Theme: Responsibility

  • But why did you fail to learn from each and every just punishment of your people

    But why did you fail to learn from each and every just punishment of your people

    But why did you fail to learn from each and every just punishment of your people? Why can’t you learn to engage in productivity, Reciprocity, Truth, and contribution to the Commons, and instead why do you undermine every host civilization? https://t.co/aT2PU2hWoe


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-29 16:45:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211327298059808770

    Reply addressees: @JonnyGeller

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211277964899274757


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1211277964899274757

  • Soul = account of debts (threats) and credits (discounts). We are extremely cons

    Soul = account of debts (threats) and credits (discounts). We are extremely conscious of our status, debts, and credits. We can instantly judge our status debts and credits when we meet others or walk into a room or walk down a street. The Soul is a supernatural narrative of semitic origin like mathematical platonism is an ideal narrative of greek origin – both of which compensate for ancient man’s lack of understanding of the nervous system – a problem we no longer have. You live on in the memories of others as information. Your soul is your balance sheet in the social economy of your people.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-29 13:03:00 UTC

  • It’s not hard to prepare. Mostly, keep your finger off the trigger, and the barr

    It’s not hard to prepare. Mostly, keep your finger off the trigger, and the barrel at the sky; never shoot by or over anyone on your team; and don’t pull a trigger unless you have two seconds of sight time to be sure you know what you’re gonna hit. Why?

    Most of the time, you are waaaay more dangerous to your peers than the enemy.

    The rest comes naturally.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 16:05:00 UTC

  • Try the question on random people. You will find that almost always, russians bl

    Try the question on random people. You will find that almost always, russians blame the believer not the liar, while westerners blame the liar not the believer.

    This is the the problem. Trust. We have each been trained to trust in the opposite direction and both paid the cost.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 14:28:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210205687860645888

    Reply addressees: @galt_the @JohnNune1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210202565293400064


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210202565293400064

  • they do not seek reciprocity. They lie consistently to defend self image and sta

    … they do not seek reciprocity. They lie consistently to defend self image and status. Why don’t you admit your people’s repeated failures? Why the false history? Why the posturing? (We admit our screw ups all the time.)

    Here is the abrahamic method:
    https://propertarianism.com/2019/07/09/a-short-course-on-abrahamism-and-the-jq/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-26 14:20:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210203673458024448

    Reply addressees: @galt_the @JohnNune1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1210203006832140288


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @galt_the @JohnNune1 Women deny cooperation they do not seek compromise upon which to cooperate (preserve false status)
    Women do not admit fault. (preserve false status)
    They conflate truth/falsehood with approval/disapproval.
    They engage in undermining by moralizing, psychologizing, shaming….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1210203006832140288


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @galt_the @JohnNune1 Women deny cooperation they do not seek compromise upon which to cooperate (preserve false status)
    Women do not admit fault. (preserve false status)
    They conflate truth/falsehood with approval/disapproval.
    They engage in undermining by moralizing, psychologizing, shaming….

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1210203006832140288

  • DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS What is the difference between morals, ethics and manne

    DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS

    What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners?

    CORRECT ANSWER:

    It’s not complicated – if we explain it in **economic** rather than ‘moral’ language.

    Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred).

    Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of.

    Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.

    * **Series: Hygiene > Dress > Manners > Ethics > Morals > Laws > Reciprocity**

    MANNERS

    **Manners** advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity.

    **Respect** consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences.

    **Disrespect** consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences.

    **Insult** consists of (…)

    **Resistance** consist of (…)

    **Defection** consists of (…)

    || Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military

    **Display**

    * **Hygiene**

    * **Dress**

    * **Movement**

    **Word**

    * **Speech**

    **Deed**

    * **Action**

    * **Space**

    Manners signal respect by paying cost of observance, and require reciprocity by equal payment of costs of observance.

    Respect refers to presumption of the spectrum of reciprocity to beneficence by your demonstration of respect for others interests, and the interest of the commons.

    Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others.

    ETHICS

    (…)

    MORALS

    (…)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-24 15:33:00 UTC

  • AFAIK, anti-natalism is the product of feminism, postmodernism, and the bias of

    AFAIK, anti-natalism is the product of feminism, postmodernism, and the bias of females for infantilism (maintaining control). It’s an excuse to avoid responsibility, and hyper-consume, without repaying debt to prior generations who bore those costs you inherited and spent. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1207527095980765191

  • ( I have been trying to decide how to incorporate female denial of responsibilit

    ( I have been trying to decide how to incorporate female denial of responsibility or blame into the series that describes the female strategy of undermining. )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-18 17:36:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207354009314627584

  • That said, I am sort of ‘done’ with the research program. And I’m exploring whet

    That said, I am sort of ‘done’ with the research program. And I’m exploring whether I can make an argument for taking responsibility for self correction. It’ll create as much anger as when I went after religion. So yeah, I’m taking some wide swings and thanks for calling it out.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-18 03:01:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207133759641989121

    Reply addressees: @FischerKing64

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207133125819674624


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FischerKing64 I think I do my job. I try a lot of tactics. Do you think when I wrote what you’re referencing I didn’t insert it in there just to bait this kind of response? It is very hard to taunt people into engaging in this kind of discourse. Taleb does it. I do it. It’s a strategy. 🙂 …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1207133125819674624


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FischerKing64 I think I do my job. I try a lot of tactics. Do you think when I wrote what you’re referencing I didn’t insert it in there just to bait this kind of response? It is very hard to taunt people into engaging in this kind of discourse. Taleb does it. I do it. It’s a strategy. 🙂 …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1207133125819674624

  • Mistakes do not alter the consequence. Errors alter the consequence. 😉 We all m

    Mistakes do not alter the consequence.
    Errors alter the consequence.

    😉

    We all make mistakes.
    Few of us make few errors.

    Keep trying munchkin.
    Truth hurts.
    Man up and bear it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-17 20:14:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207031218660921345

    Reply addressees: @drownded

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207030903987290112


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1207030903987290112