Theme: Responsibility

  • You do: – approval or rejection (feminine) – desirable or undesirable (feminine)

    You do:

    – approval or rejection (feminine)

    – desirable or undesirable (feminine)

    – proportional or disproportional. (feminine lef)

    – moral or immoral (christian right)

    – right or wrong. (masculine right)

    – true or false (everyone)

    And we do;

    – reciprocal (productive) vs irreciprocal ( parasitic)

    – testifiable vs untestifiable

    – truthful and untruthful


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:58:00 UTC

  • Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST –

    Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST

    —“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.

    <q>”…women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.”</q>

    This point, and the general spirit of the original post fell short in terms of fairly apportioning responsibility and, therefore, will have fallen short in terms of re-building legitimate male strength, which must be founded on a more serious appraisal of past mistakes and a full acknowledgement of the burden of blame.

    The:

    <q>”women have destroyed Western civilisation'</q>

    … argument has become almost a rallying call to less discerning, disenfranchised males and it’s in dire need of correction, or balance certainly, by more superintendent males.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Correct.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:55:00 UTC

  • THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE PREFER JUST MASTERS OVER PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY by Peter

    THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE PREFER JUST MASTERS OVER PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

    by Peter Vey

    What’s that old saying? Where people choose comfort over freedom because they desire Just Masters over having to be responsible for their own decisions.

    Their conclusion is always narrow in scope and they aren’t capable of understanding what is true and just.

    The same morons will say that all leaders throughout time were evil or oppressive, when a little effort churns up the contrary—many leaders genuinely loved their people, and it showed.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:55:00 UTC

  • THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE PREFER JUST MASTERS OVER PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY by Peter

    THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE PREFER JUST MASTERS OVER PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

    by Peter Vey

    What’s that old saying? Where people choose comfort over freedom because they desire Just Masters over having to be responsible for their own decisions.

    Their conclusion is always narrow in scope and they aren’t capable of understanding what is true and just.

    The same morons will say that all leaders throughout time were evil or oppressive, when a little effort churns up the contrary—many leaders genuinely loved their people, and it showed.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:27:00 UTC

  • Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST –

    Lisa Outhwaite CORRECTLY APPORTIONS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WEST

    —“Curt Doolittle, You personally do not. There is nothing MGTOW about you.

    <q>”…women are how the marxist, postmodernists, and feminists, brought their repetition of the destruction of civilization into ours.”</q>

    This point, and the general spirit of the original post fell short in terms of fairly apportioning responsibility and, therefore, will have fallen short in terms of re-building legitimate male strength, which must be founded on a more serious appraisal of past mistakes and a full acknowledgement of the burden of blame.

    The:

    <q>”women have destroyed Western civilisation'</q>

    … argument has become almost a rallying call to less discerning, disenfranchised males and it’s in dire need of correction, or balance certainly, by more superintendent males.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Correct.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 11:23:00 UTC

  • It’s only hard to imagine for people who haven’t been to court over contract cla

    It’s only hard to imagine for people who haven’t been to court over contract claims in biz. You either have the knowledge to make a claim you do – or you don’t. You are either offering an exchange of consideration (reciprocity) or you are not. Courts need a checklist. I gave one.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 01:19:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189351151663226880

    Reply addressees: @natrolleon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189324864236204032


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189324864236204032

  • Simple Version: You are as responsible for due diligence in what you say in publ

    Simple Version: You are as responsible for due diligence in what you say in public, to the public in matters public, as in testimony before the court, against error, bias, wishful thinking, fraud, and deceit. Leftism is done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 21:21:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189291216585871360

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189290949341601792


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 It’s the first section under Rights and Obligations, but it’s in draft format and I’m not sure you’ll understand it. I prefer to write a paragraph for each clause for new people.Go ahead, and ask question, but don’t assume for a minute you understand, or I haven’t thought of it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189290949341601792


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 It’s the first section under Rights and Obligations, but it’s in draft format and I’m not sure you’ll understand it. I prefer to write a paragraph for each clause for new people.Go ahead, and ask question, but don’t assume for a minute you understand, or I haven’t thought of it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189290949341601792

  • WHITE, GREY, BLACK, LIES IN P-LAW by Stephen Thomas No one really cares if you l

    WHITE, GREY, BLACK, LIES IN P-LAW

    by Stephen Thomas

    No one really cares if you lie for vanity’s sake. That’s a white lie.

