Theme: Responsibility

  • Full Definition: Baiting Into Hazard

    —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

    [I]t’s short for the Abrahamic (Jewish, Muslim, Semitic, Cognitively-Female) technique of undermining host civilizations (groups): “Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Failure of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s), And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.” That paragraph may require multiple reads, so that you follow the full sequence. It is the genetic conflict strategy of females who must manage children by half truths, compete and cooperate with other women by half truths, and influence or undermine the dominance hierarchy of men with half truths, using the suite of disapproval, ridicule, shaming, scolding, psychologizing, moralizing, gossiping, rallying, and if necessary psychotic episodes (female version of anti-social behavior) to obtain her interests – because she cannot otherwise compete by production, trade, knowledge, argument, or violence. Males fight to the point of compliance with position in the hierarchy (duty and loyalty), while females undermine to the point of ostracization or death (submission, destruction). This strategy is universal among primates as well as most mammals capable of social organization. THE SEMITIC SPECIALIZATION IN FEMALE MEANS OF UNDERMINING AND DECEIT Semitic Civilization and its institutionalization of the female means of conflict, is the antithesis of European, Indian and Eastern civilization: it is the source of the last Semitic Dark Age of superstition, ignorance, and denial by Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to consume and destroy. And it’s the same technique used to bring about the second Semitic Dark Age – this time of Pseudoscience (including economic innumeracy) and Sophism in the forms of Jewish Marxism to instigate conflcit between the classes, Jewish Postmodernism cause conflict by undermining conformity to high trust norms, Jewish Denialism that we call Political Correctness to deny truth, all under the false promise that equality – ever desirous of the female given her demand for consumption – is possible. When the entire point of jewish cosmopolitan universalism in this age, like jewish supernatural universalism in the last, is merely to undermine the aristocratic civilizations that by use of truth, contract, markets, heroism, excellence, and eugenics, dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of a nature all but deliberately hostile to man. EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood uner physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining. Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women’s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.  Europeans are male superpredators, and jews are female superpredators, with the only difference being that europeans dominated the production of beneficial rewards for mankind, and jews and arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind. Now let’s try to work through a few more definitions. HAZARD A hazard refers to a circumstance that has the potential to cause harm to a vulnerable target, that lacking knowledge, and-or, having incentives, that might bait him into harm. i.e. Something as simple as an area prone to flooding, or landslides. In Washington State there are old coal mines in the mountains that periodically collapse internally, creating voids in the surface, you can fall into and die – swallowed by the earth. NATURAL HAZARD Any condition where an asymmetry of knowledge (ignorance) can lead another person to harm. i.e. earthquake, landslide, hurricane and tsunami; a barrel of toxic chemicals; powered construction equipment. A ditch or foundation that may cave in on workers. CREATING A HAZARD A failure of due diligence in defending others against a hazard you are either aware of or have created. i.e. a failure to cover a well-hole that a child can fall into. Old but common one: refrigerators with locking doors left at junkyards with the door on, so that children can get inside, suffocate, or starve, and die. MORAL HAZARD When a party with more information about its actions or intentions has a tendency or incentive to behave against the interests of the other party with less information.  Usury, Prostitution, and Drugs are the most common moral hazards. The most common topic on law involves insurance schemes, where one is incentivized to commit arson or murder simply because one has insurance on the building or person. That should cover Hazard. Now let’s deal with False Promise: FALSE PROMISE The most common type are psychological false promises: Life after death as Freedom from Death, followed by freedom from knowledge of one’s value to others: Marxism as Freedom from Competition for Production in the Market between Classes, Feminism as freedom from the compromise between the genders, Postmodernism as freedom from  sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, freedom from paying the costs of conformity to high trust norms, traditions, institutions, and laws, and even freedom from Truth, Reason, and Science. PILPUL Using sophism and overloading to make excuses that convince you (sell you), baiting you into the hazard. Where sophism is a fallacious argument used deliberately to deceive. Among the sophisms are the ‘big lies” that involve the three techniques of constructing big lies that we call Fictionalisms: Magic to Pseudoscience, Surrealism to Idealism, Supernatural to Theological. CRITIQUE Using undermining and sophism and decets – particularly straw man false arguments – to undermine your due diligence or falsify the experience and evidence. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION Using numbers of people, propaganda, information, symbols to overload your reason and cause you to fall prey to false promise, pilpul and critique so that our primary means of defense from falsehood – competition in a market for information with others who might disagree – is impossible. EXAMPLES If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap – because you TRUST but your ability to FALSIFY has been undermined through a technique we call “suggestion and overloading”.  Suggestion and Overloading force you to appeal to intuition and emotion despite  your reason. So just as you can be overwhelmed by too much information or too much stimulation or too much excitement or fear, you can be overloaded for the purpose of deceiving you intentionally. WESTERNERS ARE MOST VULNERABLE TO JEWISH, MUSLIM, FEMALE BAITING In the case of western civilization, our high trust society is most vulnerable to the Jewish, and Muslim Semitic and Cognitive Female means of undermining precisely because our civilization’s history, traditions, institutions, and laws consist of markets that guarantee sovereignty and choice, under the presumption that those who make poor decisions will learn from them. Unfortunately, false promises that it is possible to defeat physical (material) and natural (behavioral) laws of nature, that can be cast as oppression by the (Parental, Paternal) aristocracy, and therefore escaped – when they cannot be except by equality in devolution into dysgenia, ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, and poverty. Only European males developed Heroism and Excellence, Promise and Contract, Truth and Oath, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Natural law and Jury, and the resulting Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, polities, and War. We are the only people sufficiently masculine on earth to speak truth before face regardless of cost, and to force this martial testimony down into every layer of the population other than the underclasses. And until the Jewish Postwar Invasion even our women largely spoke truthfully. How do we reverse this second Jewish Dark age?  By extending the prohibition on hazardous speech from commercial to  financial, economic, political, strategic, and scientific speech, thereby holding every issue of speech in public to the public on matters public involuntarily warrantied, and involuntarily liable, and where we prosecute with vigor those who make false promises that bait into hazard. “Sovereign” means that every man is his own country own legislature and own army, limited only by natural law – do not impose costs upon others that would cause them to retaliate against you for your actions – intentional or not.

