Theme: Responsibility

  • ONE CHILD POLICY Prohibiting redistribution to you, without exchange for your st

    ONE CHILD POLICY

    Prohibiting redistribution to you, without exchange for your sterilization has nothing to do with the state – just restitution for your act of aggression.

    So It’s entirely to do with (a) violation of the natural law of reciprocity we call tort, as measured by that system of measurement we call property. (b) the imposition of costs on the rest of us in the polity for pollution of the genetic, normative, institutional informational, and aesthetic commons (c) and your failure of due diligence forcing us into hazard for your breeding without the ability to pay for raising your offspring, therefore forcing us to do so instead – theft.

    It’s just non-aggression. Don’t aggress. Don’t steal. Don’t impose costs on us. It’s a matter of property and law and has nothing to do with the state.

    Instead, we prohibit the state from conspiring with you in the conduct of your crimes against us.

    Now, conversely most people can’t have kids because the state is taxing the middle class out of high investment parenting in order to redistribute reproduction to low investment parenting in the genetically unrecoverable underclasses.

    Stop trying to conspire to steal.

    You too.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 11:47:00 UTC

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

  • News: “STRONG EMPOWERED WOMAN CLAIMS ZERO RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER TERRIBLE ACTION

    News: “STRONG EMPOWERED WOMAN CLAIMS ZERO RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER TERRIBLE ACTIONS!!! “Wake me up when the script changes.”— @StefanMolyneux


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:54:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190250788263776256

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @BlackPillTrader every man a sheriff, whether he wants to be

    RT @curtdoolittle: @BlackPillTrader every man a sheriff, whether he wants to be or not.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:53:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190250539222732800

  • News: “STRONG EMPOWERED WOMAN CLAIMS ZERO RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER TERRIBLE ACTION

    News: “STRONG EMPOWERED WOMAN CLAIMS ZERO RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER TERRIBLE ACTIONS!!! “Wake me up when the script changes.”— @StefanMolyneux


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:54:00 UTC

  • What is more abominable? Hiding behind lies in order to free ride upon the emoti

    What is more abominable? Hiding behind lies in order to free ride upon the emotional and intellectual works of others, or pointing a finger of accusation at liars who claim virtue in parasitic free riding on the emotional and intellectual works of others?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 01:15:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190074892512833538

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190073518907629569


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190073518907629569

  • every man a sheriff, whether he wants to be or not

    every man a sheriff, whether he wants to be or not.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 00:34:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190064413191163905

    Reply addressees: @BlackPillTrader

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190063062436454406


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190063062436454406

  • (Conversely, It doesn’t say some evil god will punish us otherwise, so we must o

    (Conversely, It doesn’t say some evil god will punish us otherwise, so we must obey like domesticated animals, slaves, and illiterate, ignorant unintelligent poor.)

    It says we are fully capable of reading the evidence of reality whether or not some liar in the past mad stuff up.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:31:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189988182194114563

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189987895865679872


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays No, we say, these are the physical laws of the natural world, these are the natural laws of human cooperation, and within these rules men ascend into the gods we imagine (aryanism) by rapid, continuous, adaptation, to invention and change.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189987895865679872


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays No, we say, these are the physical laws of the natural world, these are the natural laws of human cooperation, and within these rules men ascend into the gods we imagine (aryanism) by rapid, continuous, adaptation, to invention and change.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189987895865679872

  • QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW — THE GOOD PLEASURE CHOICE VALUE PREFE

    QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW

    — THE GOOD
    PLEASURE
    CHOICE
    VALUE
    PREFERENCE
    GOOD
    VIOLENCE
    LOYALTY
    EMPATHY
    PAN DERING
    TOLERANCE
    TOLERATING A KNOWN THEFT
    CHARITY
    FAIRNESS
    EQUALITY… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496269370969958&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 23:59:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189693258827472898