    Libel, Slander

    False Advertising

    Baiting into Hazard

    Fraud private or Political

    Subversion of the Commons

    Conspiracy to subvert the Commons

    All of which are well defined. Those are black lies.

    You must lie in public to the public about matters public or conspire to propagate lies to the public about matters public

    And worse, you musn’t lie FROM a position OF influence TO the public ABOUT the public, about products, policy, economics, science or law.

    If you want to tell everyone you wear the wrong size shoe. No one is gonna to arrest you. We will however laugh at you for being so damn petty!

    (—“I would tell you your baby’s is cute, your children are beautiful, your wife is lovely, and you are charming, brave, and witty. None of those is true. But they demonstrate I will invest in building trust in our relationship.”—CurtD )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 19:54:00 UTC

  • HOW WILL P-LAW ON TRUTHFUL AND RECIPROCAL PUBLIC SPEECH AFFECT ME, AND OUR LIVES

    HOW WILL P-LAW ON TRUTHFUL AND RECIPROCAL PUBLIC SPEECH AFFECT ME, AND OUR LIVES?

    We’re decreasing tolerance for, and extending the liability for, the truthfulness and reciprocity we already enforce in contracts, selling, marketing and advertising, to all speech in public to the public, on matters of the public, making it impossible for anyone, including you, marketers, professors, intellectuals, media, and politicians, say anything they can’t testify to in court, because it is testifiable, and reciprocal. Meaning you must limit your public speech in public, to the public in matters public, especially for persona, economic or political gains, to what you can demonstrate you know enough to testify to, and that you can demonstrate you are not advocating, encouraging, or causing, the imposition of costs upon others without their fully informed, voluntary exchange. The only objection you can have is if you want engage in false and or irreciprocal speech. This means we will restore libel, slander, harmful gossip (undermining), psychologizing and moralizing (undermining instead of explaining the rational incentives of the people involved), suggestion(implying but not stating), obscurantism (hiding the truth), all left attempts at using the government to take rather than exchange between us, and all left attempts at lying about humans, our psychological, social, economic, and political orders. In other words, it will restore our informational commons to only that which one warrants is not false and not hurtful or harmful, or you will pay the price as if you did so in court. This means you can say whatever you want as long as it’s a constructive, a compromise exchange, helpful, and true. It means you cant say anything that’s destructive, encouraging conspiracy, harmful, and false. Yes the government, the media, advertising, marketing, public intellectuals, professors and teachers can no longer say comforting false things, and that your protection as a consumer made every single person in a company responsible for telling the truth and doing the reciprocal, ethical, moral thing, or they are open to prosecution. Yes it means that there will be a flurry of court cases as we build up a body of law for the many new conditions the law must cover, but this is what we do all the time, and we are very, very good at it. And it is very hard to be found guilty if you have in fact been careful with your words. And of course, no one cares about petty individual slip ups. We all make them. It is however different when it’s in the media, or from a public intellectual or politician attempting to inform the public or frame public discourse.. I suspect a rapid decline in news and a rapid shift in what remains, and that twitter and Facebook will have very serious problems if they are publishers, and as such will shift to platforms. And very quickly we will go back to a much less politicized, much more peaceful, much more prosocial civilization.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 19:03:00 UTC

  • Simple Version: You are as responsible for due diligence in what you say in publ

    Simple Version: You are as responsible for due diligence in what you say in public, to the public in matters public, as in testimony before the court.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 17:59:00 UTC