  • Full Definition: Baiting Into Hazard

    —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

    [I]t’s short for the Abrahamic (Jewish, Muslim, Semitic, Cognitively-Female) technique of undermining host civilizations (groups): “Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Failure of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s), And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.” That paragraph may require multiple reads, so that you follow the full sequence. It is the genetic conflict strategy of females who must manage children by half truths, compete and cooperate with other women by half truths, and influence or undermine the dominance hierarchy of men with half truths, using the suite of disapproval, ridicule, shaming, scolding, psychologizing, moralizing, gossiping, rallying, and if necessary psychotic episodes (female version of anti-social behavior) to obtain her interests – because she cannot otherwise compete by production, trade, knowledge, argument, or violence. Males fight to the point of compliance with position in the hierarchy (duty and loyalty), while females undermine to the point of ostracization or death (submission, destruction). This strategy is universal among primates as well as most mammals capable of social organization. THE SEMITIC SPECIALIZATION IN FEMALE MEANS OF UNDERMINING AND DECEIT Semitic Civilization and its institutionalization of the female means of conflict, is the antithesis of European, Indian and Eastern civilization: it is the source of the last Semitic Dark Age of superstition, ignorance, and denial by Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to consume and destroy. And it’s the same technique used to bring about the second Semitic Dark Age – this time of Pseudoscience (including economic innumeracy) and Sophism in the forms of Jewish Marxism to instigate conflcit between the classes, Jewish Postmodernism cause conflict by undermining conformity to high trust norms, Jewish Denialism that we call Political Correctness to deny truth, all under the false promise that equality – ever desirous of the female given her demand for consumption – is possible. When the entire point of jewish cosmopolitan universalism in this age, like jewish supernatural universalism in the last, is merely to undermine the aristocratic civilizations that by use of truth, contract, markets, heroism, excellence, and eugenics, dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of a nature all but deliberately hostile to man. EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood uner physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining. Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women’s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.  Europeans are male superpredators, and jews are female superpredators, with the only difference being that europeans dominated the production of beneficial rewards for mankind, and jews and arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind. Now let’s try to work through a few more definitions. HAZARD A hazard refers to a circumstance that has the potential to cause harm to a vulnerable target, that lacking knowledge, and-or, having incentives, that might bait him into harm. i.e. Something as simple as an area prone to flooding, or landslides. In Washington State there are old coal mines in the mountains that periodically collapse internally, creating voids in the surface, you can fall into and die – swallowed by the earth. NATURAL HAZARD Any condition where an asymmetry of knowledge (ignorance) can lead another person to harm. i.e. earthquake, landslide, hurricane and tsunami; a barrel of toxic chemicals; powered construction equipment. A ditch or foundation that may cave in on workers. CREATING A HAZARD A failure of due diligence in defending others against a hazard you are either aware of or have created. i.e. a failure to cover a well-hole that a child can fall into. Old but common one: refrigerators with locking doors left at junkyards with the door on, so that children can get inside, suffocate, or starve, and die. MORAL HAZARD When a party with more information about its actions or intentions has a tendency or incentive to behave against the interests of the other party with less information.  