Theme: Responsibility

  • RT @StevePender: @ConceptualJames There’s no such thing as individual rights, at

    RT @StevePender: @ConceptualJames There’s no such thing as individual rights, at least not in isolation. That’s a major misconception. Righ…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 06:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633361726786633733

  • “Explore and find myself”– Translated: grow up in your 20’s because you didn’t

    –“Explore and find myself”–

    Translated: grow up in your 20’s because you didn’t in your teens. Try to overcome the falsehoods you were indoctrinated into, and the debt you accumulated to pay for them, and in doing so burn your fertility, adaptability to the opposite sex, and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 21:30:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632856199031865346

  • THE SINS OF THE OVERCONFIDENT IGNORANT REINFORCES THEIR IGNORANCE –“Bring it. E

    THE SINS OF THE OVERCONFIDENT IGNORANT REINFORCES THEIR IGNORANCE
    –“Bring it. Explain why you believe castrating children physically or chemically with a high chance of sterilization is an acceptable choice? Why are you@openy fighting to do it? What other dysphoria is helped by affirming the delusion of the dysphoria? I’m waiting.”– @hippy_dog

    If you had the vaguest I what I was saying you’d realize that advocating for such things violates the criteria for restitutability, and consists of baiting into harm.

    Like I said. You might want to ASK questions rather than make assertions. Because I promise you, I understand this subject better than anyone living. Because I’m the first person spend his adult life researching and developing legal, constitutional, and policy reforms to counter it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 18:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632806838692446212

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632800271700049922


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hippy_dog @ApicePaul @ScottAdamsSays You really should leave this subject to people like me who know what they’re talking about.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1632800271700049922

  • THE SINS OF THE OVERCONFIDENT IGNORANT REINFORCES THEIR IGNORANCE –“Bring it. E

    THE SINS OF THE OVERCONFIDENT IGNORANT REINFORCES THEIR IGNORANCE
    –“Bring it. Explain why you believe castrating children physically or chemically with a high chance of sterilization is an acceptable choice? Why are you@openy fighting to do it? What other dysphoria is helped by affirming the delusion of the dysphoria? I’m waiting.”– @hippy_dog

    If you had the vaguest I what I was saying you’d realize that advocating for such things violates the criteria for restitutability, and consists of baiting into harm.

    Like I said. You might want to ASK questions rather than make assertions. Because I promise you, I understand this subject better than anyone living. Because I’m the first person spend his adult life researching and developing legal, constitutional, and policy reforms to counter it.

    Reply addressees: @hippy_dog @ApicePaul @ScottAdamsSays


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 18:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632806838541377536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632800271700049922


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hippy_dog @ApicePaul @ScottAdamsSays You really should leave this subject to people like me who know what they’re talking about.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1632800271700049922

  • You don’t want to know because it’s true and will cause you personal crisis like

    You don’t want to know because it’s true and will cause you personal crisis like it did the rest of us. 😉

    List any female(or feminine) bias and it’s easily reducible to evasion of responsibility for the commons.
    We have made female intuition virtuious because it was evolved for self and children. But like all other sex differences in cognition female(feminine) cognition (empathizing in time, verbal, pictoral) doesn’t scale.
    This is the cause of our present conflict.
    We added women to the franchise without limiting female anti-social, anti-economic, and anti-political behavior as thoroughly as we had male. (which in retrospect is an obvvious failure). However criticisms of women’s thinking during the era of women’s sufferage has played out rather quickly with the predicted destructive results.
    The question is, how do we fix this so that we preserve the universal franchise? It’s rather challenging.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:51:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632801200939704321

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632797358005055492

  • You don’t want to know because it’s true and will cause you personal crisis like

    You don’t want to know because it’s true and will cause you personal crisis like it did the rest of us. 😉

    List any female(or feminine) bias and it’s easily reducible to evasion of responsibility for the commons.
    We have made female intuition virtuious because it was evolved for self and children. But like all other sex differences in cognition female(feminine) cognition (empathizing in time, verbal, pictoral) doesn’t scale.
    This is the cause of our present conflict.
    We added women to the franchise without limiting female anti-social, anti-economic, and anti-political behavior as thoroughly as we had male. (which in retrospect is an obvvious failure). However criticisms of women’s thinking during the era of women’s sufferage has played out rather quickly with the predicted destructive results.
    The question is, how do we fix this so that we preserve the universal franchise? It’s rather challenging.

