But what are we to do? (Sweden,Denmark while we can afford it).
    10) Civilization depends on very complex accumulated ‘technologies’ of cooperation that provide us with Pareto hierarchies and nash distributions. We have just thrown a wrench in evolution. And while we’re taking the decline in population worldwide as a good thing given the energy cost per capita of industrial-age mankind, the fact is that our entire way of life is going to collapse if we do not find a way to adapt to this ‘wrench in the works’: the breakdown of intersexual markets, due to the breakdown of intersexual value.

    Great chat.
    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:47:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414397465063424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUy6CU_tLLQ

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) NOTES: 1) Adulthood: Most

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUy6CU_tLLQ

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:46:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229885927429

  • VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE) NOTES: 1) Adulthood: Most

    VIDEO: WESTERN WOMEN INFATILIZED (WOMEN”S ROUNDTABLE)
    https://t.co/vWZqVceKX7

    NOTES:
    1) Adulthood: Most civs, a woman is an adult when she has children (is responsible). Still true in some of the Catholic countries.
    2) Male Protectionism: We don’t have the capacity to suppress our protective instincts. We’re also far, far, more situationally aware and rapidly reacting in the protection of children. I’ve tried to find research on why women freeze before acting.
    3) Intersexual Relations: women have only one value to men, and that’s femininity. The masculinization of women on one hand and the export of jobs requiring male physical strength or mechanical intuition on the other have collapsed the mating market from both sides.
    4) Roles: The collapse of reproduction isn’t sustainable. What is happening to Japan, and shortly to China and Russia, is going to happen here. Our way of life is dependent upon ‘growth’ and intergenerational redistribution. That’s GOING to end. Soon. Artificial wombs? Might be a necessity. 😉
    5) “Childlike”: Males desire fertility. Youthful fertility has a higher success rate. Neoteny expresses fertility. The entire history of human evolution is driven by the preference for neoteny. And domestication emerged from neoteny. Don’t want masculine men that women universally go for if you don’t also accept that men want young fertility. I mean…. evolution has reasons so to speak. (Yes the Japanese perversion thing is really,r really, really creepy. I understand the biology of it but it’s still creepy.
    6) “Competency”: Yes competency has to do with genitalia because sex differences in INTEREST manifest in the sexual distribution of competency. There is also a fairly large difference in male and female capacity for verbal empathic vs physical spacial differences. This is even evident in how men and women do math. (pictures vs models).
    7) “Coddling” Men and women both coddle women. Why? Men aren’t sure why we do it. Same where women object to mansplaining, but men pretty much ignore woman-splaining twenty-four hours a day. (Many men would view this conversation as woman-splaining. And notice how this conversation is about how you feel, rather than the aggregate consequences of the transformation of reproductive production to work, production, taxation, and hyperconsumption in the absence of intergenerational reproduction. Again, Feels(individuals) vs Reals (systems)). We do this because of the sex differences in the division of the labor of TIME. Feminine empathizing IN time, and masculine systematizing OVER time. Once you understand this, it’s easy to say why men ignore women in anything not interpersonal, and women shame men for their frequent ‘stupidity’ in the interpersonal, or explaining how things work when the subject is how one feels about how they work. I mean. I find it pretty humorous in both directions. 😉
    8) “Boss ????”: This is female independence and the “strong independent woman” strategy. Men have nothing left to ‘trade’. And femininity is the only value women provide that men don’t provide better. If it feels good do it. But men will adapt accordingly too. Marriage and reproduction will continue to collapse. “Society” means children, because children are a commonality, where self-gratification is a particularism. So we don’t have a ‘society’ without children and families. Nothing we can do about it. CORE ISSUE: the destruction of the intersexual marketplace for reproduction, and the reduction of costs by the two-parent family (or even extended three-generational family is even better.).
    (continued in a reply …)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:46:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630414229365829632

  • Again, you see the world as positiva (command) and I do as negative (law). I don

    Again, you see the world as positiva (command) and I do as negative (law). I don’t want the job. I don’t want to be the victim of people doing that job. In general, they aren’t smart enough to do it. And it’s exasperating as it is…lol


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 02:36:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630396494858657792

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630396078578122754