Usury, Prostitution, and Drugs are the most common moral hazards. The most common topic on law involves insurance schemes, where one is incentivized to commit arson or murder simply because one has insurance on the building or person. That should cover Hazard. Now let’s deal with False Promise: FALSE PROMISE The most common type are psychological false promises: Life after death as Freedom from Death, followed by freedom from knowledge of one’s value to others: Marxism as Freedom from Competition for Production in the Market between Classes, Feminism as freedom from the compromise between the genders, Postmodernism as freedom from  sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, freedom from paying the costs of conformity to high trust norms, traditions, institutions, and laws, and even freedom from Truth, Reason, and Science. PILPUL Using sophism and overloading to make excuses that convince you (sell you), baiting you into the hazard. Where sophism is a fallacious argument used deliberately to deceive. Among the sophisms are the ‘big lies” that involve the three techniques of constructing big lies that we call Fictionalisms: Magic to Pseudoscience, Surrealism to Idealism, Supernatural to Theological. CRITIQUE Using undermining and sophism and decets – particularly straw man false arguments – to undermine your due diligence or falsify the experience and evidence. SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION Using numbers of people, propaganda, information, symbols to overload your reason and cause you to fall prey to false promise, pilpul and critique so that our primary means of defense from falsehood – competition in a market for information with others who might disagree – is impossible. EXAMPLES If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap – because you TRUST but your ability to FALSIFY has been undermined through a technique we call “suggestion and overloading”.  Suggestion and Overloading force you to appeal to intuition and emotion despite  your reason. So just as you can be overwhelmed by too much information or too much stimulation or too much excitement or fear, you can be overloaded for the purpose of deceiving you intentionally. WESTERNERS ARE MOST VULNERABLE TO JEWISH, MUSLIM, FEMALE BAITING In the case of western civilization, our high trust society is most vulnerable to the Jewish, and Muslim Semitic and Cognitive Female means of undermining precisely because our civilization’s history, traditions, institutions, and laws consist of markets that guarantee sovereignty and choice, under the presumption that those who make poor decisions will learn from them. Unfortunately, false promises that it is possible to defeat physical (material) and natural (behavioral) laws of nature, that can be cast as oppression by the (Parental, Paternal) aristocracy, and therefore escaped – when they cannot be except by equality in devolution into dysgenia, ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, and poverty. Only European males developed Heroism and Excellence, Promise and Contract, Truth and Oath, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Natural law and Jury, and the resulting Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, polities, and War. We are the only people sufficiently masculine on earth to speak truth before face regardless of cost, and to force this martial testimony down into every layer of the population other than the underclasses. And until the Jewish Postwar Invasion even our women largely spoke truthfully. How do we reverse this second Jewish Dark age?  By extending the prohibition on hazardous speech from commercial to  financial, economic, political, strategic, and scientific speech, thereby holding every issue of speech in public to the public on matters public involuntarily warrantied, and involuntarily liable, and where we prosecute with vigor those who make false promises that bait into hazard. “Sovereign” means that every man is his own country own legislature and own army, limited only by natural law – do not impose costs upon others that would cause them to retaliate against you for your actions – intentional or not.

  • DEFINITION: SCOLDING, SCOLD, SCOLDS, SHREWS (disturbing the peace and harmony of

    DEFINITION: SCOLDING, SCOLD, SCOLDS, SHREWS

    (disturbing the peace and harmony of the commons)

    A medieval offense; women who were verbally disputative; who incited or agitated against the public peace.

    Related Terms: Ducking Stool, Common Scold, Scold. The convicted were called common scolds, or just scolds or even shrews.