    Reply addressees: @Merry_in_NC @ScottAdamsSays


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:51:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632801200847331328

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632797358005055492

  • LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE: (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, sta

    LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE:
    (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, states that your intention doesn’t matter. In a crime (a severe tort or trespass) your intention may matter or not.
    but;
    (b) The question is what shall we prohibit trespass against? What is the scope of our demonstrated interests?
    and;
    (c) Westerners alone, developed military reporting, testimonial (empirical) truth, and truth-before-face, in confession, commons, and court. Truth before face regardless of cost to self image, reputation, the competence or dominance hierarchy, is a DUTY. That duty is the reason the west developed jury, democracy (jury), thang and sentate debate (jury), and the reason, empiricism, and science, that almost alone dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, and poverty.
    And;
    (d) Truth before face is horoic, a contribution to the commons (a tax, sacrifice), and a status symbol for men, who demonstrate they are willing to risk conflict for the common good. But it is an risk for women and effeminate men, because they seek to avoid conflict at a cost to the common good. Ergo men ‘adult’ the sexes, ad women “infantilize” the sexes, in any and all matters of the commons. The cognitive difference between men and women is male systematizing over time seeking responsibiity and capital even by risk for status, vs female empathizing in time seeking evasion of responsibilty and capital accumulation in favor of huperconsumption at low risk. Hence female irresponsibility for the commons, hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
    But;
    (e) The introduction of women into the voting pool without either training women to avoid their evasion of responsibility for the commons, or placing a requrement for demonstrated competency in matters of the commons, opened teh door for postwar ‘feminization and infantilization’ of the institutional, political, economic, educational, social, familial, informational, and familial commons. Thereby destroying truth before face, realism, naturalism, empiricism, testimony, law, social norms and traditions, and the family as the first system of intergenerational production. And it’s unconsious, involuntary, instinct. And it resulted in the same as it has in every other past condition including the feminization of the french court, the christian destruction of the classical world, and the fall of spartans and their civilization.
    Therefore;
    (f) We must fight in war, we must forgoe crime, we must pay taxes, we must adhere to the natural law (law proper), and we must speak the truth before face regardless of cost, or we cannot have rule of law, jury, democracy, the high trust society, the economic, innovative, adaptive, evolutionary gains of the west that evolved faster than the rest whenever possible in the bronze (indo european), iron (mediterranean) and steel (atlantic) ages. And with that evolution we ended 2000 years of stagnation, poverty, disease and suffering, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming of ignorance, superstition poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
    Therefore;
    (g) the biological differences between classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races is as significant as the difference betwen the sexes. And for the same reasons: i) the degree of neotenic evolution of the race ii) the degree of genetic load in the classes iii) the asymmetry of classes between races and ethnicities iv) and the necessity of and the tendency for sexes, classes, ethnicities, civiliizations, and races to rely on kin preference and kin selection simply because they have more INTERESTS IN COMMON than those otherwise. As such given that the most scarce resource is cooperation, and that indifference between individuals and groups is a NECESSARY behavioral economy that cannot be evaded.
    (h) So this creates a conflict between the needs of our cooperation in particular commons, and the needs of our cooperation by general trade.
    ie: Separation is the only possible solution.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 16:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632785273774915585

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632747665321791488

  • LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE: (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, sta

    LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE:
    (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, states that your intention doesn’t matter. In a crime (a severe tort or trespass) your intention may matter or not.
    but;
    (b) The question is what shall we prohibit trespass against? What is the scope of our demonstrated interests?
    and;
    (c) Westerners alone, developed military reporting, testimonial (empirical) truth, and truth-before-face, in confession, commons, and court. Truth before face regardless of cost to self image, reputation, the competence or dominance hierarchy, is a DUTY. That duty is the reason the west developed jury, democracy (jury), thang and sentate debate (jury), and the reason, empiricism, and science, that almost alone dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, and poverty.
    And;
    (d) Truth before face is horoic, a contribution to the commons (a tax, sacrifice), and a status symbol for men, who demonstrate they are willing to risk conflict for the common good. But it is an risk for women and effeminate men, because they seek to avoid conflict at a cost to the common good. Ergo men ‘adult’ the sexes, ad women “infantilize” the sexes, in any and all matters of the commons. The cognitive difference between men and women is male systematizing over time seeking responsibiity and capital even by risk for status, vs female empathizing in time seeking evasion of responsibilty and capital accumulation in favor of huperconsumption at low risk. Hence female irresponsibility for the commons, hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
    But;
    (e) The introduction of women into the voting pool without either training women to avoid their evasion of responsibility for the commons, or placing a requrement for demonstrated competency in matters of the commons, opened teh door for postwar ‘feminization and infantilization’ of the institutional, political, economic, educational, social, familial, informational, and familial commons. Thereby destroying truth before face, realism, naturalism, empiricism, testimony, law, social norms and traditions, and the family as the first system of intergenerational production. And it’s unconsious, involuntary, instinct. And it resulted in the same as it has in every other past condition including the feminization of the french court, the christian destruction of the classical world, and the fall of spartans and their civilization.
    Therefore;
    (f) We must fight in war, we must forgoe crime, we must pay taxes, we must adhere to the natural law (law proper), and we must speak the truth before face regardless of cost, or we cannot have rule of law, jury, democracy, the high trust society, the economic, innovative, adaptive, evolutionary gains of the west that evolved faster than the rest whenever possible in the bronze (indo european), iron (mediterranean) and steel (atlantic) ages. And with that evolution we ended 2000 years of stagnation, poverty, disease and suffering, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming of ignorance, superstition poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
    Therefore;
    (g) the biological differences between classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races is as significant as the difference betwen the sexes. And for the same reasons: i) the degree of neotenic evolution of the race ii) the degree of genetic load in the classes iii) the asymmetry of classes between races and ethnicities iv) and the necessity of and the tendency for sexes, classes, ethnicities, civiliizations, and races to rely on kin preference and kin selection simply because they have more INTERESTS IN COMMON than those otherwise. As such given that the most scarce resource is cooperation, and that indifference between individuals and groups is a NECESSARY behavioral economy that cannot be evaded.
    (h) So this creates a conflict between the needs of our cooperation in particular commons, and the needs of our cooperation by general trade.
    ie: Separation is the only possible solution.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 16:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632785273389035526

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632747665321791488

  • Um. I don’t do dominance. I do natural law. the law of man, nature, and if there

    Um. I don’t do dominance. I do natural law. the law of man, nature, and if there is one, nature’s god. that law that made modern prosperity possible.

    I *DO* to retaliation, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention of those who violate that law.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 23:56:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632530640842178563

    Reply addressees: @PNACstreetgang @FenianWiseguy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632502269425115136

  • “I don’t blame the enemy for being what they are. I blame the man in the mirror.

    –“I don’t blame the enemy for being what they are. I blame the man in the mirror. “A lion does not trouble himself with the opinions of sheep” any more than we should trouble ourselves with the cultures and religions of civilizations that have failed so spectacularly by comparison that the very mention of them invokes either quaintness, compassion, pity, disdain, disgust, or even hatred througout all of history. So, integrate or leave. Ally or avoid. Our civilizational technology is in fact more psychologically and emotionally costly and stressful. But that is what is require for the benfits of our civilization. And oyur avoidance of those high costs is just a conspiracy to commit the crime of tax or draft evasion.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:52:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632197311940968449