    “A troublesome and angry woman who, by brawling and wrangling amongst her neighbours, breaks the public peace, increases discord and becomes a public nuisance….”

    Andrews, in his book Old Time Punishments explains why the medieval English even cared about scolding and scolds:

    “It is clear, from a careful study of the history of medieval times, that virtue and amiability amongst the middle and lower classes, generally speaking, did not prevail. The free use of the tongue gave rise to riots and feuds to such an extent that it is difficult for us to realize at the present day. A strong feeling against scolding woman came down to a late.”

    He also quotes from a 1467 Leicester city ordinance which provided that:

    “… scolds to be punished by on a cuck-stool before their own doors and then carried to the four gates of the town.”

    Usual punishment for scolding was either cucking stool or a ducking stool or even the imposition of a brank for a period of time. For men who incited unrest or were disputative, the typical punishment was a period of time in the stocks or the brank.

    Scolding and bad speech were coded as feminine offences by the late medieval period. Women of all marital statuses were prosecuted for scolding, though married women featured most frequently, while widows were rarely labelled scolds.

    Women who were also charged with other offences, such as violence, nightwandering, eavesdropping or sexual impropriety were also likely to be labelled scolds.

    Individuals were frequently labelled ‘common scolds’, indicating the impact of their behaviour and speech on the whole community.

    Men accused of scolding were often charged alongside their wives. Helen, wife of Peter Bradwall scolded Hugh Welesson and Isabel, his wife, in Middlewich in 1434, calling Isabel a “child murderer” and Hugh a “skallet [wretched] knave”. Isabel and Hugh also scolded Helen, calling her a “lesyng blebberer” (lying bletherer).

    All parties were fined for the offences, though Hugh and Isabel were fined jointly. Like women, male scolds were often accused of many other offences, such as fornication, theft, illegal trading, and assault.

    Karen Jones identified 13 men prosecuted for scolding in Kent’s secular courts, compared to 94 women and 2 couples.

    LATER PUNISHMENTS OF SCOLDING

    Later legal treatises reflected the dominance of scolding as a female offence. In the Commentaries on the Laws of England, Blackstone says of this offence:

    A common scold, communis rixatrix, (for our law-latin confines it to the feminine gender) is a public nuisance to her neighbourhood. For which offence she may be indicted; and, if convicted, shall be sentenced to be placed in a certain engine of correction called the trebucket, castigatory, or cucking stool, which in the Saxon language signifies the scolding stool; though now it is frequently corrupted into ducking stool, because the residue of the judgment is, that, when she is so placed therein, she shall be plunged in the water for her punishment.

    — Bl. Comm. IV:13.5.8, p. *169

    The prescribed penalty for this offence involved dunking the convicted offender in water in an instrument called the “cucking stool”. The cucking stool, according to Blackstone, eventually became known as a ducking stool by folk etymology.

    The Domesday Book notes the use of a cucking stool at Chester, a seat also known as cathedra stercoris, a “dung chair”, whose punishment apparently involved exposing the sitter’s buttocks to onlookers. This seat served to punish not only scolds, but also brewers and bakers who sold bad ale or bread, whereas the ducking stool dunked its victim into the water. Francois Maximilian Misson, a French traveller and writer, recorded the method used in England in the early 18th century:

    The way of punishing scolding women is pleasant enough. They fasten an armchair to the end of two beams twelve or fifteen feet long, and parallel to each other, so that these two pieces of wood with their two ends embrace the chair, which hangs between them by a sort of axle, by which means it plays freely, and always remains in the natural horizontal position in which a chair should be, that a person may sit conveniently in it, whether you raise it or let it down. They set up a post on the bank of a pond or river, and over this post they lay, almost in equilibrio, the two pieces of wood, at one end of which the chair hangs just over the water. They place the woman in this chair and so plunge her into the water as often as the sentence directs, in order to cool her immoderate heat.

    The ducking stool, rather than being fixed in position by the river or pond, could be mounted on wheels to allow the convicted woman to be paraded through the streets before punishment was carried out.

    Another method of ducking was to use the tumbrel, which consisted of a chair on two wheels with two long shafts fixed to the axles. This would be pushed into the ducking pond and the shafts would be released, tipping the chair up backwards and ducking the occupant.

    A scold’s bridle, known in Scotland as a brank, consists of a locking metal mask or head cage that contains a tab that fits in the mouth to inhibit talking. Some have claimed that convicted common scolds had to wear such a device as a preventive or punitive measure.

    Legal sources do not mention them in the context of the punishment of common scolds, but there are anecdotal reports of their historical use as a public punishment.

    In 17th-century New England and Long Island, scolds or those convicted of similar offences—both men and women—could be sentenced to stand with their tongue in a cleft stick, a more primitive but easier-to-construct version of the scold’s bridle, but the ducking stool also made the trip across the Atlantic.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-14 15:31:00 UTC

  • ) We moral men at least try despite the futility of it all

    ) We moral men at least try despite the futility of it all

    😉 We moral men at least try despite the futility of it all. https://t.co/Ik4xS1x02s


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-13 21:39:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205603290181984259

    Reply addressees: @MattThePatriot @CDOYB @BigDonTee @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205601832455876609


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205601832455876609

  • EZRA: how would you warranty and be subject to liability for advocacy of somethi

    EZRA: how would you warranty and be subject to liability for advocacy of something as unpredictable as a continued rise in temperature, especially when we are in a rare interglacial period and all human achievement has been dependent upon that warmth above the 45th parallel?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-13 21:00:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205593264478474246

    Reply addressees: @ezraklein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205590235226050560


    IN REPLY TO:

    @ezraklein

    The scariest news this week: https://t.co/jMZe6HDKNG

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205590235226050560

  • UPDATE: PLEASE NOTE THAT I’VE UPDATED THE LIST OF CRIMES TO INCLUDE BAITING INTO

    UPDATE: PLEASE NOTE THAT I’VE UPDATED THE LIST OF CRIMES TO INCLUDE BAITING INTO HAZARD

    1 – Murder,
    2 – Harm,
    3 – Damage, Theft,
    4 – Fraud, Fraud by omission, Fraud by indirection,
    5 -… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=528665184397043&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-13 17:11:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205535761145192448

  • UPDATE: PLEASE NOTE THAT I’VE UPDATED THE LIST OF CRIMES TO INCLUDE BAITING INTO

    UPDATE: PLEASE NOTE THAT I’VE UPDATED THE LIST OF CRIMES TO INCLUDE BAITING INTO HAZARD, AND UNDERMINING

    1 – Murder,

    2 – Harm,

    3 – Damage, Theft,

    4 – Fraud, Fraud by omission, Fraud by indirection,

    5 – Baiting into Hazard

    6 – Free Riding, Socialization of Losses, Privatization of Commons,

    7 – Rent seeking, Monopoly seeking, Conspiracy,

    8 – Undermining(via negativa), Conversion(via-positiva) religion/sophism/pseudoscience),

    9 – Displacement, Replacement (immigration/overbreeding),

    10 – Statism, Corporatism (vs kinship)

    11 – Conquest (war).

    12 – Genocide


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-13 12:11:00 UTC

  • Yes, Manners matter, and they matter a great deal: they are the first stage in t

    Yes, Manners matter, and they matter a great deal: they are the first stage in the sequence:Manners, Ethics, Morals, Truth, Promise, Contract, Trust, and DUTY. It may be this is the primary value of Church. “Sacred” means imposition of costs is prohibited for all – regardless.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 19:37:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205210072944726017

    Reply addressees: @90_guillem

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205194484113444871


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205194484113444871

  • Everyone should – be taught public manners – begin working by age twelve at the

    Everyone should
    – be taught public manners
    – begin working by age twelve at the latest.
    – work in a restaurant on tips or retail on commission.
    – have to perform maintenance of the commons
    -… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=527902877806607&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 18:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1205192244791332864

  • MANNERS by Luke Weinhagen Manners are (were) a way to signal trust. We (respondi

    MANNERS

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Manners are (were) a way to signal trust.

    We (responding to dysgenic social pressures) have shifted away from family derived forbearance (active) and into socially derived tolerance (passive). This has eliminated the familial incentive to practice manners so as not to lose the leeway and momentum one’s family name provides (forbearance being the a family’s way to assist you over mistakes, bad judgement calls and rough spots of life), leaving a handful of courtship incentives (that are mostly mocked by the same groups pushing us away from forbearance) and a few market incentives (the customer service example).

    The push for equality and tolerance have cost us trust and the effected the resulting loss of signal strength of manners.Updated Dec 12, 2019, 6:15 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-12 18:15:00 UTC